• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青年进行空气传导前庭诱发肌源性电位测试时高声暴露的影响。

Effects of High Sound Exposure During Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children and Young Adults.

机构信息

Department of Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):269-277. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000484.

DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000484
PMID:29466264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5826614/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing is increasingly utilized in pediatric vestibular evaluations due to its diagnostic capability to identify otolith dysfunction and feasibility of testing. However, there is evidence demonstrating that the high-intensity stimulation level required to elicit a reliable VEMP response causes acoustic trauma in adults. Despite utility of VEMP testing in children, similar findings are unknown. It is hypothesized that increased sound exposure may exist in children because differences in ear-canal volume (ECV) compared with adults, and the effect of stimulus parameters (e.g., signal duration and intensity) will alter exposure levels delivered to a child's ear. The objectives of this study are to (1) measure peak to peak equivalent sound pressure levels (peSPL) in children with normal hearing (CNH) and young adults with normal hearing (ANH) using high-intensity VEMP stimuli, (2) determine the effect of ECV on peSPL and calculate a safe exposure level for VEMP, and (3) assess whether cochlear changes exist after VEMP exposure.

DESIGN

This was a 2-phase approach. Fifteen CNH and 12 ANH participated in phase I. Equivalent ECV was measured. In 1 ear, peSPL was recorded for 5 seconds at 105 to 125 dB SPL, in 5-dB increments for 500- and 750-Hz tone bursts. Recorded peSPL values (accounting for stimulus duration) were then used to calculate safe sound energy exposure values for VEMP testing using the 132-dB recommended energy allowance from the 2003 European Union Guidelines. Fifteen CNH and 10 ANH received cervical and ocular VEMP testing in 1 ear in phase II. Subjects completed tympanometry, pre- and postaudiometric threshold testing, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and questionnaire addressing subjective otologic symptoms to study the effect of VEMP exposure on cochlear function.

RESULTS

(1) In response to high-intensity stimulation levels (e.g., 125 dB SPL), CNH had significantly higher peSPL measurements and smaller ECVs compared with ANH. (2) A significant linear relationship between equivalent ECV (as measured by diagnostic tympanometry) and peSPL exists and has an effect on total sound energy exposure level; based on data from phase I, 120 dB SPL was determined to be an acoustically safe stimulation level for testing in children. (3) Using calculated safe stimulation level for VEMP testing, there were no significant effect of VEMP exposure on cochlear function (as measured by audiometric thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude levels, or subjective symptoms) in CNH and ANH.

CONCLUSIONS

peSPL sound recordings in children's ears are significantly higher (~3 dB) than that in adults in response to high-intensity VEMP stimuli that are commonly practiced. Equivalent ECV contributes to peSPL delivered to the ear during VEMP testing and should be considered to determine safe acoustic VEMP stimulus parameters; children with smaller ECVs are at risk for unsafe sound exposure during routine VEMP testing, and stimuli should not exceed 120 dB SPL. Using 120 dB SPL stimulus level for children during VEMP testing yields no change to cochlear function and reliable VEMP responses.

摘要

目的

由于前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMP)测试具有识别耳石功能障碍的诊断能力和测试可行性,因此在儿科前庭评估中越来越多地使用该测试。然而,有证据表明,为了获得可靠的 VEMP 反应而需要的高强度刺激水平会在成人中造成听力损伤。尽管 VEMP 测试在儿童中具有实用性,但类似的发现尚不清楚。据推测,由于与成人相比,儿童的耳道容积(ECV)存在差异,以及刺激参数(例如,信号持续时间和强度)的影响,因此可能会对儿童耳朵的暴露水平产生影响。本研究的目的是:(1)使用高强度 VEMP 刺激物测量正常听力(CNH)的儿童和正常听力的年轻成人(ANH)的峰间等效声压级(peSPL);(2)确定 ECV 对 peSPL 的影响,并计算 VEMP 的安全暴露水平;(3)评估 VEMP 暴露后耳蜗是否发生变化。

设计

这是一个两阶段的方法。第 I 阶段有 15 名 CNH 和 12 名 ANH 参加。测量等效 ECV。在一只耳朵中,以 5-dB 增量记录 500-750-Hz 啁啾声的 105 至 125 dB SPL 的 5 秒 peSPL。然后使用记录的 peSPL 值(考虑到刺激持续时间),根据 2003 年欧盟指南中推荐的 132dB 能量津贴,计算出用于 VEMP 测试的安全声音能量暴露值。第 I 阶段有 15 名 CNH 和 10 名 ANH 在一只耳朵中接受了颈性和眼性 VEMP 测试。受测者完成了鼓室图测试、测试前后听力阈值测试、畸变产物耳声发射以及问卷调查,以研究 VEMP 暴露对耳蜗功能的影响。

结果

(1)在高强度刺激水平(例如 125 dB SPL)下,与 ANH 相比,CNH 的 peSPL 测量值明显更高,ECV 更小。(2)等效 ECV(通过诊断性鼓室图测量)与 peSPL 之间存在显著的线性关系,并且对总声能暴露水平有影响;基于第 I 阶段的数据,确定 120 dB SPL 是用于儿童测试的安全刺激水平。(3)使用计算出的 VEMP 测试安全刺激水平,在 CNH 和 ANH 中,VEMP 暴露对耳蜗功能(通过听力阈值、畸变产物耳声发射幅度水平或主观症状测量)没有显著影响。

结论

与成人相比,儿童对常用于 VEMP 测试的高强度 VEMP 刺激的反应中,peSPL 记录的声音要高约 3dB。等效 ECV 有助于 VEMP 测试期间传递到耳朵的声音,并应考虑确定安全的声学 VEMP 刺激参数;ECV 较小的儿童在常规 VEMP 测试中存在不安全声音暴露的风险,刺激不应超过 120 dB SPL。在 VEMP 测试中对儿童使用 120 dB SPL 刺激水平不会对耳蜗功能产生影响,并可获得可靠的 VEMP 反应。

相似文献

1
Effects of High Sound Exposure During Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children and Young Adults.儿童和青年进行空气传导前庭诱发肌源性电位测试时高声暴露的影响。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):269-277. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000484.
2
Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Thresholds, Frequency Tuning, and Effects of Sound Exposure.空气传导前庭诱发肌源性电位测试在儿童、青少年和青年中的应用:阈值、频率调谐以及声音暴露的影响。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jan/Feb;40(1):192-203. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000607.
3
Big Stimulus, Little Ears: Safety in Administering Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Children.大刺激,小耳朵:儿童前庭诱发肌源性电位检查的安全性
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 May;28(5):395-403. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15097.
4
Effect of Real-Ear Adjusted Stimuli on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Variability in Children and Young Adults.真耳调试刺激对儿童和青年成年人前庭诱发肌源性电位可变性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(4):854-864. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001333. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
5
Is There a Safe Level for Recording Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential? Evidence From Cochlear and Hearing Function Tests.记录前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMP)是否存在安全水平?来自耳蜗和听力功能测试的证据。
Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun;40(3):493-500. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000646.
6
Changes in cochlear function related to acoustic stimulation of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential stimulation.与颈前庭诱发肌源性电位刺激的听觉刺激相关的耳蜗功能变化。
Hear Res. 2016 Oct;340:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.12.022. Epub 2015 Dec 25.
7
Vestibular myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimuli at safe acoustic intensity levels retain optimal diagnostic properties for superior canal dehiscence syndrome.在安全声学强度水平下,由气导刺激诱发的前庭肌源性电位对上半规管裂综合征保留了最佳诊断特性。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Jan;139(1):11-17. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1536297. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
8
Effects of acoustic stimuli used for vestibular evoked myogenic potential studies on the cochlear function.用于前庭诱发肌源性电位研究的声刺激对耳蜗功能的影响。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Sep;34(7):1186-92. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829ce7b4.
9
Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and Wideband Acoustic Immittance.人工耳蜗植入对前庭诱发肌源性电位和宽带声导抗的影响。
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1111-1124. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000831.
10
Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.耳蜗听力障碍的评估:正常畸变产物耳声发射测量
Ear Hear. 2007 Dec;28(6):778-92. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181576755.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Decrease in DPOAE Levels After VEMP Testing in Clinical Patients Referred to the Vertigo Outpatient Clinic.眩晕门诊临床患者行VEMP测试后DPOAE水平下降情况的评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 17;14(8):2766. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082766.
2
A meta-analysis comparing the performance of narrowband CE-Chirp and 500 Hz tone burst stimuli in recording cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP).一项比较窄带 CE-Chirp 和 500Hz 啁啾刺激在记录颈性前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)方面性能的荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 26;14(1):14707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64402-z.
3
Electrode Montage for Bilateral Cervical Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing.

本文引用的文献

1
Safe Use of Acoustic Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential Stimuli: Protocol and Patient-Specific Considerations.听觉前庭诱发肌源性电位刺激的安全使用:方案及针对患者的注意事项
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Sep;28(8):708-717. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16071.
2
Big Stimulus, Little Ears: Safety in Administering Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Children.大刺激,小耳朵:儿童前庭诱发肌源性电位检查的安全性
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 May;28(5):395-403. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15097.
3
Changes in cochlear function related to acoustic stimulation of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential stimulation.
用于双侧颈前庭诱发肌源性电位测试的电极组合
J Am Acad Audiol. 2024 Jul;35(7-08):165-171. doi: 10.1055/a-2250-3096. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
4
Effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential in children.声刺激强度对儿童气导前庭诱发肌源性电位的影响。
Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 11;13:996246. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.996246. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of Age on Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials Using 750 Hz Tone Burst Stimuli among Healthy Adults.年龄对健康成年人使用750赫兹短纯音刺激时颈前庭诱发肌源性电位和眼前庭诱发肌源性电位的影响。
Malays J Med Sci. 2022 Aug;29(4):53-64. doi: 10.21315/mjms2022.29.4.6. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
6
Stability of Vestibular Testing in Children With Hearing Loss.听力损失儿童前庭测试的稳定性。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Dec 5;31(4):1155-1166. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00257. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
7
Effects of aging on ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential using ER-3A insert earphone and B81 bone vibrator.使用ER-3A插入式耳机和B81骨振动器研究衰老对眼前庭诱发肌源性电位的影响。
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 25;13:956996. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.956996. eCollection 2022.
8
Age Effects of Bone Conduction Vibration Vestibular-evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) Using B81 and Impulse Hammer Stimuli.骨导振动前庭肌源性电位(VEMPs)的年龄效应:B81 和脉冲锤刺激
Ear Hear. 2021 Sep/Oct;42(5):1328-1337. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001024.
9
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) Test-retest Reliability in Children.前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMP)测试在儿童中的重复性研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Sep;41(8):e1052-e1059. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002703.
10
Optimization of Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing Using an Impulse Hammer in Adults, Adolescents, and Children.成人、青少年和儿童使用脉冲锤进行颈和眼前庭诱发肌源性电位测试的优化。
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Jul;41(6):817-827. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002632.
与颈前庭诱发肌源性电位刺激的听觉刺激相关的耳蜗功能变化。
Hear Res. 2016 Oct;340:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.12.022. Epub 2015 Dec 25.
4
Sudden Bilateral Hearing Loss After Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.颈性和眼性前庭诱发肌源性电位后突发双侧听力损失
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jul;36(6):961-4. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000764.
5
The hidden loss of otolithic function in children with profound sensorineural hearing loss.重度感音神经性听力损失儿童耳石功能的隐匿性丧失
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jun;79(6):852-857. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
6
Measurement of the sound intensity during suction of middle-ear fluid following myringotomy.鼓膜切开术后中耳积液抽吸时声音强度的测量。
J Laryngol Otol. 2014 Jul;128(7):604-11. doi: 10.1017/S0022215114001352. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
7
Safe levels of acoustic stimulation: comment on '"effects of acoustic stimuli used for vestibular evoked myogenic potential studies on the cochlear function '".安全水平的声刺激:评“用于前庭诱发肌源性电位研究的声刺激对耳蜗功能的影响”
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jun;35(5):932-3. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000289.
8
Rotatory and collic vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.正常听力和听力障碍儿童的旋转和眼震前庭诱发肌源性电位测试。
Ear Hear. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):e21-32. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182a6ca91.
9
Effects of acoustic stimuli used for vestibular evoked myogenic potential studies on the cochlear function.用于前庭诱发肌源性电位研究的声刺激对耳蜗功能的影响。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Sep;34(7):1186-92. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829ce7b4.
10
Effects of age on the tuning of the cVEMP and oVEMP.年龄对 cVEMP 和 oVEMP 调谐的影响。
Ear Hear. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):e65-73. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828fc9f2.