Suppr超能文献

慢性危重症患者在重症监护后出现的疲劳-多维疲劳量表(MFI-20)的信度和效度。

Fatigue in chronically critically ill patients following intensive care - reliability and validity of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20).

机构信息

Department of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Feb 20;16(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0862-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fatigue often occurs as long-term complication in chronically critically ill (CCI) patients after prolonged intensive care treatment. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) has been established as valid instrument to measure fatigue in a wide range of medical illnesses. Regarding the measurement of fatigue in CCI patients, the psychometric properties of the MFI-20 have not been investigated so far. Thus, the present study examines reliability and validity of the MFI-20 in CCI patients.

METHODS

A convenience sample of n = 195 patients with Critical Illness Polyneuropathy (CIP) or Myopathy (CIM) were recruited via personal contact within four weeks (t1) following the transfer from acute care ICU to post-acute ICU at a large rehabilitation hospital. N = 113 (median age 61.1 yrs., 72.6% men) patients were again contacted via telephone three (t2) and six (t3) months following the transfer to post-acute ICU. The MFI-20, the Euro-Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3 L) and the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders DSM-IV (SCID-I) were applied within this prospective cohort study.

RESULTS

The internal consistency Cronbach's α was adequate for the MFI-total and all but the subscale Reduced Motivation (RM) (range: .50-.91). Item-to-total correlations (range: .22-.80) indicated item redundancy for the subscale RM. Confirmatory Factor analyses (CFAs) revealed poor model fit for the original 5-factor model of the MFI-20 (t2/t3, Confirmatory Fit Index, CFI = .783/ .834; Tucker-Lewis Index, TLI = .751/ .809; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, RMSEA = .112/ .103). Among the alternative models (1-, 2-, 3-factor models), the data best fit to a 3-factor solution summarizing the highly correlated factors General -/ Physical Fatigue/ Reduced Activity (GF/ PF/ RA) (t2/ t3, CFI = .878/ .896, TLI = .846/ .869, RMSEA = .089/ .085, 90% Confidence Interval .073-.104/ .066-.104). The MFI-total score significantly correlated with the health-related quality of life (range: -.65-(-).66) and the diagnosis of major depression (range: .27-.37).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present sample of CCI patients, a reliable and valid factor structure of the MFI-20 could not be ascertained. Especially the subscale RM should be revised. Since the factors GF, PF and RA cannot be separated from each other and the unclear factorial structure in the present sample of CCI patients, the MFI-20 is not recommended for use in this context.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Registration DRKS00003386 . Registered 13 December 2011, retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

慢性危重病(CCI)患者在经历长时间的强化治疗后,常会出现长期并发症,如疲劳。多维疲劳量表(MFI-20)已被确立为一种有效的测量工具,可用于测量多种医学疾病中的疲劳。关于 CCI 患者的疲劳测量,MFI-20 的心理测量特性尚未得到研究。因此,本研究旨在检验 MFI-20 在 CCI 患者中的可靠性和有效性。

方法

通过个人联系,在急性重症监护病房(ICU)转至大型康复医院的康复 ICU 后四周内(t1),方便地招募了患有危重病性多发性神经病(CIP)或肌病(CIM)的 n=195 例患者。n=113 例(中位数年龄 61.1 岁,72.6%为男性)患者在转至康复 ICU 后三个月(t2)和六个月(t3)时再次通过电话联系。在这个前瞻性队列研究中,应用了多维疲劳量表(MFI-20)、欧洲生命质量量表(EQ-5D-3L)和精神障碍诊断和统计手册第四版(DSM-IV)的结构临床访谈(SCID-I)。

结果

MFI 总分和除了减少动机(RM)子量表(范围:.50-.91)之外的所有子量表的内部一致性 Cronbach's α 均足够。项目与总分的相关性(范围:.22-.80)表明 RM 子量表的项目冗余。验证性因素分析(CFAs)显示 MFI-20 的原始 5 因素模型拟合不佳(t2/t3,验证性拟合指数,CFI=0.783/0.834;Tucker-Lewis 指数,TLI=0.751/0.809;近似均方根误差,RMSEA=0.112/0.103)。在替代模型(1-、2-、3-因子模型)中,数据最适合概括高度相关的一般疲劳/身体疲劳/活动减少(GF/PF/RA)因子的 3 因子解决方案(t2/t3,CFI=0.878/0.896,TLI=0.846/0.869,RMSEA=0.089/0.085,90%置信区间.073-.104/.066-.104)。MFI 总分与健康相关的生活质量(范围:-.65-(-).66)和主要抑郁症的诊断(范围:.27-.37)显著相关。

结论

在本 CCI 患者样本中,MFI-20 的可靠和有效因子结构无法确定。特别是 RM 子量表应进行修订。由于 GF、PF 和 RA 因子彼此不能分离,并且在本 CCI 患者样本中的因子结构不清楚,因此不建议在该环境中使用 MFI-20。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册 DRKS00003386。于 2011 年 12 月 13 日注册,为回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdf8/5819670/0401713e5cd2/12955_2018_862_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验