Fuqua, Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Palliative Medicine Service, New York, New York, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jun;55(6):1540-1545. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
Negative attitudes toward hospice care might prevent patients with cancer from discussing and choosing hospice as they approach end of life. When making a decision, people often naturally focus on either expected benefits or the avoidance of harm. Behavioral research has demonstrated that framing information in an incongruent manner with patients' underlying motivational focus reduces their negative attitudes toward a disliked option.
Our study tests this communication technique with cancer patients, aiming to reduce negative attitudes toward a potentially beneficial but often-disliked option, that is, hospice care.
Patients (n = 42) with active cancer of different types and/or stages completed a paper survey. Participants read a vignette about a patient with advanced cancer and a limited prognosis. In the vignette, the physician's advice to enroll in a hospice program was randomized, creating a congruent message or an incongruent message with patients' underlying motivational focus (e.g., a congruent message for someone most interested in benefits focuses on the benefits of hospice, whereas an incongruent message for this patient focuses on avoiding harm). Patients' attitudes toward hospice were measured before and after receiving the physician's advice.
Regression analyses indicated that information framing significantly influenced patients with strong initial negative attitudes. Patients were more likely to reduce intensity of their initial negative attitude about hospice when receiving an incongruent message (b = -0.23; P < 0.01) than a congruent one (b = -0.13; P = 0.08).
This finding suggests a new theory-driven approach to conversations with cancer patients who may harbor negative reactions toward hospice care.
对临终关怀的负面态度可能会阻止癌症患者在接近生命末期时讨论和选择临终关怀。在做决策时,人们通常会自然而然地关注预期的收益或避免伤害。行为研究表明,以与患者潜在动机焦点不一致的方式构建信息,可以减少他们对不喜欢的选项的负面态度。
我们的研究在癌症患者中测试了这种沟通技巧,旨在减少对一种潜在有益但通常不受欢迎的选择(即临终关怀)的负面态度。
不同类型和/或阶段的活动性癌症患者(n=42)完成了纸质问卷调查。参与者阅读了一个关于患有晚期癌症和预后有限的患者的案例。在案例中,医生建议参加临终关怀计划的建议是随机的,创造了一个与患者潜在动机焦点一致的信息或不一致的信息(例如,对最关注收益的人来说,一致的信息集中在临终关怀的收益上,而对这个病人来说,不一致的信息则集中在避免伤害上)。在收到医生的建议之前和之后,测量了患者对临终关怀的态度。
回归分析表明,信息框架显著影响了初始负面态度强烈的患者。当患者收到不一致的信息(b=-0.23;P<0.01)而不是一致的信息(b=-0.13;P=0.08)时,他们更有可能减轻对临终关怀最初负面态度的强度。
这一发现为与可能对临终关怀有负面反应的癌症患者进行对话提供了一种新的基于理论的方法。