Suppr超能文献

牙齿年龄评估:哪种方法最适用?

Dental age assessment: Which is the most applicable method?

作者信息

Lopes Luciana Jácome, Nascimento Helena Aguiar Ribeiro, Lima Giovanna Panebianchi, Santos Luís Antônio Nogueira Dos, Queluz Dagmar de Paula, Freitas Deborah Queiroz

机构信息

Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Department of Clinical and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Mar;284:97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.044. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

Abstract

To evaluate which method is the most applicable for estimating estimate dental age in Brazilian children, Nolla or Demirjian. For this purpose, both methods were reviewed and the differences between them brought to light. A total of 403 healthy children between the ages of 7 and 13 years with satisfactory panoramic radiographs, similar socio-economic background and ethnic origin were included. Panoramic radiographs were examined by the Nolla and Demirjian methods. Dental age was calculated for both methods, and the differences between the dental age and the chronological age were compared with analysis of variance with post hoc Dunnett. The Nolla method showed no significant difference in relation to chronological age in the majority of age groups for boys and girls, except for 12-year-old boys (over-estimation of 1.00) and between 11- and 12-year-old girls (over-estimation of 0.51 and 0.59, respectively). An over-estimation of the dental age was observed by using the Demirjian method (for boys 0.89-1.84 and for girls 0.69-1.97) for all age groups. The Nolla method is suitable for Brazilian children when it comes to age estimate with care to growth spurt beginning (around 11 and 12 years). However, the Dermijian method should not be used, because it over-estimated the age in both sexes.

摘要

为了评估哪种方法最适用于估算巴西儿童的牙齿年龄,即诺拉法(Nolla)还是德米尔坚法(Demirjian)。为此,对这两种方法进行了综述,并揭示了它们之间的差异。总共纳入了403名年龄在7至13岁之间、全景X线片满意、社会经济背景和种族出身相似的健康儿童。用诺拉法和德米尔坚法对全景X线片进行检查。计算两种方法的牙齿年龄,并通过方差分析和事后邓尼特检验比较牙齿年龄与实际年龄之间的差异。诺拉法在大多数年龄组的男孩和女孩中与实际年龄相比无显著差异,但12岁男孩除外(高估1.00)以及11至12岁女孩之间(分别高估0.51和0.59)。使用德米尔坚法观察到所有年龄组的牙齿年龄均被高估(男孩为0.89 - 1.84,女孩为0.69 - 1.97)。在估算年龄时,考虑到生长突增开始(约11岁和12岁左右),诺拉法适用于巴西儿童。然而,德米尔坚法不应使用,因为它高估了两性的年龄。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验