Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Behavior, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 25;15(2):201. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020201.
Evaluating the safety of e-cigarettes and making informed judgement about developing potential standards require sufficient scientific evidence. Since e-cigarettes are highly engineered products containing plastic, glass and metal parts, and e-liquids are largely different matrices, many toxic compounds which are not typical hazards for the users of combustible tobacco products (e.g., cigarettes), could exist in e-liquids, and consequently, posing potential health risk to e-cigarette users. We combined the measurements of urinary metabolites of organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) with questionnaire data collected in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) from 2013 to 2014, and we compared adjusted geometric means (GM) for each biomarker in e-cigarette users with levels in non-users and users of various tobacco products using multiple regression analyses to adjust for potential confounders. We found diphenyl phosphate (DPhP), bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BDCPP), bis(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (BCEP), and dibutyl phosphate (DBUP) were detected in all e-cigarette users. The adjusted GM of BCEP, the metabolite of tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP), was 81% higher than nonusers ( = 0.0124) and significantly higher than those for both cigarette and cigar users ( < 0.05). The findings in this pilot study suggest that certain OPFRs may present in e-cigarettes as contaminants, and consequently, resulting in higher exposure levels in e-cigarette users compared to nonusers. As we only identified 14 e-cigarette users in the survey, the findings in this study need to be confirmed in future study at a larger scale. A better examination of the types and levels of FRs and their potential contamination sources in e-cigarettes is also needed.
评估电子烟的安全性并就制定潜在标准做出明智判断需要充分的科学证据。由于电子烟是高度工程化的产品,包含塑料、玻璃和金属部件,并且电子烟液的基质差异很大,许多对可燃烟草产品(例如香烟)使用者来说不是典型危害的有毒化合物可能存在于电子烟液中,因此对电子烟使用者构成潜在健康风险。我们将有机磷阻燃剂(OPFR)的尿代谢物测量结果与 2013 年至 2014 年全国健康和营养调查(NHANES)中收集的问卷数据相结合,并使用多元回归分析比较了电子烟使用者与非使用者和各种烟草制品使用者的每个生物标志物的调整后的几何平均值(GM),以调整潜在的混杂因素。我们发现所有电子烟使用者体内都检测到了磷酸二苯酯(DPhP)、双(1,3-二氯-2-丙基)磷酸酯(BDCPP)、双(2-氯乙基)磷酸酯(BCEP)和磷酸二丁酯(DBUP)。三(2-氯乙基)磷酸酯(TCEP)代谢物 BCEP 的调整后 GM 比非使用者高 81%(=0.0124),并且明显高于香烟和雪茄使用者(<0.05)。这项初步研究的结果表明,某些 OPFR 可能作为污染物存在于电子烟中,因此与非使用者相比,电子烟使用者的暴露水平更高。由于我们在调查中只识别出 14 名电子烟使用者,因此本研究的结果需要在未来更大规模的研究中得到证实。还需要更好地检查电子烟中 FR 的类型和水平及其潜在的污染来源。