Suppr超能文献

寻找智能:人类工具使用和技术认知研究的统一框架。

Looking for intoolligence: A unified framework for the cognitive study of human tool use and technology.

机构信息

Laboratoire d'Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (EA 3082), Université de Lyon.

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2018 Feb-Mar;73(2):169-185. doi: 10.1037/amp0000162. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

Abstract

Humans have considerably modified their environment by making and building a number of tools, technologies, and constructions. This unique ability compared to other animals is the focus of researchers in different fields of psychology. However, there is confusion about the definitions proposed, generating difficulties in making connections between those different fields. This article presents the first unified framework (i.e., intoolligence) aiming to overcome these issues by focusing on the cognitive processes involved in the different forms taken by human tool use and technology, rather than on the overt behavior. To lay the foundation for intoolligence, we first address a series of epistemological misconceptions, which are the root cause for the current confusion. Particularly, we discuss the limitations of the widespread idea that tool use relies on specific cognitive skills, centered on the manipulative aspect of tool use. We develop, based on this analysis, details concerning our framework, which is based on the key principle that making and using are 2 independent cognitive steps. This distinction allows us to redefine tool use by breaking it down into 3 modes: assistive tool use, arbitrary tool use, and free tool use. This article opens a new chapter on the topic of human tool use and technology. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

人类通过制造和构建许多工具、技术和建筑,极大地改变了他们的环境。与其他动物相比,这种独特的能力是不同心理学领域研究人员的关注焦点。然而,对于提出的定义存在混淆,这导致在不同领域之间建立联系变得困难。本文提出了第一个统一的框架(即智力),旨在通过关注人类工具使用和技术所采用的不同形式涉及的认知过程,而不是显性行为,来克服这些问题。为了奠定智力的基础,我们首先解决了一系列认识论上的误解,这些误解是当前混乱的根源。特别是,我们讨论了广泛认为工具使用依赖于特定认知技能的观点的局限性,这些技能集中在工具使用的操纵方面。我们基于这一分析,详细阐述了我们的框架,其关键原则是制造和使用是 2 个独立的认知步骤。这种区别允许我们通过将工具使用分解为 3 种模式来重新定义工具使用:辅助工具使用、任意工具使用和自由工具使用。本文为人类工具使用和技术的主题开辟了一个新的篇章。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验