• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Targeting strategies of mHealth interventions for maternal health in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.中低收入国家孕产妇健康移动医疗干预措施的靶向策略:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 24;8(2):e019345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019345.
2
Assessing the Effect of mHealth Interventions in Improving Maternal and Neonatal Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.评估移动健康干预措施对改善低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇和新生儿护理的效果:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0154664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154664. eCollection 2016.
3
Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions Targeting Health Care Workers to Improve Pregnancy Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.针对医护人员的移动健康干预措施在低收入和中等收入国家改善妊娠结局的有效性:一项系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 19;18(8):e226. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5533.
4
Impact of mobile health (mHealth) interventions during the perinatal period for mothers in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家围产期母亲移动健康干预措施的影响:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Aug;17(8):1634-1667. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004022.
5
Impact of mHealth interventions on maternal, newborn, and child health from conception to 24 months postpartum in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.移动医疗干预对中低收入国家孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康的影响:从受孕到产后 24 个月的系统评价。
BMC Med. 2024 May 15;22(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03417-9.
6
Effect of mHealth in improving antenatal care utilization and skilled birth attendance in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.移动健康对改善低收入和中等收入国家产前护理利用及熟练接生服务的影响:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Jul;15(7):1778-1782. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003111.
7
Role of mHealth applications for improving antenatal and postnatal care in low and middle income countries: a systematic review.移动医疗应用在改善中低收入国家产前和产后护理中的作用:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 7;17(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2664-7.
8
Effects of mHealth Interventions on Improving Antenatal Care Visits and Skilled Delivery Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.移动医疗干预对改善中低收入国家产前保健就诊和熟练分娩护理的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 22;24(4):e34061. doi: 10.2196/34061.
9
mHealth Interventions in Low-Income Countries to Address Maternal Health: A Systematic Review.低收入国家的移动医疗干预措施在解决孕产妇健康问题方面的系统评价。
Ann Glob Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;82(5):922-935. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.09.001.
10
mHealth interventions targeting pregnancy intakes in low and lower-middle income countries: Systematic review.针对中低收入国家孕期摄入量的移动医疗干预措施:系统评价。
Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Apr;15(2):e12777. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12777. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's participation in household decision-making: Qualitative findings from the Shonjibon Trial in rural Bangladesh.女性参与家庭决策:孟加拉国农村Shonjibon试验的定性研究结果
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jun 17;4(6):e0002907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002907. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploring perceptions and operational considerations for use of a smartphone application to self-monitor blood pressure in pregnancy in Lombok, Indonesia: protocol for a qualitative study.探究在印度尼西亚龙目岛使用智能手机应用程序自我监测妊娠期间血压的认知和操作考虑因素:一项定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 18;13(12):e073875. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073875.
3
The Role of mHealth Interventions in Changing Gender Relations: Systematic Review of Qualitative Findings.移动健康干预在改变性别关系中的作用:定性研究结果的系统评价
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jul 21;9(3):e32330. doi: 10.2196/32330.
4
mHealth Interventions for Contraceptive Behavior Change in the United States: A Systematic Review.**标题**:美国促进避孕行为改变的移动医疗干预措施:系统评价。 **摘要**:背景:移动医疗(mHealth)已经成为促进医疗保健和行为改变的有效工具。然而,目前尚不清楚 mHealth 干预措施在促进美国人群避孕行为改变方面的效果如何。 **方法**:我们检索了 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 等数据库,以确定评估 mHealth 干预措施对避孕行为影响的研究。我们纳入了在美国进行的、以英语或西班牙语发表的、使用随机对照试验(RCT)、准随机对照试验(quasi-RCT)或前瞻性队列研究设计的研究。我们使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估了研究质量。 **结果**:我们共检索到 5529 篇文章,最终纳入了 13 项研究,其中 11 项为 RCT,2 项为前瞻性队列研究。这些研究共纳入了 3745 名参与者。大多数研究是为了评估 mHealth 应用程序,而不是其他类型的 mHealth 干预措施。研究的干预措施包括个性化信息、提醒、自我监测和行为反馈。大多数研究报告了积极的避孕行为结果,如增加了避孕方法的使用、减少了意外怀孕和提高了满意度。然而,研究的质量和报告的结果存在差异。 **结论**:mHealth 应用程序可能是一种有效的工具,可以促进美国人群避孕行为的改变。需要更多高质量的研究来评估不同类型的 mHealth 干预措施的效果。
J Health Commun. 2022 Feb 1;27(2):69-83. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2044413. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
The effect of a decision-support mHealth application on maternal and neonatal outcomes in two district hospitals in Rwanda: pre - post intervention study.决策支持型移动医疗应用对卢旺达两家地区医院母婴结局的影响:干预前后研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 20;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04393-9.
6
Insights into the design, development and implementation of a novel digital health tool for skilled birth attendants to support quality maternity care in Kenya.深入了解一款为熟练接生员设计、开发和实施的新型数字健康工具,以支持肯尼亚的优质孕产妇护理。
Fam Med Community Health. 2021 Aug;9(3). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000845.
7
Mobile Health Intervention in the Maternal Care Pathway: Protocol for the Impact Evaluation of hAPPyMamma.孕产妇护理路径中的移动健康干预:hAPPyMamma影响评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 19;10(1):e19073. doi: 10.2196/19073.
8
Improving the Quality of Antenatal Care Using Mobile Health in Madagascar: Five-Year Cross-Sectional Study.利用移动医疗提高马达加斯加的产前护理质量:一项为期五年的横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 8;8(7):e18543. doi: 10.2196/18543.
9
Is More Always Better?: Discovering Incentivized mHealth Intervention Engagement Related to Health Behavior Trends.越多越好吗?:探索与健康行为趋势相关的激励式移动健康干预参与度
Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2018 Dec;2(4). doi: 10.1145/3287031.
10
Digital health, gender and health equity: invisible imperatives.数字健康、性别与健康公平:不可忽视的必要条件。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Dec 1;40(suppl_2):ii1-ii5. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy171.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy.支持孕期女性戒烟的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 14;2(2):CD001055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub5.
2
Effectiveness of an SMS-based maternal mHealth intervention to improve clinical outcomes of HIV-positive pregnant women.基于短信的孕产妇移动健康干预措施对改善艾滋病毒阳性孕妇临床结局的有效性。
AIDS Care. 2017 Jul;29(7):890-897. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1280126. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
3
Assessing the Effect of mHealth Interventions in Improving Maternal and Neonatal Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.评估移动健康干预措施对改善低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇和新生儿护理的效果:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0154664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154664. eCollection 2016.
4
Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis.移动健康干预措施对低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇、新生儿及儿童健康的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(1):010401. doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.010401.
5
Evidence on feasibility and effective use of mHealth strategies by frontline health workers in developing countries: systematic review.发展中国家一线卫生工作者对移动健康策略的可行性及有效应用的证据:系统评价
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Aug;20(8):1003-14. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12525. Epub 2015 May 14.
6
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
7
mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework.移动医疗创新作为卫生系统强化工具:12 种常见应用和一个可视化框架。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013 Aug 6;1(2):160-71. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00031. eCollection 2013 Aug.
8
Antenatal health promotion via short message service at a Midwife Obstetrics Unit in South Africa: a mixed methods study.南非一家助产士产科单位通过短信服务进行产前健康促进:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Aug 21;14:284. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-284.
9
The effect of SMS messaging on the compliance with iron supplementation among pregnant women in Iran: a randomized controlled trial.短信对伊朗孕妇铁补充剂依从性的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Jun;20(4):201-206. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14533895. Epub 2014 May 6.
10
mHealth adoption in low-resource environments: a review of the use of mobile healthcare in developing countries.资源匮乏环境中的移动健康应用:发展中国家移动医疗应用情况综述
J Health Commun. 2015;20(1):4-34. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.864735. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

中低收入国家孕产妇健康移动医疗干预措施的靶向策略:一项系统评价方案

Targeting strategies of mHealth interventions for maternal health in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Ilozumba Onaedo, Abejirinde Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade, Dieleman Marjolein, Bardají Azucena, Broerse Jacqueline E W, Van Belle Sara

机构信息

Faculty of Sciences, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Public Health, Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde, Antwerpen, Belgium.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 24;8(2):e019345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019345.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019345
PMID:29478019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5855310/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Recently, there has been a steady increase in mobile health (mHealth) interventions aimed at improving maternal health of women in low-income and middle-income countries. While there is evidence indicating that these interventions contribute to improvements in maternal health outcomes, other studies indicate inconclusive results. This uncertainty has raised additional questions, one of which pertains to the role of targeting strategies in implementing mHealth interventions and the focus on pregnant women and health workers as target groups. This review aims to assess who is targeted in different mHealth interventions and the importance of targeting strategies in maternal mHealth interventions.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search for peer-reviewed, English-language literature published between 1999 and July 2017 in PubMed, Web of Knowledge (Science Direct, EMBASE) and Cochrane Central Registers of Controlled Trials. The study scope is defined by the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes framework: P, community members with maternal or reproductive needs; I, electronic health or mHealth programmes geared at improving maternal or reproductive health; C, other non-electronic health or mHealth-based interventions; O, maternal health measures including family planning, antenatal care attendance, health facility delivery and postnatal care attendance.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is a review of already published or publicly available data and needs no ethical approval. Review results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017072280.

摘要

引言

最近,旨在改善低收入和中等收入国家妇女孕产妇健康的移动健康(mHealth)干预措施稳步增加。虽然有证据表明这些干预措施有助于改善孕产妇健康结果,但其他研究结果却尚无定论。这种不确定性引发了更多问题,其中之一涉及目标策略在实施移动健康干预措施中的作用,以及将孕妇和卫生工作者作为目标群体的关注重点。本综述旨在评估不同移动健康干预措施的目标人群,以及目标策略在孕产妇移动健康干预措施中的重要性。

方法与分析

我们将在PubMed、知识网络(科学Direct、EMBASE)和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库中检索1999年至2017年7月发表的同行评审英文文献。研究范围由人群、干预措施、对照和结果框架定义:P,有孕产妇或生殖需求的社区成员;I,旨在改善孕产妇或生殖健康的电子健康或移动健康项目;C,其他非电子健康或基于移动健康的干预措施;O,孕产妇健康措施,包括计划生育、产前检查、医疗机构分娩和产后检查。

伦理与传播

本研究是对已发表或公开可用数据的综述,无需伦理批准。综述结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,并在国际会议上展示。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42017072280。