• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两岁以下儿童健康饮食教育材料的内容验证

CONTENT VALIDATION OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL ON HEALTHY EATING FOR CHILDREN UNDER TWO YEARS OF AGE.

作者信息

Ribeiro Zilda Maria T, Spadella Maria Angélica

机构信息

Faculdade de Medicina de Marília, Marília, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Paul Pediatr. 2018 Apr-Jun;36(2):155-163. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;2;00007. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;2;00007
PMID:29412433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6038784/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate the content of an educational material aimed at mothers and caregivers on healthy feeding for children less than two years of age.

METHODS

Quantitative study for content validation of an educational material containing three educational modules and respective folders, elaborated on the basis of official references for healthy feeding for children under two years old and adapted to the Brazilian context. Content validation was made through consensus conference in two stages by seven experts.

RESULTS

In the first stage, an individual and anonymous evaluation was made and the items analyzed by the seven experts averaged seven or more, with standard deviation below three. However, some items in the educational modules (operational and adherence) and Leaflet I (motivation and culture) reached cut-off values. The second stage involved a face-to-face meeting with five of the seven experts, expressing their opinions and seeking for a new consensus. The items whose results were close to the cut-off had an expressive increase in importance and consensus level after the meeting.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantitative data obtained after the consensus meetings were superior to the predefined cut-offs, and the content of the proposed educational material was consensually validated by all participating experts. The consensus conference was an efficient methodological technique to build and validate educational instruments.

摘要

目的

验证一份面向母亲和照顾者的关于两岁以下儿童健康喂养的教育材料的内容。

方法

对一份包含三个教育模块及各自文件夹的教育材料进行内容验证的定量研究,该材料基于两岁以下儿童健康喂养的官方参考资料编制,并根据巴西国情进行了调整。通过七名专家分两个阶段召开的共识会议进行内容验证。

结果

在第一阶段,进行了个人匿名评估,七名专家分析的项目平均得分在七分或以上,标准差低于三分。然而,教育模块(操作和依从性)及传单I(动机和文化)中的一些项目达到了临界值。第二阶段与七名专家中的五名进行了面对面会议,专家们发表意见并寻求新的共识。会议后,那些结果接近临界值的项目在重要性和共识水平上有显著提高。

结论

共识会议后获得的定量数据优于预先设定的临界值,所有参与的专家一致认可了所提议教育材料的内容。共识会议是构建和验证教育工具的一种有效方法技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c62/6038784/46157619d33b/0103-0582-rpp-2018-36-2-00007-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c62/6038784/0224e9f25186/0103-0582-rpp-2018-36-2-00007-gch1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c62/6038784/46157619d33b/0103-0582-rpp-2018-36-2-00007-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c62/6038784/0224e9f25186/0103-0582-rpp-2018-36-2-00007-gch1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c62/6038784/46157619d33b/0103-0582-rpp-2018-36-2-00007-gf1.jpg

相似文献

1
CONTENT VALIDATION OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL ON HEALTHY EATING FOR CHILDREN UNDER TWO YEARS OF AGE.两岁以下儿童健康饮食教育材料的内容验证
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2018 Apr-Jun;36(2):155-163. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;2;00007. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
2
Educational technology to promote self-efficacy in newborn care: a validation study.教育技术促进新生儿护理中的自我效能感:一项验证研究。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2024 Jun;42(2). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v42n2e14.
3
Development and Validation of Educational Leaflet for Caregivers of Preterm Infants.早产儿照顾者教育手册的开发与验证
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):YC01-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19206.8109. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
4
Construction and Validation of Educational Material for Children with Hydrocephalus and Their Informal Caregivers.脑积水患儿及其非正式照料者教育材料的构建与验证
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:381-390. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.082. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
5
Construction and validation of an Educational Content Validation Instrument in Health.健康领域教育内容效度工具的构建与验证
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71(suppl 4):1635-1641. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0648.
6
Educational material production and validity: educational instrument for home care for premature newborns.教育材料制作与有效性:早产儿家庭护理教育工具。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 Jan 30;76(1):e20210648. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0648. eCollection 2023.
7
Evaluating Educational Material from the Perspective of Informal Caregivers of Children with Hydrocephalus: A Qualitative Study.从脑积水患儿非专业照护者的角度评估教育材料:一项定性研究。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:427-433. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
8
Construction and validation of an educational gerontotechnology on frailty in elderly people.构建和验证老年人衰弱的老年医学教育技术。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Dec 7;73(suppl 3):e20200800. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0800. eCollection 2020.
9
Construction and validation of a family guidance manual on complications of intravenous therapy in children.儿童静脉治疗并发症家庭指导手册的编制与验证
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Mar 24;74(1):e20190688. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0688. eCollection 2021.
10
Construction and validation of an educational technology for mother-child bond in the neonatal intensive care unit.构建并验证新生儿重症监护病房母婴联系的教育技术。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(4):e20190083. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0083. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of an interprofessional collaborative educational module on the self-management of foot for individuals with type II diabetes mellitus in India.印度2型糖尿病患者足部自我管理跨专业协作教育模块的开发与验证
F1000Res. 2025 Feb 4;13:386. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.146943.4. eCollection 2024.
2
Nursing outcomes and social support intervention for diabetes self-management: consensus study.糖尿病自我管理的护理结局与社会支持干预:共识研究
Rev Cuid. 2024 Sep 1;15(3):e3742. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.3742. eCollection 2024 Sep-Dec.
3
Development and validation of children's stories as a health education strategy in speech, language, and hearing sciences.

本文引用的文献

1
[Food consumption Brazilian children by 6 to 59 months of age].[6至59个月大的巴西儿童的食物消费情况]
Cad Saude Publica. 2012 Sep;28(9):1759-71. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2012000900014.
2
[Consensus on the legibility criteria of health education leaflets].[关于健康教育传单可读性标准的共识]
An Sist Sanit Navar. 2011 May-Aug;34(2):153-65. doi: 10.4321/s1137-66272011000200003.
3
Infant and early childhood dietary predictors of overweight at age 8 years in the CAPS population.CAPS 人群中 8 岁时超重的婴儿和幼儿饮食预测因素。
发展和验证儿童故事作为言语、语言和听力科学中的健康教育策略。
Codas. 2022 Aug 19;34(6):e20210309. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021309pt. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact of the HOPE Intervention on Mental Health Literacy, Psychological Well-Being and Stress Levels amongst University Undergraduates: A Randomised Controlled Trial.HOPE 干预对大学生心理健康素养、心理幸福感和压力水平的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 8;19(15):9772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159772.
5
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Strategies to end seclusion restraint module of the QualityRights ToolKit.文化适应性和验证 QualityRights 工具包中结束隔离约束模块的策略。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2022 Apr 20;30:e3553. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.5638.3553. eCollection 2022.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 Apr;65(4):454-62. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.7. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
4
Infant-feeding patterns and cardiovascular risk factors in young adulthood: data from five cohorts in low- and middle-income countries.婴儿喂养模式与青年期心血管危险因素:来自中低收入国家五个人群队列的研究数据。
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;40(1):47-62. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq155. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
5
Complementary feeding: inappropriate practices in infants.补充喂养:婴儿的不当做法。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2010 May-Jun;86(3):196-201. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1994. Epub 2010 Apr 16.
6
[A framework for health surveillance decentralization].[卫生监测权力下放框架]
Cad Saude Publica. 2009 Oct;25(10):2201-17. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2009001000011.
7
Tracking of childhood overweight into adulthood: a systematic review of the literature.儿童期超重追踪至成年期:文献系统综述
Obes Rev. 2008 Sep;9(5):474-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00475.x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
8
The quality and suitability of written educational materials for patients*.面向患者的书面教育材料的质量与适用性*
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jan;17(2):259-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02044.x.
9
[The development of handbooks of health care guidelines].[医疗保健指南手册的发展]
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2005 Sep-Oct;13(5):754-7. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692005000500022. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
10
Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.共识发展方法及其在临床指南制定中的应用。
Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i-iv, 1-88.