Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria.
Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria.
Int Wound J. 2018 Jun;15(3):441-453. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12885. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
Standard best practice for the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VLUs) is compression bandaging of the lower leg to reduce hydrostatic pressure. There is considerable variation in reported healing rates when using this gold-standard approach; therefore, a systematic and robust evaluation of other interventions is required. Exercise interventions, in addition to standard compression therapy, could improve wound-healing time and prevent their recurrence. We have conducted a systematic review to examine the effects of exercise on wound characteristics, including time to heal, size and recurrence, pain, quality of life, adverse events, and economic outcomes. This review was registered with PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016046407. A systematic search of Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and PEDro was conducted on January 30, 2017, for randomised control trials to examine the effects of exercise on time to heal, size and recurrence, pain, quality of life, adverse events, and economic outcomes. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, but all had design flaws leading to biases, most commonly performance and selective reporting bias. Three studies compared a progressive resistance exercise programme (PREG) plus compression with compression alone for a period of 12 weeks. Low-quality evidence indicates the following: possibly no difference in the proportion of ulcers healed (risk ratio [RR] 1.14, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.84, I 36%; 3 trials, 116 participants); probably no difference in quality of life (mean difference [MD] 3 points better on 100 point scale with exercise, 95% CI -1.89 to 7.89, 1 trial, 59 participants); possible increase in the risk of adverse events with exercise (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.85, 1 RCT, 40 participants); and no difference in ankle range of motion and calf muscle pump. Evidence was downgraded due to susceptibility to bias and imprecision. Recurrence, pain, and economic outcomes were not measured in these trials, and time to healing was measured but not fully reported in 1 trial. We are uncertain of the effects of other interventions (community-based exercise and behaviour modification, ten thousand steps, supervised vs unsupervised exercise) due to the availability of low- or very low-quality evidence only from single trials. The review highlights the need for further research, with larger sample sizes, to properly address the significance of the effect of exercise on VLU wound characteristics.
治疗静脉性腿部溃疡(VLU)的标准最佳实践是对小腿进行压缩包扎,以降低静水压力。当使用这种金标准方法时,报告的愈合率有很大差异;因此,需要对其他干预措施进行系统和稳健的评估。运动干预措施除了标准的压缩治疗外,还可以缩短伤口愈合时间并预防其复发。我们进行了系统评价,以检查运动对伤口特征的影响,包括愈合时间、大小和复发、疼痛、生活质量、不良事件和经济结果。本综述在 PROSPERO 2016 中进行了注册:CRD42016046407。于 2017 年 1 月 30 日,在 Ovid Medline、Ovid EMBASE、Ovid CINAHL、The Cochrane Library、PsycINFO、Web of Science 和 PEDro 中进行了系统检索,以查找随机对照试验,以检查运动对愈合时间、大小和复发、疼痛、生活质量、不良事件和经济结果的影响。有 6 项研究符合纳入标准,但所有研究都存在设计缺陷,导致偏倚,最常见的是表现和选择性报告偏倚。有 3 项研究比较了渐进式抗阻运动方案(PREG)加压缩与单纯压缩 12 周的效果。低质量证据表明:溃疡愈合比例可能没有差异(风险比 [RR] 1.14,95%CI 0.71 至 1.84,I 36%;3 项试验,116 名参与者);生活质量可能没有差异(运动后 100 分制上的 3 分更好,95%CI-1.89 至 7.89,1 项试验,59 名参与者);运动时不良事件的风险可能增加(OR 1.32,95%CI 0.95 至 1.85,1 项 RCT,40 名参与者);踝关节活动度和小腿肌肉泵功能无差异。由于易受偏倚和不精确性的影响,证据被降级。这些试验未测量复发、疼痛和经济结果,1 项试验测量了愈合时间,但未完全报告。由于仅来自单一试验的低质量或极低质量证据,我们不确定其他干预措施(基于社区的运动和行为改变、万步走、监督与非监督运动)的效果。本综述强调需要进一步研究,以更大的样本量,正确评估运动对 VLU 伤口特征的影响的重要性。