Gaugler Joseph E, Pestka Deborah L, Davila Heather, Sales Rebecca, Owen Greg, Baumgartner Sarah A, Shook Rocky, Cunningham Jane, Kenney Maureen
1 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
2 Amherst H. Wilder Foundation, St Paul, MN, USA.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2018 Dec;87(4):347-376. doi: 10.1177/0091415017752936. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
The current project examined the impact of caregiving and caregiving-work conflict on employees' well-being. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design (QUAN→qual) was utilized, and a total of 880 employees from a large health-care plan employer completed an online survey. Forty-five caregivers who completed the survey also participated in one of the five focus groups held 1 to 2 months later. Employed caregivers were significantly ( p < .05) more likely to indicate poorer physical and mental health than noncaregivers; among caregivers ( n = 370), caregiving-work conflict emerged as the most significant predictor of well-being and fully mediated the empirical relationship between burden and well-being. The focus group findings complemented the quantitative results; many of the challenges employed caregivers experience stem from their ability or inability to effectively balance their employment and caregiving roles. The results suggest the need to focus on caregiving-work conflict when constructing new or translating existing evidence-based caregiver interventions.
当前项目考察了照顾工作以及照顾工作与工作的冲突对员工幸福感的影响。采用了一种序列解释性混合方法设计(定量→定性),来自一家大型医疗保健计划雇主的880名员工完成了一项在线调查。完成调查的45名照顾者在1至2个月后还参加了五个焦点小组中的一个。有工作的照顾者比非照顾者更有可能显著(p < 0.05)地表示身心健康较差;在照顾者(n = 370)中,照顾工作与工作的冲突成为幸福感最显著的预测因素,并完全调节了负担与幸福感之间的实证关系。焦点小组的结果补充了定量研究结果;有工作的照顾者所经历的许多挑战源于他们能否有效平衡工作和照顾角色的能力。结果表明,在构建新的或转化现有的循证照顾者干预措施时,需要关注照顾工作与工作的冲突。