Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Room Hs-220, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Research and Development Department, Pie Medical Imaging, BV, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Oct;31(5):670-679. doi: 10.1007/s10278-018-0061-3.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a semi-automatic right ventricle segmentation method on short-axis cardiac cine MR images which segment all right ventricle contours in a cardiac phase using one seed contour. Twenty-eight consecutive short-axis, four-chamber, and tricuspid valve view cardiac cine MRI examinations of healthy volunteers were used. Two independent observers performed the manual and automatic segmentations of the right ventricles. Analyses were based on the ventricular volume and ejection fraction of the right heart chamber. Reproducibility of the manual and semi-automatic segmentations was assessed using intra- and inter-observer variability. Validity of the semi-automatic segmentations was analyzed with reference to the manual segmentations. The inter- and intra-observer variability of manual segmentations were between 0.8 and 3.2%. The semi-automatic segmentations were highly correlated with the manual segmentations (R 0.79-0.98), with median difference of 0.9-4.8% and of 3.3% for volume and ejection fraction parameters, respectively. In comparison to the manual segmentation, the semi-automatic segmentation produced contours with median dice metrics of 0.95 and 0.87 and median Hausdorff distance of 5.05 and 7.35 mm for contours at end-diastolic and end-systolic phases, respectively. The inter- and intra-observer variability of the semi-automatic segmentations were lower than observed in the manual segmentations. Both manual and semi-automatic segmentations performed better at the end-diastolic phase than at the end-systolic phase. The investigated semi-automatic segmentation method managed to produce a valid and reproducible alternative to manual right ventricle segmentation.
本研究旨在评估一种半自动右心室分割方法,该方法使用一个种子轮廓在一个心动周期内分割所有右心室轮廓。使用了 28 例连续的短轴、四腔和三尖瓣视图心脏电影磁共振成像检查的健康志愿者。两名独立观察者分别进行手动和自动的右心室分割。分析基于右心腔的心室容积和射血分数。采用观察者内和观察者间的变异性评估手动和半自动分割的可重复性。通过与手动分割的比较来分析半自动分割的有效性。手动分割的观察者内和观察者间变异性在 0.8 到 3.2%之间。半自动分割与手动分割高度相关(R 值为 0.79-0.98),体积和射血分数参数的中位数差异分别为 0.9-4.8%和 3.3%。与手动分割相比,半自动分割产生的轮廓的迪奇度量中位数分别为 0.95 和 0.87,舒张末期和收缩末期的轮廓的豪斯多夫距离中位数分别为 5.05 和 7.35 毫米。半自动分割的观察者内和观察者间变异性低于手动分割。手动和半自动分割在舒张末期的性能均优于收缩末期。研究中调查的半自动分割方法成功地为手动右心室分割提供了一种有效且可重复的替代方法。