• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Advancing progressive health policy to reduce NCDs amidst international commercial opposition: Tobacco standardised packaging in Australia.推进有利于减少非传染性疾病的渐进式卫生政策,应对国际商业抵制:澳大利亚的烟草标准化包装。
Glob Public Health. 2018 Dec;13(12):1753-1766. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1443485. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
2
Regulatory chills: tobacco industry legal threats and the politics of tobacco standardised packaging in New Zealand.监管寒流:烟草行业的法律威胁与新西兰烟草标准化包装政策
N Z Med J. 2018 Apr 13;131(1473):25-41.
3
Tobacco industry argues domestic trademark laws and international treaties preclude cigarette health warning labels, despite consistent legal advice that the argument is invalid.烟草业声称国内商标法和国际条约禁止使用香烟健康警告标签,尽管有一致的法律意见认为该论点无效。
Tob Control. 2014 May;23(3):e7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050569. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
4
Normalizing Tobacco? The Politics of Trade, Investment, and Tobacco Control.使烟草正常化?贸易、投资和烟草控制的政治。
Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):449-479. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12393. Epub 2019 May 17.
5
A health professional's guide to the intersection of public health with intellectual property rights in trade and investment: the case of tobacco plain packaging.卫生专业人员指南:贸易和投资中的知识产权与公共卫生的交集:以烟草平装为例。
J Public Health Policy. 2020 Mar;41(1):52-62. doi: 10.1057/s41271-019-00195-0.
6
Containing diffusion: the tobacco industry's multipronged trade strategy to block tobacco standardised packaging.包含扩散策略:烟草业为阻止烟草标准化包装而采取的多管齐下的贸易策略。
Tob Control. 2019 Mar;28(2):195-205. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054227. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
7
Standardised tobacco packaging: a health policy case study of corporate conflict expansion and adaptation.标准化烟草包装:企业冲突扩展与适应的一项卫生政策案例研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 7;6(10):e012634. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012634.
8
Defending strong tobacco packaging and labelling regulations in Uruguay: transnational tobacco control network versus Philip Morris International.乌拉圭捍卫强有力的烟草包装和标签法规:跨国烟草控制网络与菲利普莫里斯国际公司的较量。
Tob Control. 2018 Mar;27(2):185-194. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053690. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
9
Presenting a strong and united front to tobacco industry interference : a content analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of tobacco plain packaging 2008-2014.向烟草业的干扰展示坚强统一的阵线:对澳大利亚报纸在 2008-2014 年间有关烟草平装的报道进行的内容分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 17;8(9):e023485. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023485.
10
Removing the last billboard for the tobacco industry: Tobacco standardized packaging in Ireland.拆除烟草行业的最后一块广告牌:爱尔兰的烟草标准化包装
Health Policy. 2019 Oct;123(10):932-935. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Public-Private Partnerships in Mexico: Implications of Engaging With the Food and Beverage Industry for Public Health Nutrition.墨西哥的公私合作伙伴关系:与食品饮料行业合作对公共卫生营养的影响。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8008. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8008. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
Adopting a WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control-Based Tobacco Control Law in Ethiopia: Sustained Transnational Health Advocacy and Multi-Sectoral Institutionalized Support.在埃塞俄比亚采用基于世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约的烟草控制法:持续的跨国卫生宣传和多部门制度化支持。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 28;21(3):280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030280.
3
Public health advocacy strategies to influence policy agendas: lessons from a narrative review of success in trade policy.公共卫生倡导策略对影响政策议程的作用:从贸易政策成功案例的叙述性综述中得到的经验教训。
Global Health. 2023 Aug 23;19(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00960-7.
4
Implementing front-of-pack nutrition warning labels in Mexico: important lessons for low- and middle-income countries.在墨西哥实施预包装食品营养标签:对中低收入国家的重要启示。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Oct;26(10):2149-2161. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001441. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
5
Advocacy counterstrategies to tobacco industry interference in policymaking: a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature.倡导应对烟草业干预决策制定的反策略:同行评议文献的范围综述。
Global Health. 2023 Jun 21;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00936-7.
6
Non-communicable disease policy implementation in Libya: A mixed methods assessment.利比亚非传染性疾病政策的实施:一项混合方法评估。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;2(11):e0000615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000615. eCollection 2022.
7
Framework Convention on Tobacco Control 2030-A Program to Accelerate the Implementation of World Health Organization Framework Convention for Tobacco Control in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.《2030 年烟草控制框架公约》:加速中低收入国家实施世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约的方案:一项混合方法评估。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 May 22;25(6):1074-1081. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad022.
8
Moving in the right direction: tobacco packaging and labeling in the Americas.朝着正确方向前进:美洲地区的烟草包装与标签
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 Dec 9;46:e196. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.196. eCollection 2022.
9
Overcoming tobacco industry opposition to standardized packaging in the Americas.克服烟草行业对美洲标准化包装的反对。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 May 10;46:e145. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.145. eCollection 2022.
10
Institutional tensions, corporate social responsibility and district-level governance of tobacco industry interference: analysing challenges in local implementation of Article 5.3 measures in Karnataka, India.体制紧张、企业社会责任与烟草业干扰的区级治理:分析印度卡纳塔克邦地方实施第 5.3 条措施面临的挑战
Tob Control. 2022 Jun;31(Suppl 1):s26-s32. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057113. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulatory chills: tobacco industry legal threats and the politics of tobacco standardised packaging in New Zealand.监管寒流:烟草行业的法律威胁与新西兰烟草标准化包装政策
N Z Med J. 2018 Apr 13;131(1473):25-41.
2
Tobacco control law implementation in a middle-income country: Transnational tobacco control network overcoming tobacco industry opposition in Colombia.在中等收入国家实施控烟法:跨国烟草控制网络如何克服哥伦比亚烟草业的反对。
Glob Public Health. 2018 Aug;13(8):1050-1064. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2017.1357188. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
3
Defending strong tobacco packaging and labelling regulations in Uruguay: transnational tobacco control network versus Philip Morris International.乌拉圭捍卫强有力的烟草包装和标签法规:跨国烟草控制网络与菲利普莫里斯国际公司的较量。
Tob Control. 2018 Mar;27(2):185-194. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053690. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
4
The health impact of trade and investment agreements: a quantitative systematic review and network co-citation analysis.贸易与投资协定对健康的影响:一项定量系统评价与网络共被引分析
Global Health. 2017 Mar 8;13(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0240-x.
5
Traffic-light labels could reduce population intakes of calories, total fat, saturated fat, and sodium.红绿灯标签可以减少人群的卡路里、总脂肪、饱和脂肪和钠的摄入量。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0171188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171188. eCollection 2017.
6
Nutrition labelling is a trade policy issue: lessons from an analysis of specific trade concerns at the World Trade Organization.营养标签是一个贸易政策问题:来自对世界贸易组织特定贸易关切分析的经验教训。
Health Promot Int. 2018 Aug 1;33(4):561-571. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw109.
7
Civil society: the catalyst for ensuring health in the age of sustainable development.公民社会:可持续发展时代保障健康的催化剂。
Global Health. 2016 Jul 16;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0178-4.
8
The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.强化香烟包装警示的影响:纵向观察性研究的系统评价
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:118-129. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
9
Costa Rica's implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: Overcoming decades of industry dominance.哥斯达黎加对《烟草控制框架公约》的实施:克服数十年的行业主导地位。
Salud Publica Mex. 2016 Jan-Feb;58(1):62-70. doi: 10.21149/spm.v58i1.7669.
10
The importance of continued engagement during the implementation phase of tobacco control policies in a middle-income country: the case of Costa Rica.在一个中等收入国家实施烟草控制政策的过程中持续参与的重要性:以哥斯达黎加为例。
Tob Control. 2017 Jan;26(1):60-68. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052701. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

推进有利于减少非传染性疾病的渐进式卫生政策,应对国际商业抵制:澳大利亚的烟草标准化包装。

Advancing progressive health policy to reduce NCDs amidst international commercial opposition: Tobacco standardised packaging in Australia.

机构信息

a Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education , University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , CA , USA.

b Department of Public Health , University of Otago , Wellington , New Zealand.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2018 Dec;13(12):1753-1766. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1443485. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1080/17441692.2018.1443485
PMID:29484965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6110984/
Abstract

This study examines how health advocates and the Australian government responded to international commercial pressure during the implementation of tobacco standardised packaging (SP) as a measure to reduce non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Relevant government and NGO documents, and media items were reviewed. Policymakers and health advocates (n = 19) in Australia were interviewed. In 2009, Australia's National Health Taskforce recommended SP, which the Australian government announced in April 2010. In response, tobacco companies threatened the government with litigation in both domestic and international courts, claiming that SP would violate their investment and intellectual property rights. However, these legal threats were unsuccessful in forcing the government to withdrawal the SP proposal. Tobacco companies legally challenged SP, but as of February 2018 failed with each legal challenge. The political success of enacting and implementing SP against international commercial pressure was supported by legal preparation and support, and a whole-of-government approach. The Australian SP case illustrates how, against international commercial opposition, governments can build and maintain political and official support to enact and implement progressive public health measures to reduce NCDs.

摘要

本研究考察了在实施烟草标准化包装(SP)作为减少非传染性疾病(NCD)措施的过程中,健康倡导者和澳大利亚政府如何应对国际商业压力。审查了相关的政府和非政府组织文件以及媒体报道。对澳大利亚的政策制定者和健康倡导者(n=19)进行了采访。2009 年,澳大利亚国家卫生工作队建议实施 SP,澳大利亚政府于 2010 年 4 月宣布。对此,烟草公司在国内外法院威胁政府提起诉讼,称 SP 将侵犯他们的投资和知识产权。然而,这些法律威胁并没有成功迫使政府撤回 SP 提案。烟草公司对 SP 提出了法律质疑,但截至 2018 年 2 月,每次法律质疑都以失败告终。在国际商业压力下颁布和实施 SP 的政治成功得到了法律准备和支持以及政府整体方法的支持。澳大利亚 SP 案例说明了在面临国际商业反对的情况下,政府如何建立和维持政治和官方支持,以颁布和实施减少非传染性疾病的渐进式公共卫生措施。