• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷在慢性颈痛患者中的验证

Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain.

作者信息

Langenfeld Anke, Bastiaenen Carolien, Brunner Florian, Swanenburg Jaap

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Spinal Research ISR, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.

CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2018 Mar 2;11(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3269-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-018-3269-x
PMID:29499753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5833147/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To validate the German version of OMPSQ (OMPSQ-G) for patients with chronic neck pain.

RESULTS

After translating OMPSQ to German, we assessed the discriminant validity between patients and healthy adults. Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients between domains of OMPSQ-G and the German version of neck disability index (NDI-G) and visual analogue scale (VAS) of neck pain intensity. Floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, test-retest and relative reliability were assessed. Fifty patients with chronic neck pain (mean age, 43.6 years; 34 females) and 24 healthy adults (mean age, 50.4 years; 18 females) participated. Mann-Whitney U tests showed significant differences in OMPSQ scores between both groups at the baseline (z = - 4.6; p < 0.001) and second time point (z = - 4.8; p < 0.001). OMPSQ-G scores highly and moderately correlated with NDI-G (ρ = 0.70) and VAS (ρ = 0.41) scores, respectively. There were no floor or ceiling effects. Cronbach's alpha was 0.94. OMPSQ-G showed high reliability (intraclass correlation 2.1: 0.93; standard error of measurement, 6.9; smallest detectable change, 20 points). The Bland-Altman plot indicated no systematic error. OMPSQ-G showed good validity and reliability in patients with neck pain. Trial registration NCT02540343.

摘要

目的

验证慢性颈痛患者的德语版OMPSQ(OMPSQ-G)。

结果

将OMPSQ翻译成德语后,我们评估了患者与健康成年人之间的区分效度。使用OMPSQ-G各领域与德语版颈部功能障碍指数(NDI-G)以及颈部疼痛强度视觉模拟量表(VAS)之间的Pearson相关系数评估收敛效度。评估了地板效应和天花板效应、内部一致性、重测信度和相对信度。50例慢性颈痛患者(平均年龄43.6岁;34例女性)和24例健康成年人(平均年龄50.4岁;18例女性)参与研究。Mann-Whitney U检验显示,两组在基线时(z = -4.6;p < 0.001)和第二个时间点(z = -4.8;p < 0.001)的OMPSQ评分存在显著差异。OMPSQ-G评分分别与NDI-G(ρ = 0.70)和VAS(ρ = 0.41)评分高度和中度相关。不存在地板效应或天花板效应。Cronbach's α为0.94。OMPSQ-G显示出高信度(组内相关系数2.1:0.93;测量标准误,6.9;最小可检测变化,20分)。Bland-Altman图显示无系统误差。OMPSQ-G在颈痛患者中显示出良好的效度和信度。试验注册号NCT02540343。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain.厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷在慢性颈痛患者中的验证
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Mar 2;11(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3269-x.
2
Development, validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Copenhagen neck functional disability scale.哥本哈根颈部功能障碍量表意大利语版的开发、效度与信度
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Nov 23;19(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2332-z.
3
Validity and reliability of a German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G).德文版颈部功能障碍指数(NDI-G)的效度和信度。
Man Ther. 2014 Feb;19(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
4
Construct validity and reliability of Finnish version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.奥雷布洛肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷芬兰语版的结构效度和信度
Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Hausa version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in patients with non-specific low back pain.跨文化调适与奥勒布罗肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷豪萨语版在非特异性下腰痛患者中的心理计量学验证。
Scand J Pain. 2020 Sep 7;21(1):103-111. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0071. Print 2021 Jan 27.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire-Short Form for Chronic Low Back Pain.《Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷简表-慢性下背痛日本版的有效性和可靠性》。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jul;25(4):E681-E688.
7
Örebro Questionnaire: short and long forms of the Brazilian-Portuguese version.厄勒布鲁问卷:巴西葡萄牙语版本的简短和长版本。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Nov;24(11):2777-88. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0998-3. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
8
Test-retest reliability of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire and the Situational Pain Scale in patients with chronic low back pain.慢性下背痛患者 Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷和情境疼痛量表的重测信度。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2013 Dec 6;143:w13903. doi: 10.4414/smw.2013.13903. eCollection 2013.
9
The Persian Version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire: Translation and Evaluation of its Psychometric Properties.厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷的波斯语版本:其心理测量特性的翻译与评估
Int J Prev Med. 2017 Mar 7;8:14. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.201658. eCollection 2017.
10
Reliability, Construct and Predictive Validity of the Hong Kong Chinese Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.香港中文 Orebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷的信度、结构和预测效度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Dec;27(4):584-592. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9689-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypervigilance to Pain May Predict the Transition from Subacute to Chronic Back Pain: A Longitudinal Observational Study.对疼痛的过度警觉可能预示着从亚急性背痛向慢性背痛的转变:一项纵向观察研究。
J Pain Res. 2025 Jun 25;18:3141-3158. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S512911. eCollection 2025.
2
A multisite validation of brain white matter pathways of resilience to chronic back pain.慢性背痛恢复力的脑白质通路的多中心验证。
Elife. 2024 Dec 24;13:RP96312. doi: 10.7554/eLife.96312.
3
Corticostriatal circuits in the transition to chronic back pain: The predictive role of reward learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷波斯语版本的跨文化适应、效度和信度
Asian Spine J. 2017 Aug;11(4):520-530. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.4.520. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
2
Dutch version of the Fear of Pain Questionnaire for adolescents with chronic pain.适用于慢性疼痛青少年的荷兰语版疼痛恐惧问卷。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jun;40(11):1326-1332. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1289255. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
3
Reliability, Construct and Predictive Validity of the Hong Kong Chinese Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.
皮质纹状体回路在慢性背痛中的转变:奖励学习的预测作用。
Cell Rep Med. 2022 Jul 19;3(7):100677. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100677. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
4
Development and external validation of a prediction model for patient-relevant outcomes in patients with chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia.开发并外部验证了一个用于慢性广泛性疼痛和纤维肌痛患者相关结局预测的模型。
Eur J Pain. 2022 May;26(5):1123-1134. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1937. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
5
Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol.哪种运动治疗腰痛?(WELBack)试验预测腰痛患者运动治疗反应:一项验证性随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e042792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042792.
香港中文 Orebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷的信度、结构和预测效度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Dec;27(4):584-592. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9689-3.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire among Turkish workers with low back pain.Örebro肌肉骨骼疼痛问卷在土耳其腰痛工人中的跨文化适应性研究。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016;29(1):135-43. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150609.
5
Construct and predictive validity of the German Örebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain.用于腰痛患者心理社会风险因素筛查的德国厄勒布鲁问卷简表的结构效度和预测效度。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):325-332. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4196-3. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
6
Örebro Questionnaire: short and long forms of the Brazilian-Portuguese version.厄勒布鲁问卷:巴西葡萄牙语版本的简短和长版本。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Nov;24(11):2777-88. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0998-3. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
7
Spanish version of the screening Örebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation.Örebro肌肉骨骼疼痛问卷筛查的西班牙语版本:跨文化调适与验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 29;12:157. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0157-5.
8
Function and activity in patients with knee arthroplasty: validity and reliability of a German version of the Lysholm Score and the Tegner Activity Scale.膝关节置换术患者的功能与活动:德文版Lysholm评分和Tegner活动量表的有效性和可靠性
Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Jun 12;144:w13976. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.13976. eCollection 2014.
9
The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study.全球颈部疼痛负担:来自 2010 年全球疾病负担研究的估计。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1309-15. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
10
Validity and reliability of a German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G).德文版颈部功能障碍指数(NDI-G)的效度和信度。
Man Ther. 2014 Feb;19(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 3.