Oldenkamp Marloes, Bültmann Ute, Wittek Rafael P M, Stolk Ronald P, Hagedoorn Mariët, Smidt Nynke
Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jan;26(1):e122-e131. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12485. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
An increasing number of people combine paid work with the provision of informal care for a loved one. This combination of work and care may cause difficulties, necessitating adaptations at work, i.e. work arrangements. The present study explores what types of work arrangements are used by working caregivers, and which caregiver, care and work characteristics are associated with the use of these work arrangements. Within the Lifelines Informal Care Add-on Study (Lifelines ICAS), data on 965 Dutch informal caregivers in the North of the Netherlands were collected between May 2013 and July 2014 (response rate 48%), and data on 333 working adult-child caregivers (aged 26-68 years, 82% female) were used in this study. A small majority (56%) of the working caregivers used one or more work arrangement(s): taking time off (41%), individual agreements with supervisor (30%), formal care leave arrangement (13%), and reduction in paid work hours (6%). Logistic regression analyses showed that long working hours (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.08), and the experience of more health problems (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.56-4.05) or a disrupted schedule due to caregiving (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.66-3.78) increased the chance to have used one or more work arrangements. Lower educated working caregivers were less likely to have used a formal care leave arrangement (tertiary vs. primary education OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.13-6.67; tertiary vs. secondary education OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.27-5.09). Policy makers should inform working caregivers about the availability of the different work arrangements, with specific attention for low educated working caregivers. Employers need to consider a more caregiver-friendly policy, as almost half of the working adult-child caregivers did not use any work arrangement.
越来越多的人在从事有偿工作的同时还为亲人提供非正式照料。工作与照料的这种结合可能会引发困难,这就需要在工作中做出调整,即工作安排。本研究探讨了在职照料者会采用哪些类型的工作安排,以及哪些照料者、照料和工作特征与这些工作安排的使用相关。在生命线非正式照料附加研究(Lifelines ICAS)中,于2013年5月至2014年7月收集了荷兰北部965名荷兰非正式照料者的数据(回复率48%),本研究使用了333名在职成年子女照料者(年龄在26至68岁之间,82%为女性)的数据。在职照料者中略过半数(56%)采用了一种或多种工作安排:请假(41%)、与主管达成个人协议(30%)、正式照料假安排(13%)以及减少有偿工作时长(6%)。逻辑回归分析表明,长时间工作(比值比1.06,95%置信区间1.01 - 1.08)、更多健康问题经历(比值比2.54,95%置信区间1.56 - 4.05)或因照料导致日程安排紊乱(比值比2.50,95%置信区间1.66 - 3.78)会增加采用一种或多种工作安排的可能性。受教育程度较低的在职照料者采用正式照料假安排的可能性较小(高等教育与小学教育相比,比值比2.75,95%置信区间1.13 - 6.67;高等教育与中学教育相比,比值比1.27,95%置信区间1.27 - 5.09)。政策制定者应让在职照料者了解不同工作安排的可用性,尤其要关注受教育程度较低的在职照料者。雇主需要考虑制定更有利于照料者的政策,因为几乎一半的在职成年子女照料者未采用任何工作安排。