Singer Sara J, Benzer Justin K, Hamdan Sami U
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Nov 6;7:91-107. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S70115. eCollection 2015.
Despite decades of effort to improve quality and safety in health care, this goal feels increasingly elusive. Successful examples of improvement are infrequently replicated. This scoping review synthesizes 76 empirical or conceptual studies (out of 1208 originally screened) addressing learning in quality or safety improvement, that were published in selected health care and management journals between January 2000 and December 2014 to deepen understanding of the role that collective learning plays in quality and safety improvement. We categorize learning activities using a theoretical model that shows how leadership and environmental factors support collective learning processes and practices, and in turn team and organizational improvement outcomes. By focusing on quality and safety improvement, our review elaborates the premise of learning theory that leadership, environment, and processes combine to create conditions that promote learning. Specifically, we found that learning for quality and safety improvement includes experimentation (including deliberate experimentation, improvisation, learning from failures, exploration, and exploitation), internal and external knowledge acquisition, performance monitoring and comparison, and training. Supportive learning environments are characterized by team characteristics like psychological safety, appreciation of differences, openness to new ideas social motivation, and team autonomy; team contextual factors including learning resources like time for reflection, access to knowledge, organizational capabilities; incentives; and organizational culture, strategy, and structure; and external environmental factors including institutional pressures, environmental dynamism and competitiveness and learning collaboratives. Lastly learning in the context of quality and safety improvement requires leadership that reinforces learning through actions and behaviors that affect people, such as coaching and trust building, and through influencing contextual factors, including providing resources, developing culture, and taking strategic actions that support improvement. Our review highlights the importance of leadership in both promoting a supportive learning environment and implementing learning processes.
尽管数十年来一直致力于提高医疗保健的质量和安全性,但这一目标却愈发难以实现。成功的改进案例很少被复制。本范围综述综合了76项实证或概念性研究(从最初筛选的1208项研究中选出),这些研究涉及质量或安全改进方面的学习,于2000年1月至2014年12月期间发表在选定的医疗保健和管理期刊上,以加深对集体学习在质量和安全改进中所起作用的理解。我们使用一个理论模型对学习活动进行分类,该模型展示了领导和环境因素如何支持集体学习过程与实践,进而影响团队和组织的改进成果。通过聚焦质量和安全改进,我们的综述阐述了学习理论的前提,即领导、环境和过程相结合创造出促进学习的条件。具体而言,我们发现质量和安全改进方面的学习包括实验(包括刻意实验、即兴发挥、从失败中学习、探索和利用)、内部和外部知识获取、绩效监测与比较以及培训。支持性学习环境的特点包括团队特征,如心理安全、对差异的欣赏、对新思想的开放态度、社会动机和团队自主性;团队背景因素,包括学习资源,如反思时间、知识获取途径、组织能力;激励措施;以及组织文化、战略和结构;外部环境因素,包括制度压力、环境动态性和竞争力以及学习协作网络。最后,质量和安全改进背景下的学习需要领导通过影响人的行动和行为(如指导和建立信任)以及通过影响背景因素(包括提供资源、发展文化和采取支持改进的战略行动)来强化学习。我们的综述强调了领导在促进支持性学习环境和实施学习过程方面的重要性。