• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

已注册的复制报告:迪克斯特休伊斯和范·凯尼彭伯格(1998 年)。

Registered Replication Report: Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998).

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;13(2):268-294. doi: 10.1177/1745691618755704. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1177/1745691618755704
PMID:29463182
Abstract

Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998) reported that participants primed with a category associated with intelligence ("professor") subsequently performed 13% better on a trivia test than participants primed with a category associated with a lack of intelligence ("soccer hooligans"). In two unpublished replications of this study designed to verify the appropriate testing procedures, Dijksterhuis, van Knippenberg, and Holland observed a smaller difference between conditions (2%-3%) as well as a gender difference: Men showed the effect (9.3% and 7.6%), but women did not (0.3% and -0.3%). The procedure used in those replications served as the basis for this multilab Registered Replication Report. A total of 40 laboratories collected data for this project, and 23 of these laboratories met all inclusion criteria. Here we report the meta-analytic results for those 23 direct replications (total N = 4,493), which tested whether performance on a 30-item general-knowledge trivia task differed between these two priming conditions (results of supplementary analyses of the data from all 40 labs, N = 6,454, are also reported). We observed no overall difference in trivia performance between participants primed with the "professor" category and those primed with the "hooligan" category (0.14%) and no moderation by gender.

摘要

迪克斯特休伊斯和范凯尼彭伯格(1998 年)报告称,参与者在与智力相关的类别(“教授”)上得到启动后,在琐事测试中的表现比在与智力缺乏相关的类别(“足球流氓”)上得到启动后的表现要好 13%。在这项研究的两次未发表的重复实验中,旨在验证适当的测试程序,迪克斯特休伊斯、范凯尼彭伯格和霍兰德观察到条件之间的差异较小(2%-3%)以及性别差异:男性表现出这种影响(9.3%和 7.6%),而女性则没有(0.3%和-0.3%)。这些重复使用的程序作为这个多实验室注册重复报告的基础。共有 40 个实验室为这个项目收集了数据,其中 23 个实验室符合所有纳入标准。在这里,我们报告了这 23 个直接复制实验的荟萃分析结果(总 N=4493),这些实验检验了在这两种启动条件下,在 30 项一般知识琐事任务上的表现是否不同(还报告了对来自所有 40 个实验室的数据进行的补充分析的结果,N=6454)。我们没有观察到在琐事表现上参与者在“教授”类别上得到启动和在“流氓”类别上得到启动之间存在总体差异(0.14%),也没有性别调节。

相似文献

1
Registered Replication Report: Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998).已注册的复制报告:迪克斯特休伊斯和范·凯尼彭伯格(1998 年)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;13(2):268-294. doi: 10.1177/1745691618755704. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
2
Priming intelligent behavior: an elusive phenomenon.启动智能行为:一种难以捉摸的现象。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 24;8(4):e56515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056515. Print 2013.
3
Effect of social category priming on personal attitudes.社会类别启动对个人态度的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2003 Jul;14(4):315-9. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.14451.
4
Category and stereotype activation revisited.再谈类别与刻板印象激活
Scand J Psychol. 2006 Dec;47(6):513-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00523.x.
5
Is intelligence enhanced by letter priming? A failure to replicate the results of Ciani and Sheldon (2010).字母启动会提升智力吗?对西亚尼和谢尔登(2010年)研究结果的复制失败。
Psychol Rep. 2013 Apr;112(2):533-44. doi: 10.2466/04.03.PR0.112.2.533-544.
6
Estimates of emotional and psychometric intelligence: evidence for gender-based stereotypes.情绪智力和心理测量智力的评估:基于性别的刻板印象证据。
J Soc Psychol. 2004 Apr;144(2):149-62. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.144.2.149-162.
7
Inclusiveness and crossed categorization: effects on co-joined category evaluations of in-group and out-group primes.包容性与交叉分类:对内群体和外群体启动因素的联合类别评价的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;42(Pt 1):25-38. doi: 10.1348/014466603763276108.
8
A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect.多实验室预先注册的自我损耗效应复制研究。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):546-73. doi: 10.1177/1745691616652873.
9
Gender differences in self-rated and partner-rated multiple intelligences: a Portuguese replication.自评与伴侣评价的多元智能中的性别差异:一项葡萄牙的重复研究。
J Psychol. 2006 Nov;140(6):591-602. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.140.6.591-602.
10
Registered Replication Report: Study 1 From Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon (2002).注册报告再现:芬克尔、拉斯布鲁特、熊岛、汉农(2002)的研究 1
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Sep;11(5):750-764. doi: 10.1177/1745691616664694.

引用本文的文献

1
The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science.复制数据库:记录心理科学的可复制性。
J Open Psychol Data. 2024 Sep 11;12:8. doi: 10.5334/jopd.101. eCollection 2024.
2
Heterogeneity in effect size estimates.效应量估计中的异质性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 6;121(32):e2403490121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2403490121. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Protocol for a meta-analysis of stereotype threat in African Americans.非裔美国人刻板印象威胁的元分析方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 24;19(7):e0306030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306030. eCollection 2024.
4
High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable.新发现的社会行为研究结果具有高度可复制性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Feb;8(2):311-319. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01749-9. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
5
When your goals inspire my goals: the role of effort, personal value, and inference in goal contagion.当你的目标激发我的目标:努力、个人价值观和推断在目标感染中的作用。
Compr Results Soc Psychol. 2020 Jun 8;4(1):78-108. doi: 10.1080/23743603.2020.1767502.
6
The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network.心理科学加速器:通过分布式协作网络推动心理学发展。
Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;1(4):501-515. doi: 10.1177/2515245918797607. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
7
The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture.实验心理学家的心理学:克服认知局限以改进研究:第47届弗雷德里克·巴特利特爵士讲座
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jan;73(1):1-19. doi: 10.1177/1747021819886519. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
Respectable Challenges to Respectable Theory: Cognitive Dissonance Theory Requires Conceptualization Clarification and Operational Tools.对可靠理论的严峻挑战:认知失调理论需要概念澄清和操作工具。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 29;10:1189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01189. eCollection 2019.
9
Teaching Psychology Research Methodology Across the Curriculum to Promote Undergraduate Publication: An Eight-Course Structure and Two Helpful Practices.跨课程教授心理学研究方法以促进本科生发表论文:一种八门课程的结构及两种实用方法
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2295. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02295. eCollection 2018.