• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

六个月后的明智育儿:实施交付如何影响随访时的项目效果。

Parenting Wisely Six Months Later: How Implementation Delivery Impacts Program Effects at Follow-Up.

作者信息

Stalker Katie Cotter, Rose Roderick A, Bacallao Martica, Smokowski Paul R

机构信息

Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Prev. 2018 Apr;39(2):129-153. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0495-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10935-017-0495-2
PMID:29453502
Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of the Parenting Wisely (PW) program 6 months post intervention and assessed differences based on delivery format. Using a quasi-experimental design, parents (N = 311) participated in the PW program in one of five formats (i.e., parents-only intensive workshop, parents-only 5-week group, parents and adolescents 5-week group, parent and adolescent online, and parent-only online format). An additional 53 parents served as a comparison group. We used the McMaster Family Assessment Device, the Child Behavior Checklist, and the Violent Behavior Checklist to measure family functioning, parenting, and adolescent behavior. Relative to the comparison group, at 6 month follow-up parents who participated in PW reported increases in confidence in their parenting skills, decreases in conflicts with their adolescents, and decreases in adolescent externalizing and violent behavior. Mechanisms of change analyses supported the conceptual model that program effects were related to child behavior changes by influencing positive parenting and decreasing negative family dynamics. PW effectiveness did not vary substantially by delivery format, except for the intensive workshop format, which was less effective than other formats. These findings extend research on PW to include evidence of sustained program effects on adolescent externalizing and violent behaviors in an ethnically diverse, socioeconomically disadvantaged sample. Study findings are relevant to agencies and clinicians who are seeking to implement an evidence-based, flexible parent-training program.

摘要

我们评估了“明智育儿”(PW)项目干预6个月后的效果,并根据实施形式评估了差异。采用准实验设计,311名家长以五种形式之一参与了PW项目(即仅家长参加的强化工作坊、仅家长参加的为期5周的小组、家长和青少年共同参加的为期5周的小组、家长和青少年在线形式、仅家长在线形式)。另外53名家长作为对照组。我们使用麦克马斯特家庭评估工具、儿童行为清单和暴力行为清单来衡量家庭功能、育儿方式和青少年行为。与对照组相比,在6个月的随访中,参与PW项目的家长报告称他们育儿技能的信心增强、与青少年的冲突减少、青少年的外化行为和暴力行为减少。变化机制分析支持了这样的概念模型,即项目效果通过影响积极的育儿方式和减少负面的家庭动态与儿童行为变化相关。PW项目的效果在实施形式上没有显著差异,但强化工作坊形式除外,其效果不如其他形式。这些发现扩展了对PW项目的研究,以包括在一个种族多样化、社会经济处于不利地位的样本中,该项目对青少年外化行为和暴力行为产生持续影响的证据。研究结果与寻求实施基于证据的、灵活的家长培训项目的机构和临床医生相关。

相似文献

1
Parenting Wisely Six Months Later: How Implementation Delivery Impacts Program Effects at Follow-Up.六个月后的明智育儿:实施交付如何影响随访时的项目效果。
J Prim Prev. 2018 Apr;39(2):129-153. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0495-2.
2
Parent and adolescent effects of a universal group program for the parenting of adolescents.一项针对青少年养育的通用团体项目对父母及青少年的影响
Prev Sci. 2015 May;16(4):609-20. doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0516-9.
3
Internet-Assisted Parent Training Intervention for Disruptive Behavior in 4-Year-Old Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.互联网辅助家长训练干预对 4 岁儿童行为障碍的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;73(4):378-87. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.3411.
4
Parenting adolescents with ADHD: evaluation of a psychoeducation group.对患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的青少年进行养育:一项心理教育小组评估
Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Sep;38(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00110-4.
5
Intervention Effectiveness of The Incredible Years: New Insights Into Sociodemographic and Intervention-Based Moderators.《非凡岁月》的干预效果:社会人口统计学及基于干预的调节因素新见解
Behav Ther. 2017 Jan;48(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
6
Comparing an Emotion- and a Behavior-Focused Parenting Program as Part of a Multsystemic Intervention for Child Conduct Problems.比较以情绪为中心和以行为为中心的育儿计划,作为针对儿童行为问题的多系统干预的一部分。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016;45(3):320-34. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.963855. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
7
Technology-assisted intervention for parents of adolescents in residential substance use treatment: protocol of an open trial and pilot randomized trial.针对住院物质使用治疗中青少年父母的技术辅助干预:开放试验和试点随机试验方案
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13722-016-0067-4.
8
'Living with Teenagers': feasibility study of a peer-led parenting intervention for socially disadvantaged families with adolescent children.《与青少年一起生活》:一项针对社会劣势家庭青少年子女的同伴主导型养育干预措施的可行性研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2014 Aug;99(8):731-7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304936. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
9
Detecting effects of the indicated prevention Programme for Externalizing Problem behaviour (PEP) on child symptoms, parenting, and parental quality of life in a randomized controlled trial.在一项随机对照试验中,检测针对外化问题行为的指定预防计划(PEP)对儿童症状、养育方式和父母生活质量的影响。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2010 Jan;38(1):95-112. doi: 10.1017/S1352465809990440.
10
Feasibility and Acceptability of an Electronic Parenting Skills Intervention for Parents of Alcohol-Using Adolescent Trauma Patients.针对饮酒青少年创伤患者家长的电子育儿技能干预的可行性与可接受性
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Sep;25(9):833-839. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0201. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
How are motivational interviewing techniques associated with US healthcare employees' mental health help-seeking behaviours when using the interactive screening programme.在使用交互式筛查项目时,动机性访谈技巧与美国医疗保健员工的心理健康求助行为有怎样的关联?
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Dec 22;2(2):e001293. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001293. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Families in transition (FIT) study protocol: feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effects of a group-based parent training in parents of youth in psychiatric residential treatment.转型家庭(FIT)研究方案:基于小组的家长培训在精神科住院治疗青少年父母中可行性、可接受性和初步效果。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 30;14(5):e080603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080603.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Overview of meta-analyses of the prevention of mental health, substance use, and conduct problems.预防心理健康、物质使用和行为问题的荟萃分析概述
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:243-73. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185524. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
2
Long-term impact of prevention programs to promote effective parenting: lasting effects but uncertain processes.预防项目对促进有效育儿的长期影响:持久效果但不确定过程。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:299-329. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131619.
3
Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world.
Refining Parent SMART: User feedback to optimize a multi-modal intervention.
精炼家长 SMART:用户反馈以优化多模态干预。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Nov;166:209405. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209405. Epub 2024 May 19.
4
Parent SMART: Effects of residential treatment and an adjunctive parenting intervention on behavioral health services utilization.家长 SMART 研究:住院治疗和辅助养育干预对行为健康服务利用的影响。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Nov;166:209399. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209399. Epub 2024 May 16.
5
A pilot randomized control trial on the feasibility, acceptability, and initial effects of a digital-assisted parenting intervention for promoting mental health in Malaysian adolescents.一项关于数字辅助育儿干预对促进马来西亚青少年心理健康的可行性、可接受性和初步效果的试点随机对照试验。
Digit Health. 2024 Apr 24;10:20552076241249572. doi: 10.1177/20552076241249572. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Engaging Parents in Technology-Assisted Interventions for Childhood Adversity: Systematic Review.让家长参与儿童逆境的技术辅助干预:系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 19;26:e43994. doi: 10.2196/43994.
7
Early Emotion Development Intervention Improves Mental Health Outcomes in Low-Income, High-Risk Community Children.早期情绪发展干预改善低收入高风险社区儿童的心理健康状况
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Jan 14. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01639-1.
8
Parent SMART (Substance Misuse in Adolescents in Residential Treatment): Protocol of a Randomized Effectiveness Trial of a Technology-Assisted Parenting Intervention.家长SMART(住院治疗青少年药物滥用):一项技术辅助育儿干预随机有效性试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Feb 28;11(2):e35934. doi: 10.2196/35934.
9
Parent Smart: Effects of a Technology-Assisted Intervention for Parents of Adolescents in Residential Substance Use Treatment on Parental Monitoring and Communication.家长智能:一项针对接受住院药物使用治疗的青少年家长的技术辅助干预对家长监督和沟通的影响。
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2021;6(4):459-472. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2021.1961644. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
10
Parent SMART (Substance Misuse in Adolescents in Residential Treatment): Pilot randomized trial of a technology-assisted parenting intervention.家长明智计划(住院治疗青少年中的药物滥用):一项技术辅助养育干预的试点随机试验。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Aug;127:108457. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108457. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
缺失数据分析:使其在现实世界中发挥作用。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:549-76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530.
4
Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation.弥合预防研究与实践之间的差距:传播与实施的互动系统框架。
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):171-81. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z.
5
A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness.对与家长培训项目有效性相关的组成部分的荟萃分析综述。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 May;36(4):567-89. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9201-9. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
6
Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research.心理治疗研究中的改变中介因素与机制。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:1-27. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432.
7
A meta-analysis of parent training: moderators and follow-up effects.家长培训的元分析:调节因素与随访效果
Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Jan;26(1):86-104. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Nov 8.
8
The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: resolving tensions between fidelity and fit.预防干预措施的文化适应:解决保真度与适应性之间的矛盾
Prev Sci. 2004 Mar;5(1):41-5. doi: 10.1023/b:prev.0000013980.12412.cd.
9
Family-strengthening approaches for the prevention of youth problem behaviors.预防青少年问题行为的家庭强化方法。
Am Psychol. 2003 Jun-Jul;58(6-7):457-465. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.6-7.457.
10
The triple P-positive parenting program: a comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed behavioral family intervention for parents of children with early onset conduct problems.三P积极育儿项目:针对早发性品行问题儿童家长的强化型、标准型和自我指导型行为家庭干预比较
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Aug;68(4):624-40.