Department of Electrical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Stanford University Center for Sleep Sciences and Medicine, Stanford University, CA.
Sleep. 2018 Mar 1;41(3). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy006.
The current definition of sleep arousals neglects to address the diversity of arousals and their systemic cohesion. Autonomic arousals (AA) are autonomic activations often associated with cortical arousals (CA), but they may also occur in relation to a respiratory event, a leg movement event or spontaneously, without any other physiological associations. AA should be acknowledged as essential events to understand and explore the systemic implications of arousals.
We developed an automatic AA detection algorithm based on intelligent feature selection and advanced machine learning using the electrocardiogram. The model was trained and tested with respect to CA systematically scored in 258 (181 training size/77 test size) polysomnographic recordings from the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort.
A precision value of 0.72 and a sensitivity of 0.63 were achieved when evaluated with respect to CA. Further analysis indicated that 81% of the non-CA-associated AAs were associated with leg movement (38%) or respiratory (43%) events.
The presented algorithm shows good performance when considering that more than 80% of the false positives (FP) found by the detection algorithm appeared in relation to either leg movement or respiratory events. This indicates that most FP constitute autonomic activations that are indistinguishable from those with cortical cohesion. The proposed algorithm provides an automatic system trained in a clinical environment, which can be utilized to analyze the systemic and clinical impacts of arousals.
目前的睡眠唤醒定义忽略了唤醒的多样性及其系统内聚性。自主唤醒(AA)是与皮层唤醒(CA)相关的自主激活,但也可能与呼吸事件、腿部运动事件或自发发生有关,而没有任何其他生理关联。AA 应该被认为是理解和探索唤醒的系统影响的基本事件。
我们使用心电图开发了一种基于智能特征选择和先进机器学习的自动 AA 检测算法。该模型使用来自威斯康星州睡眠队列的 258 个(181 个训练大小/77 个测试大小)多导睡眠记录中的 CA 进行了系统评分的训练和测试。
当评估 CA 时,该算法达到了 0.72 的精确值和 0.63 的灵敏度。进一步分析表明,81%的非 CA 相关 AA 与腿部运动(38%)或呼吸(43%)事件相关。
考虑到检测算法发现的超过 80%的假阳性(FP)大多与腿部运动或呼吸事件有关,该算法的性能良好。这表明大多数 FP 构成了与皮层内聚性难以区分的自主激活。所提出的算法提供了一个在临床环境中训练的自动系统,可以用于分析唤醒的系统和临床影响。