Hungerford Daniel, Vivancos Roberto, Read Jonathan M, Iturriza-Gόmara Miren, French Neil, Cunliffe Nigel A
The Centre for Global Vaccine Research, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, L69 7BE, Liverpool, UK.
Field Epidemiology Services, Public Health England, L3 1DS, Liverpool, UK.
BMC Med. 2018 Jan 29;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0989-z.
Rotavirus causes severe gastroenteritis in infants and young children worldwide. The UK introduced the monovalent rotavirus vaccine (Rotarix®) in July 2013. Vaccination is free of charge to parents, with two doses delivered at 8 and 12 weeks of age. We evaluated vaccine impact across a health system in relation to socioeconomic deprivation.
We used interrupted time-series analyses to assess changes in monthly health-care attendances in Merseyside, UK, for all ages, from July 2013 to June 2016, compared to predicted counterfactual attendances without vaccination spanning 3-11 years pre-vaccine. Outcome measures included laboratory-confirmed rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) hospitalisations, acute gastroenteritis (AGE) hospitalisations, emergency department (ED) attendances for gastrointestinal conditions and consultations for infectious gastroenteritis at community walk-in centres (WIC) and general practices (GP). All analyses were stratified by age. Hospitalisations were additionally stratified by vaccine uptake and small-area-level socioeconomic deprivation.
The uptake of the first and second doses of rotavirus vaccine was 91.4% (29,108/31,836) and 86.7% (27,594/31,836), respectively. Among children aged < 5 years, the incidence of gastrointestinal disease decreased across all outcomes post-vaccine introduction: 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70-87%; p < 0.001) for RVGE hospitalisation, 44% (95% CI 35-53%; p < 0.001) for AGE hospitalisations, 23% (95% CI 11-33%; p < 0.001) for ED, 32% (95% CI 7-50%; p = 0.02) for WIC and 13% (95% CI -3-26%; p = 0.10) for GP. The impact was greatest during the rotavirus season and for vaccine-eligible age groups. In adults aged 65+ years, AGE hospitalisations fell by 25% (95% CI 19-30%; p < 0.001). The pre-vaccine risk of AGE hospitalisation was highest in the most socioeconomically deprived communities (adjusted incident rate ratio 1.57; 95% CI 1.51-1.64; p < 0.001), as was the risk for non-vaccination (adjusted risk ratio 1.54; 95% CI 1.34-1.75; p < 0.001). The rate of AGE hospitalisations averted per 1,000 first doses of vaccine was higher among infants in the most deprived communities compared to the least deprived in 2014/15 (28; 95% CI 25-31 vs. 15; 95% CI 12-17) and in 2015/16 (26; 95% CI 23-30 vs. 13; 95% CI 11-16).
Following the introduction of rotavirus vaccination, incidence of gastrointestinal disease reduced across the health-care system. Vaccine impact was greatest among the most deprived populations, despite lower vaccine uptake. Prioritising vaccine uptake in socioeconomically deprived communities should give the greatest health benefit in terms of population disease burden.
轮状病毒在全球范围内导致婴幼儿严重胃肠炎。英国于2013年7月引入单价轮状病毒疫苗(Rotarix®)。疫苗对家长免费,在8周和12周龄时接种两剂。我们评估了在整个卫生系统中疫苗接种对社会经济剥夺状况的影响。
我们采用中断时间序列分析,评估2013年7月至2016年6月英国默西塞德郡各年龄段每月的医疗就诊情况变化,并与疫苗接种前3 - 11年未接种疫苗的预测反事实就诊情况进行比较。结局指标包括实验室确诊的轮状病毒胃肠炎(RVGE)住院病例、急性胃肠炎(AGE)住院病例、因胃肠道疾病的急诊科(ED)就诊病例以及社区即时诊疗中心(WIC)和全科诊所(GP)的感染性胃肠炎咨询病例。所有分析均按年龄分层。住院病例还按疫苗接种率和小区域层面的社会经济剥夺状况进行分层。
第一剂和第二剂轮状病毒疫苗的接种率分别为91.4%(29,108/31,836)和86.7%(27,594/31,836)。在5岁以下儿童中,疫苗引入后所有结局指标的胃肠道疾病发病率均下降:RVGE住院病例下降80%(95%置信区间[CI]70 - 87%;p < 0.001),AGE住院病例下降44%(95% CI 35 - 53%;p < 0.001),ED就诊病例下降 23%(95% CI 11 - 33%;p < 0.001),WIC咨询病例下降32%(95% CI 7 - 50%;p = 0.02),GP咨询病例下降13%(95% CI - 3 - 26%;p = 0.10)。在轮状病毒季节和符合疫苗接种条件的年龄组中影响最大。在65岁及以上成年人中,AGE住院病例下降了25%(95% CI 19 - 30%;p < 0.001)。社会经济剥夺程度最高的社区中AGE住院病例的疫苗接种前风险最高(调整后的发病率比值1.57;95% CI 1.51 - 1.64;p < 0.001),未接种疫苗的风险也最高(调整后的风险比值1.54;95% CI 1.34 - 1.75;p < 0.001)。与最不贫困社区相比,2014/15年度(28;95% CI 25 - 31对15;95% CI 12 - 17)和2015/16年度(26;95% CI 23 - 30对13;95% CI 11 - 16)最贫困社区中每1000剂首剂疫苗避免的AGE住院病例率更高。
引入轮状病毒疫苗后,整个卫生系统中胃肠道疾病的发病率降低。尽管疫苗接种率较低,但疫苗对最贫困人群的影响最大。在社会经济剥夺社区优先提高疫苗接种率,从人群疾病负担角度来看应能带来最大的健康效益。