Suppr超能文献

心脏磁共振成像用于检测心房颤动患者左心房/左心耳血栓:荟萃分析与系统评价

Cardiac MRI for detecting left atrial/left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation : Meta-analysis and systematic review.

作者信息

Chen J, Zhang H, Zhu D, Wang Y, Byanju S, Liao M

机构信息

Department of Radiology, ZhongNan Hospital, WuHan University, No. 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, 430071, Wuhan City, Hubei province, China.

出版信息

Herz. 2019 Aug;44(5):390-397. doi: 10.1007/s00059-017-4676-9. Epub 2018 Jan 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in detecting left atrial/left atrial appendage (LA/LAA) thrombus and to analyze the difference between the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging sequences.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies from 2000 to 2017 that compared CMR with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in detecting LA/LAA thrombus. The CMR images were analyzed in four categories: (1) cine-CMR; (2) first-pass contrast-enhanced 3D CMR angiography (CE-MRA); (3) delayed-enhancement CMR (DE-CMR); and (4) CMR, regardless of the magnetic resonance sequences used. Descriptive and quantitative information was extracted and Meta-DiSc 1.4 was used to perform the analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis included 582 patients from seven publications. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic of cine-CMR were 91.00%, 93.00%, 50.43, 10.04, 0.24, and 93.93%, respectively; for CE-MRA, the values were 77.00%, 97.00%, 179.21, 51.77, 0.30, and 97.63%, respectively; for DE-CMR, 100.00%, 99.00%, 849.70, 77.62, 0.09, and 99.38%, respectively; and for CMR, 80.00%, 99.00%, 187.54, 24.21, 0.17, and 97.71%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with atrial fibrillation, CMR has been proven to be a favorable diagnostic technique for the detection and assessment of LA/LAA thrombus. Among the imaging sequences evaluated, DE-CMR had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

背景

本荟萃分析的目的是评估心脏磁共振成像(CMR)检测左心房/左心耳(LA/LAA)血栓的准确性,并分析不同成像序列诊断准确性之间的差异。

方法

系统检索了PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中2000年至2017年期间比较CMR与经食管超声心动图(TEE)检测LA/LAA血栓的研究。CMR图像分为四类进行分析:(1)电影CMR;(2)首过对比增强三维CMR血管造影(CE-MRA);(3)延迟增强CMR(DE-CMR);(4)CMR,不考虑所使用的磁共振序列。提取描述性和定量信息,并使用Meta-DiSc 1.4进行分析。

结果

分析纳入了来自7篇文献的582例患者。电影CMR的合并敏感性、特异性、诊断比值比、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和汇总受试者工作特征分别为91.00%、93.00%、50.43、10.04、0.24和93.93%;CE-MRA的值分别为77.00%、97.00%、179.21、51.77、0.30和97.63%;DE-CMR分别为100.00%、99.00%、849.70、77.62、0.09和99.38%;CMR分别为80.00%、99.00%、187.54、24.21、0.17和97.71%。

结论

在房颤患者中,CMR已被证明是检测和评估LA/LAA血栓的一种良好诊断技术。在所评估的成像序列中,DE-CMR具有最高的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验