Suppr超能文献

《疼痛应对问卷》在芬兰的验证。

Validation of the Pain Coping Questionnaire in Finnish.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Life Science, University of Tampere, Finland.

Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Education, University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2018 May;22(5):1016-1025. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1187. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Pain Coping Questionnaire (PCQ), the first validated pain coping measurement developed specifically for children, has lacked proper validation in Finnish. The original PCQ by Reid et al. (Pain 1998; 76; 83-96) comprises eight-first-order and three higher-order scales. The aim herein was to determine the factor structure and validity of the Finnish PCQ translation in Finnish children.

METHODS

Exploratory factor analysis was used for the first-order and higher-order classification of 91 recruited patients aged 8-15. Cronbach's alpha was used for reliability. Relationships between the Children's Depression Inventory, patient-reported pain frequency and pain coping strategies were examined.

RESULTS

Analyses were executed with 38 items; one was excluded. A structure of eight-first-order (Internalizing/Catastrophizing [IC], Positive Self-Statements [PSS], Information Seeking [IS], Seeking Social Support [SSS], Cognitive Distraction [CD], Externalizing [EXT], Behavioural Distraction [BD], Problem Solving [PS]) and three higher-order scales (Approach [APP], Emotion-Focused Avoidance [EFA], Distraction [DIS]) proved the most consistent. Four first-order scales (PSS, CD, EXT, BD) emerged as identical to the original solution. Internal consistency reliability coefficients for all individual first- and second-order scales were satisfactory. A higher CDI score was positively related to EFA and negatively to DIS, and pain frequency positively related to APP and EFA.

CONCLUSION

The exploratory factor analysis of the PCQ provided a both culturally and statistically satisfactory structure in the Finnish translation. This supports the reliability and validity of the PCQ in future national use and the value of the questionnaire also outside English-speaking countries.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study showed both culturally and statistically satisfactory factor structure of PCQ in the Finnish translation. This result supports reliability and validity of the PCQ in the national use in the future. The result shows that the PCQ is a reliable method to be used in different linguistic and cultural surroundings and, thus, encourages using it in various countries. The data consist of two patient groups, adolescents with JIA and musculoskeletal pain. Pain and specifically coping with pain are important aspects of clinical work. A valid pain coping scale may enhance distinguishing vulnerable pain coping style in children and adolescent before pain becomes chronic.

摘要

目的

疼痛应对问卷(PCQ)是专为儿童开发的第一个经过验证的疼痛应对测量工具,但在芬兰尚未得到适当验证。Reid 等人的原始 PCQ(疼痛 1998 年;76;83-96)包括八个一阶和三个高阶量表。本研究旨在确定芬兰语翻译的芬兰 PCQ 的因子结构和有效性。

方法

对 91 名 8-15 岁招募的患者进行探索性因子分析,用于一阶和高阶分类。Cronbach's alpha 用于可靠性。还检查了儿童抑郁量表、患者报告的疼痛频率和疼痛应对策略之间的关系。

结果

对 38 项进行了分析;一项被排除在外。一个由八个一阶(内化/灾难化 [IC]、积极的自我陈述 [PSS]、信息寻求 [IS]、寻求社会支持 [SSS]、认知分心 [CD]、外化 [EXT]、行为分心 [BD]、解决问题 [PS])和三个高阶量表(方法 [APP]、情绪聚焦回避 [EFA]、分心 [DIS])组成的结构被证明是最一致的。四个一阶量表(PSS、CD、EXT、BD)与原始解决方案相同。所有个体一阶和二阶量表的内部一致性可靠性系数均令人满意。更高的 CDI 分数与 EFA 呈正相关,与 DIS 呈负相关,疼痛频率与 APP 和 EFA 呈正相关。

结论

PCQ 的探索性因子分析在芬兰语翻译中提供了一种文化和统计学上都令人满意的结构。这支持了未来在全国范围内使用 PCQ 的可靠性和有效性,以及在英语国家以外使用问卷的价值。

意义

本研究在芬兰语翻译中显示了 PCQ 的文化和统计学上都令人满意的因子结构。这一结果支持了未来在全国范围内使用 PCQ 的可靠性和有效性。结果表明,PCQ 是一种在不同语言和文化环境中可靠使用的方法,因此鼓励在各国使用。该数据由两组患者组成,青少年特发性关节炎和肌肉骨骼疼痛。疼痛,特别是应对疼痛,是临床工作的重要方面。有效的疼痛应对量表可以增强在疼痛成为慢性之前区分儿童和青少年易受伤害的疼痛应对方式的能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验