• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Pain Coping Questionnaire short-form: preliminary reliability and validity.疼痛应对问卷简表:初步的信度和效度
Pain Rep. 2022 Jan 12;7(1):e982. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000982. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.
2
Validation of the Pain Coping Questionnaire in Finnish.《疼痛应对问卷》在芬兰的验证。
Eur J Pain. 2018 May;22(5):1016-1025. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1187. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
3
Reliability, Validity, and Unidimensionality of the Korean Version of the Pornography Craving Questionnaire Based on the Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory.基于经典测验理论和项目反应理论的韩文版色情成瘾问卷的信度、效度和单维度性
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 Jun;18(6):530-538. doi: 10.30773/pi.2020.0401. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
4
[Development and validation of a questionnaire for patient competence in coping with cancer (PCQ)].[一份用于评估癌症患者应对能力的问卷(PCQ)的编制与验证]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2019 Sep;65(3):239-256. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2019.65.3.239.
5
A Danish adaptation of the Pain Coping Questionnaire for children: preliminary data concerning reliability and validity.
Acta Paediatr. 1999 Feb;88(2):132-8. doi: 10.1080/08035259950170277.
6
The Pain Coping Questionnaire: preliminary validation.疼痛应对问卷:初步验证
Pain. 1998 May;76(1-2):83-96. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00029-3.
7
Psychometric properties of the German version of the Psychological Consequences of Screening Questionnaire (PCQ) for liver diseases.肝病筛查问卷(PCQ)德文版的心理测量特性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 11;13:956674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956674. eCollection 2022.
8
Validation of a pediatric cough questionnaire.一份儿科咳嗽问卷的验证
Ear Nose Throat J. 2009 Nov;88(11):1213-7.
9
Coping with pain: Polish versions of the Pain Coping Questionnaire for both children and parents.应对疼痛:儿童和家长用的疼痛应对问卷的波兰语版本。
Pain Manag. 2022 May;12(4):487-497. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2021-0100. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
10
The prostate care questionnaire for patients (PCQ-P): reliability, validity and acceptability.前列腺患者关怀问卷(PCQ-P):信度、效度和可接受性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Nov 4;9:199. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-199.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic pain in children and young people with cerebral palsy: a narrative review of challenges, advances, and future directions.脑瘫儿童和青少年的慢性疼痛:挑战、进展和未来方向的叙述性综述。
BMC Med. 2024 Jun 11;22(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03458-0.
2
Considerations for Pain Assessments in Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review of the Latin American Perspective.癌症患者疼痛评估的考量因素:拉丁美洲视角的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2023 Jun 22;15(6):e40804. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40804. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Pain-coping scale for children and their parents: a cross-sectional study in children with musculoskeletal pain.儿童及其父母疼痛应对量表:一项肌肉骨骼疼痛儿童的横断面研究。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2023 Jan 25;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12969-023-00791-1.
4
Pain coping tools for children and young adults with a neurodevelopmental disability: A systematic review of measurement properties.神经发育障碍儿童和青少年的疼痛应对工具:测量特性的系统评价。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2023 Mar;65(3):318-328. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15410. Epub 2022 Sep 16.

本文引用的文献

1
A digital health psychological intervention (WebMAP Mobile) for children and adolescents with chronic pain: results of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.一种针对患有慢性疼痛的儿童和青少年的数字健康心理干预(WebMAP Mobile):一项混合有效性-实施阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的结果。
Pain. 2020 Dec;161(12):2763-2774. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001994.
2
The iCanCope pain self-management application for adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.《iCanCope 青少年特发性关节炎疼痛自我管理应用程序:一项试点随机对照试验》。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Jan 5;60(1):196-206. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa178.
3
Catastrophizing, pain, and functional outcomes for children with chronic pain: a meta-analytic review.慢性疼痛儿童的灾难化、疼痛和功能结局:一项荟萃分析综述。
Pain. 2018 Dec;159(12):2442-2460. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001342.
4
Validation of the Pain Coping Questionnaire in Finnish.《疼痛应对问卷》在芬兰的验证。
Eur J Pain. 2018 May;22(5):1016-1025. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1187. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
Disability, Quality of Life, and Pain Coping in Pediatric Migraine: An Observational Study.儿童偏头痛中的残疾、生活质量和疼痛应对:一项观察性研究。
J Child Neurol. 2017 Jul;32(8):717-724. doi: 10.1177/0883073817702025. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
6
Pediatric Chronic Pain: Biopsychosocial Assessment and Formulation.儿科慢性疼痛:生物心理社会评估与制订。
Pediatrics. 2016 Nov;138(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0331. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
7
Pain coping strategies: Neonatal intensive care unit survivors in adolescence.疼痛应对策略:青少年期的新生儿重症监护病房幸存者
Early Hum Dev. 2016 Dec;103:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Pain, Fatigue, and Psychological Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life in Childhood-Onset Lupus.疼痛、疲劳及心理因素对儿童期起病系统性红斑狼疮患者健康相关生活质量的影响
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jan;68(1):73-80. doi: 10.1002/acr.22650.
9
The reported pain coping strategies of pediatric burn survivors-does a correlation exist between coping style and development of anxiety disorder?小儿烧伤幸存者报告的疼痛应对策略——应对方式与焦虑症的发展之间是否存在关联?
J Burn Care Res. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):336-43. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000109.
10
iCanCope with Pain™: User-centred design of a web- and mobile-based self-management program for youth with chronic pain based on identified health care needs.“我能应对疼痛”(iCanCope with Pain™):基于已确定的医疗保健需求,为慢性疼痛青少年设计的以用户为中心的网络和移动自我管理项目。
Pain Res Manag. 2014 Sep-Oct;19(5):257-65. doi: 10.1155/2014/935278. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

疼痛应对问卷简表:初步的信度和效度

The Pain Coping Questionnaire short-form: preliminary reliability and validity.

作者信息

Kohut Sara Ahola, Stinson Jennifer, Chambers Christine T, Reid Graham J, Pillai Riddell Rebecca R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Pain Rep. 2022 Jan 12;7(1):e982. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000982. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.

DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000982
PMID:35047713
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8759611/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Pain Coping Questionnaire (PCQ) has support for its validity and reliability as a tool to understand how a child copes with pain of an extended duration. However, measure length may limit feasibility in clinical settings.

OBJECTIVES

The primary goal of this study was to develop a short-form (PCQ-SF) that could be used for screening how children cope with chronic or recurrent pain and examine its reliability and validity.

METHODS

The PCQ-SF was developed in a stepwise manner. First, a confirmatory factor analysis was computed using an amalgamated data set from the validation studies of the PCQ (N = 1225). Next, ratings from researchers and clinicians were obtained on PCQ item content and clarity (n = 12). Finally, the resulting 16-item short-form was tested in a pediatric sample living with chronic and recurrent pain (65 parent-child dyads; n = 128).

RESULTS

The PCQ-SF has acceptable preliminary reliability and validity. Both statistical and expert analyses support the collective use of the 16 items as an alternative to the full measure.

CONCLUSIONS

The compact format of the PCQ-SF will allow practitioners in high-volume clinical environments to quickly determine a child's areas of strengths and weaknesses when coping with pain. Future research using larger more diverse samples to confirm clinical validity is warranted.

摘要

引言

疼痛应对问卷(PCQ)作为一种了解儿童如何应对长时间疼痛的工具,其有效性和可靠性已得到验证。然而,问卷长度可能会限制其在临床环境中的可行性。

目的

本研究的主要目标是开发一种简短形式(PCQ-SF),用于筛查儿童应对慢性或复发性疼痛的方式,并检验其可靠性和有效性。

方法

PCQ-SF采用逐步开发的方式。首先,使用来自PCQ验证研究的合并数据集(N = 1225)进行验证性因素分析。其次,收集研究人员和临床医生对PCQ项目内容和清晰度的评分(n = 12)。最后,在患有慢性和复发性疼痛的儿科样本中测试最终得到的16项简短形式(65对亲子二元组;n = 128)。

结果

PCQ-SF具有可接受的初步可靠性和有效性。统计分析和专家分析均支持将这16个项目作为完整问卷的替代方案进行综合使用。

结论

PCQ-SF的紧凑形式将使高流量临床环境中的从业者能够在儿童应对疼痛时快速确定其优势和劣势领域。有必要开展进一步的研究,使用更大、更多样化的样本以确认其临床有效性。