Suppr超能文献

两种套管方法在评估大鼠模型海绵体内压中的比较。

Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model.

机构信息

Department of Urology & Andrology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanhua University. Hengyang, Hunan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 27;13(2):e0193543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193543. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Intracavernous pressure (ICP) measurement is a well-established technique for assessing the erectile function, which was performed by cannulating either crus or shaft of the penis. However, there are no studies concerning the experimental performance of the two cannulation sites yet. The aim of this study was to compare the measuring outcomes using two different cannulation sites. To validate the capacity of our study, both normal and the castration-induced erectile dysfunction rat models were conducted. Fifty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized equally into two groups: an intact group and a castration group. Five rats from each group firstly underwent different stimulation parameters to detect the optimal erectile responses. The residual rats in each group were further assigned into two subgroups (n = 10 per subgroup) according to two different cannulation sites (crus or shaft of the corpus cavernosum). The ICP values were compared between groups after different interventions. The optimal parameters for mean maximum ICP were recorded at 2.5V and a frequency of 15 Hz. The rats under the two different cannulation sites tended to show similar ICP values in both the intact and the castration groups. However, the success rate in monitoring ICP was significantly higher in the groups cannulating into the shaft of the penis compared to the crus (100% vs. 70%; P = 0.02). Our data suggested that the method of cannulation into the penile shaft could serve as a better alternative for the ICP measurement in rats.

摘要

海绵体内压(ICP)测量是评估勃起功能的一种成熟技术,可通过阴茎的海绵体或阴茎干进行插管。然而,目前尚无关于这两个插管部位的实验性能的研究。本研究旨在比较两种不同插管部位的测量结果。为了验证我们研究的能力,我们进行了正常和去势诱导的勃起功能障碍大鼠模型。将 50 只成年雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠随机平均分为两组:完整组和去势组。每组中的 5 只大鼠首先接受不同的刺激参数,以检测最佳勃起反应。每组中剩余的大鼠根据两种不同的插管部位(海绵体阴茎干或阴茎海绵体海绵体)进一步分为两个亚组(每组 10 只)。比较不同干预后组间的 ICP 值。记录到平均最大 ICP 的最佳参数为 2.5V 和 15Hz 的频率。在完整组和去势组中,两种不同插管部位的大鼠倾向于表现出相似的 ICP 值。然而,与海绵体阴茎干插管相比,阴茎干插管监测 ICP 的成功率显著更高(100%比 70%;P=0.02)。我们的数据表明,阴茎干插管方法可作为大鼠 ICP 测量的更好选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10e1/5828359/bad73b78664c/pone.0193543.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验