Zinn Caryn, Rush Amy, Johnson Rebecca
Human Potential Centre, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Telethon Type 1 Diabetes Family Centre, Stirling, Western Australia, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 8;8(2):e018846. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018846.
The low-carbohydrate, high-fat (LCHF) diet is becoming increasingly employed in clinical dietetic practice as a means to manage many health-related conditions. Yet, it continues to remain contentious in nutrition circles due to a belief that the diet is devoid of nutrients and concern around its saturated fat content. This work aimed to assess the micronutrient intake of the LCHF diet under two conditions of saturated fat thresholds.
In this descriptive study, two LCHF meal plans were designed for two hypothetical cases representing the average Australian male and female weight-stable adult. National documented heights, a body mass index of 22.5 to establish weight and a 1.6 activity factor were used to estimate total energy intake using the Schofield equation. Carbohydrate was limited to <130 g, protein was set at 15%-25% of total energy and fat supplied the remaining calories. One version of the diet aligned with the national saturated fat guideline threshold of <10% of total energy and the other included saturated fat ad libitum.
The primary outcomes included all micronutrients, which were assessed using FoodWorks dietary analysis software against national Australian/New Zealand nutrient reference value (NRV) thresholds.
All of the meal plans exceeded the minimum NRV thresholds, apart from iron in the female meal plans, which achieved 86%-98% of the threshold. Saturated fat intake was logistically unable to be reduced below the 10% threshold for the male plan but exceeded the threshold by 2 g (0.6%).
Despite macronutrient proportions not aligning with current national dietary guidelines, a well-planned LCHF meal plan can be considered micronutrient replete. This is an important finding for health professionals, consumers and critics of LCHF nutrition, as it dispels the myth that these diets are suboptimal in their micronutrient supply. As with any diet, for optimal nutrient achievement, meals need to be well formulated.
低碳水化合物、高脂肪(LCHF)饮食在临床饮食实践中越来越多地被用于管理多种与健康相关的状况。然而,由于认为该饮食缺乏营养以及对其饱和脂肪含量的担忧,它在营养学界仍然存在争议。这项研究旨在评估在两种饱和脂肪阈值条件下LCHF饮食的微量营养素摄入量。
在这项描述性研究中,针对代表澳大利亚体重稳定的成年男性和女性的两个假设案例设计了两种LCHF饮食计划。使用全国记录的身高、体重指数22.5来确定体重,并采用1.6的活动系数,通过斯科菲尔德方程估算总能量摄入量。碳水化合物限制在<130克,蛋白质设定为总能量的15%-25%,其余热量由脂肪提供。一种饮食版本符合全国饱和脂肪指南阈值,即占总能量的<10%,另一种则随意摄入饱和脂肪。
主要结果包括所有微量营养素,使用FoodWorks饮食分析软件对照澳大利亚/新西兰国家营养素参考值(NRV)阈值进行评估。
除了女性饮食计划中的铁元素达到阈值的86%-98%外,所有饮食计划都超过了最低NRV阈值。从逻辑上来说,男性饮食计划中的饱和脂肪摄入量无法降低到10%的阈值以下,但超出阈值2克(0.6%)。
尽管宏量营养素比例不符合当前国家饮食指南,但精心规划的LCHF饮食计划可被认为富含微量营养素。这对LCHF营养的健康专业人员、消费者和批评者来说是一个重要发现,因为它消除了这些饮食在微量营养素供应方面欠佳的误解。与任何饮食一样,为了实现最佳营养,膳食需要精心调配。