Nieder Carsten, Yobuta Rosalba, Mannsåker Bård, Dalhaug Astrid
Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
In Vivo. 2018 Mar-Apr;32(2):331-336. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11242.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Geriatric oncology practice should be based on dedicated studies and real-world experience. Therefore, we evaluated survival outcomes after palliative thoracic radiotherapy in octogenarian patients with lung cancer and analyzed prognostic factors.
We carried out a retrospective analysis of 51 patients with a median age of 83 years. Three different fractionation regimens were compared: two fractions of 8.5 Gy, 10 fractions of 3 Gy, and higher doses than 30 Gy (maximum biologically equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) was always lower than 50 Gy). No concomitant chemotherapy was prescribed. Patients with incomplete radiotherapy (16%) were included, in line with the intention-to-treat principle, i.e. based on prescribed rather than accumulated dose.
Median survival was 3.4 months. We observed a relatively high proportion of patients who received radiotherapy in the last 30 days of life (24%). Nevertheless, approximately 10% of patients were alive 3-5 years after treatment. Prognosis was similar for those with stage III and IV disease. Multivariate analysis identified four significant prognostic factors for shorter survival: reduced performance status, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥30 mg/l, leukocytosis, and prescribed radiation dose ≤30 Gy (EQD2=33 Gy). The three different radiotherapy regimens resulted in median survival of 2.4, 2.6 and 11.8 months, respectively.
Survival outcomes were highly variable. Given that survival after 10 fractions of 3 Gy was indistinguishable from that after two fractions of 8.5 Gy, we suggest that the latter regimen should be considered for patients with poor prognosis. Patients with favorable prognostic factors should be treated with higher radiation doses, e.g. 15 fractions of 3 Gy.
背景/目的:老年肿瘤学实践应基于专门研究和实际经验。因此,我们评估了老年肺癌患者姑息性胸部放疗后的生存结果,并分析了预后因素。
我们对51例中位年龄为83岁的患者进行了回顾性分析。比较了三种不同的分割方案:两个8.5 Gy分割、10个3 Gy分割以及高于30 Gy的剂量(2 Gy分割下的最大生物等效剂量(EQD2)始终低于50 Gy)。未开具同步化疗。根据意向性治疗原则纳入了放疗未完成的患者(16%),即基于处方剂量而非累积剂量。
中位生存期为3.4个月。我们观察到在生命的最后30天接受放疗的患者比例相对较高(24%)。然而,约10%的患者在治疗后3至5年仍存活。Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期疾病患者的预后相似。多因素分析确定了四个生存期较短的显著预后因素:体能状态下降、血清C反应蛋白(CRP)≥30 mg/l、白细胞增多以及处方放射剂量≤30 Gy(EQD2 = 33 Gy)。三种不同的放疗方案导致的中位生存期分别为2.4、2.6和11.8个月。
生存结果差异很大。鉴于10个3 Gy分割后的生存情况与两个8.5 Gy分割后的生存情况无差异,我们建议对于预后较差的患者应考虑后一种方案。具有良好预后因素的患者应接受更高的放射剂量治疗,例如15个3 Gy分割。