• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疼痛评估量表-简式的因子结构、相关性和增量有效性。

Factor structure, correlates, and incremental validity of the Pain Appraisal Inventory-Short Form.

机构信息

Southwest University, China.

University of Macau, China.

出版信息

J Health Psychol. 2020 Aug;25(9):1292-1302. doi: 10.1177/1359105317753716. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1177/1359105317753716
PMID:29402142
Abstract

We assessed the factor structure, correlates, and incremental validity of the Pain Appraisal Inventory in Chinese adult chronic pain samples. In an initial exploratory factor analysis sample ( = 301), the original two-component (threat, challenge) 16-item Pain Appraisal Inventory and a 10-item short form (Pain Appraisal Inventory-Short Form) were supported. Within a confirmatory factor analysis sample (= 285), uniformly acceptable fits were observed only for the Pain Appraisal Inventory-Short Form. Furthermore, Pain Appraisal Inventory-Short Form threat and challenge subscales had significant correlations with conceptually related measures and added to prediction models for pain-related coping and adjustment, independent of other pain belief scales. Together, results indicated that the Pain Appraisal Inventory-Short Form has utility in Chinese chronic pain samples.

摘要

我们评估了疼痛评估量表在中文成人慢性疼痛样本中的结构因素、相关性和增量有效性。在初始探索性因素分析样本(n=301)中,原始的两因素(威胁、挑战)16 项疼痛评估量表和 10 项短表(疼痛评估量表-短表)得到了支持。在验证性因素分析样本(n=285)中,仅疼痛评估量表-短表观察到了一致的可接受拟合。此外,疼痛评估量表-短表的威胁和挑战分量表与概念上相关的测量指标显著相关,并为疼痛相关应对和调整的预测模型提供了补充,独立于其他疼痛信念量表。总的来说,结果表明疼痛评估量表-短表在中文慢性疼痛样本中有一定的效用。

相似文献

1
Factor structure, correlates, and incremental validity of the Pain Appraisal Inventory-Short Form.疼痛评估量表-简式的因子结构、相关性和增量有效性。
J Health Psychol. 2020 Aug;25(9):1292-1302. doi: 10.1177/1359105317753716. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetric property of Korean version of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42 in patients with chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛患者中韩文版慢性疼痛应对量表-42的跨文化适应性及测量学特性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 15;35(6):666-71. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ba7a78.
3
The 27-item coping strategies questionnaire-revised: confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and validity in Italian-speaking subjects with chronic pain.27项应对策略问卷修订版:意大利语慢性疼痛患者的验证性因素分析、信度和效度
Pain Res Manag. 2014 May-Jun;19(3):153-8. doi: 10.1155/2014/956828. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
4
Development of the Italian version of the 42-item Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, CPCI-I: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity.42 项慢性疼痛应对量表(CPCI-I)意大利语版的开发:跨文化调适、因子分析、信度和效度。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Aug;22(6):1459-65. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0271-y. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
5
Pediatric Pain Beliefs Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties of the Short Form.《儿科疼痛信念问卷:简版的心理测量特性》
J Pain. 2016 Sep;17(9):1036-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
6
Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire for Iranian People With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain.伊朗非特异性慢性颈痛人群应对策略问卷波斯文版的验证性因子分析、信度和效度。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jan;44(1):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
7
Developing a Short Multidimensional Measure of Pain Self-efficacy: The Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale-Short Form.开发一种简短的多维疼痛自我效能感测量工具:慢性疼痛自我效能感量表-简短版。
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):e127-e136. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz041.
8
Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Pain Resilience Scale Within Chinese Adult Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Samples.中文版慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者疼痛弹性量表的因子结构和建构效度研究。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Sep-Oct;103(5):685-694. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1801700. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
9
Structural validity of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-Brazilian version.慢性疼痛应对量表巴西版的结构效度。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):e0246294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246294. eCollection 2021.
10
Validation of a Simplified Chinese Version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and an Exploration of the Factors Predicting Catastrophizing in Pain Clinic Patients.疼痛灾难化量表简体中文版的验证及疼痛门诊患者灾难化预测因素的探索
Pain Physician. 2015 Nov;18(6):E1059-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Causal effects of challenge and threat appraisals on pain self-efficacy, pain coping, and tolerance for laboratory pain: An experimental path analysis study.挑战和威胁评估对疼痛自我效能、疼痛应对和实验室疼痛耐受力的因果效应:一项实验路径分析研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 23;14(4):e0215087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215087. eCollection 2019.