a Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education , University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , CA , USA.
b Department of Public Health , University of Otago , Wellington , New Zealand.
Glob Public Health. 2018 Dec;13(12):1753-1766. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1443485. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
This study examines how health advocates and the Australian government responded to international commercial pressure during the implementation of tobacco standardised packaging (SP) as a measure to reduce non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Relevant government and NGO documents, and media items were reviewed. Policymakers and health advocates (n = 19) in Australia were interviewed. In 2009, Australia's National Health Taskforce recommended SP, which the Australian government announced in April 2010. In response, tobacco companies threatened the government with litigation in both domestic and international courts, claiming that SP would violate their investment and intellectual property rights. However, these legal threats were unsuccessful in forcing the government to withdrawal the SP proposal. Tobacco companies legally challenged SP, but as of February 2018 failed with each legal challenge. The political success of enacting and implementing SP against international commercial pressure was supported by legal preparation and support, and a whole-of-government approach. The Australian SP case illustrates how, against international commercial opposition, governments can build and maintain political and official support to enact and implement progressive public health measures to reduce NCDs.
本研究考察了在实施烟草标准化包装(SP)作为减少非传染性疾病(NCD)措施的过程中,健康倡导者和澳大利亚政府如何应对国际商业压力。审查了相关的政府和非政府组织文件以及媒体报道。对澳大利亚的政策制定者和健康倡导者(n=19)进行了采访。2009 年,澳大利亚国家卫生工作队建议实施 SP,澳大利亚政府于 2010 年 4 月宣布。对此,烟草公司在国内外法院威胁政府提起诉讼,称 SP 将侵犯他们的投资和知识产权。然而,这些法律威胁并没有成功迫使政府撤回 SP 提案。烟草公司对 SP 提出了法律质疑,但截至 2018 年 2 月,每次法律质疑都以失败告终。在国际商业压力下颁布和实施 SP 的政治成功得到了法律准备和支持以及政府整体方法的支持。澳大利亚 SP 案例说明了在面临国际商业反对的情况下,政府如何建立和维持政治和官方支持,以颁布和实施减少非传染性疾病的渐进式公共卫生措施。