Freeman Madeleine, Waller Jo, Sasieni Peter, Lim Anita Ww, Marlow Laura Av
1 Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
2 Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
J Med Screen. 2018 Dec;25(4):205-210. doi: 10.1177/0969141318756452. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
One reason that women over age 50 report avoiding cervical screening is increased discomfort postmenopause. This study aimed to explore the acceptability of human papillomavirus testing on clinician-collected vaginal samples without a speculum ('non-speculum') for cervical screening among older women.
Thirty-eight women in England aged 50-64 with a range of cervical screening experience ('up-to-date' n = 17, 'overdue screening' n = 18, 'never screened' n = 3) were identified via a recruitment agency. Women participated in focus groups or interviews about the potential for using clinician-collected samples without a speculum. Discussions were analysed using Framework Analysis.
The two main themes identified were women's perceptions of the speculum and attitudes towards non-speculum screening. Many women reported negative experiences with the speculum, including increased pain after the menopause. Women generally had positive attitudes towards non-speculum clinician sampling and felt it would be a less intrusive option, but expressed concern that it could be less accurate than screening with a speculum. Women who were 'up-to-date' preferred conventional screening, while overdue and never screened women welcomed the option to be screened without a speculum.
Human papillomavirus testing on non-speculum clinician-collected vaginal samples could be an acceptable alternative cervical screening method for older women. Offering this approach could increase screening uptake in older women who find conventional cervical screening to be less acceptable with ageing or the menopause.
50岁以上女性报告避免进行宫颈筛查的一个原因是绝经后不适感增加。本研究旨在探讨在老年女性中,对临床医生采集的无窥器阴道样本(“无窥器”)进行人乳头瘤病毒检测用于宫颈筛查的可接受性。
通过一家招聘机构确定了38名年龄在50 - 64岁之间、具有不同宫颈筛查经历(“筛查及时”n = 17,“筛查逾期”n = 18,“从未筛查”n = 3)的英国女性。这些女性参与了关于使用无窥器临床医生采集样本可能性的焦点小组或访谈。讨论采用框架分析法进行分析。
确定的两个主要主题是女性对窥器的看法以及对无窥器筛查的态度。许多女性报告了使用窥器时的负面经历,包括绝经后疼痛加剧。女性总体上对无窥器临床医生采样持积极态度,认为这是侵入性较小的选择,但担心其准确性可能低于使用窥器进行的筛查。“筛查及时”的女性更喜欢传统筛查,而筛查逾期和从未筛查的女性则欢迎无窥器筛查的选择。
对临床医生采集的无窥器阴道样本进行人乳头瘤病毒检测可能是老年女性可接受的替代宫颈筛查方法。提供这种方法可能会提高那些因年龄增长或绝经而觉得传统宫颈筛查较难接受的老年女性的筛查参与率。