Camargos Paulo, Affonso Alessandra, Calazans Geralda, Ramalho Lidiana, Ribeiro Marisa L, Jentzsch Nulma, Senna Simone, Stein Renato T
1Pediatric Pulmonology Unit, University Hospital, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Avenida Alfredo Balena 190, Room 267, Belo Horizonte, 30130-100 Brazil.
Municipal Public Health Department, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Clin Transl Allergy. 2018 Mar 5;8:7. doi: 10.1186/s13601-018-0192-0. eCollection 2018.
Daily inhaled corticosteroids are widely recommended for mild persistent asthma. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the intermittent use of beclomethasone as an alternative treatment for mild persistent asthma.
In this 16-week trial, children aged 6-18 years were evaluated. Subjects in the continuous treatment arm of the study received 500 μg/day of beclomethasone, whereas the intermittent ones were given 1000 μg/day (250 μg every 6 h) in combination with albuterol for 7 days upon exacerbations or worsening of symptoms. Primary outcome (i.e., treatment failure) was the occurrence of any asthma exacerbation requiring prednisone, and co-secondary outcomes were the mean/median differences for both, (1) the pre-bronchodilator FEV (% predicted) and (2) asthma control test (ACT/cACT) scores, from randomization to the last follow-up visit, and beclomethasone and albuterol consumption.
Ninety-four subjects from each treatment arm were included. They were comparable regarding all baseline characteristics; prednisone was used by 10 (10.6%) and 7 (7.4%) patients, respectively (95% CI - 6.1 to 12.6%, for the difference; p = 0.47). Statistical analysis showed no statistically significant differences with respect to both FEV (p = 0.39) and ACT/cACT scores (p = 0.38). As assessed through canister weighting, children used from 0.5 to 0.7 and from 1.6 to 1.8 puffs per day of beclomethasone in the intermittent and continuous regimens, respectively. Regarding albuterol, received 0.3-0.4 (intermittent) and 0.1-0.2 (continuous) inhalations per day. There were no relevant clinical or functional differences between the two treatment regimens.
Clinicians might consider intermittent inhaled steroid therapy as a therapeutic regimen for mild persistent asthma. The Portuguese and English versions of the study protocol were submitted, approved, and registered in the Brazilian Network Platform for Clinical Trials (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br) under the primary identifier number "RBR-3gbyhk". This platform is part of the Primary Registries in the World Health Organization Registry Network, where the trial is registered under the following Universal Trial Number: 1111-1149-4774.
每日吸入糖皮质激素被广泛推荐用于轻度持续性哮喘。本研究旨在评估间歇性使用倍氯米松作为轻度持续性哮喘替代治疗的疗效。
在这项为期16周的试验中,对6至18岁的儿童进行了评估。研究中持续治疗组的受试者接受每日500μg的倍氯米松,而间歇性治疗组在症状加重或恶化时,每日给予1000μg(每6小时250μg)并联合使用沙丁胺醇,持续7天。主要结局(即治疗失败)是发生任何需要使用泼尼松的哮喘加重情况,共同次要结局是从随机分组到最后一次随访期间,(1)支气管扩张剂使用前第一秒用力呼气量(FEV,%预计值)和(2)哮喘控制测试(ACT/cACT)评分的均值/中位数差异,以及倍氯米松和沙丁胺醇的使用量。
每个治疗组纳入了94名受试者。他们在所有基线特征方面具有可比性;分别有10名(10.6%)和7名(7.4%)患者使用了泼尼松(差异的95%置信区间为 - 6.1%至12.6%;p = 0.47)。统计分析显示,在FEV(p = 0.39)和ACT/cACT评分(p = 0.38)方面均无统计学显著差异。通过药罐称重评估,间歇性和持续性治疗方案中儿童每日分别使用0.5至0.7喷和1.6至1.8喷的倍氯米松。关于沙丁胺醇,每日吸入量分别为0.3 - 0.4喷(间歇性)和0.1 - 0.2喷(持续性)。两种治疗方案之间没有相关的临床或功能差异。
临床医生可考虑将间歇性吸入糖皮质激素疗法作为轻度持续性哮喘的一种治疗方案。该研究方案的葡萄牙语和英语版本已提交、获批并在巴西临床试验网络平台(http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br)注册,主要标识符编号为“RBR - 3gbyhk”。该平台是世界卫生组织注册网络中主要注册机构的一部分,该试验在以下通用试验编号下注册:1111 - 1149 - 4774。