• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人的减重手术与相似的手术风险相关,并具有显著的长期健康益处。

Bariatric Surgery in the Elderly Is Associated with Similar Surgical Risks and Significant Long-Term Health Benefits.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery B, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.

Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2018 Aug;28(8):2165-2170. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3160-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-018-3160-9
PMID:29525937
Abstract

PURPOSE

Older age (> 60) has been considered a relative contraindication for bariatric surgery due to increased complication risk. This study examined the risks and benefits of bariatric surgery for patients older than 60 years in Canadian population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of the Ontario Bariatric Registry: a database recording peri-operative and post-operative outcomes of publicly funded bariatric surgeries across the province. Patients who completed 1 year follow-up, who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) between January 2010 and May 2013, were divided into older (> 60) and younger (> 60) cohorts, and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Between January 2010 and May 2013, 3166 registry patients underwent LRYGB or LSG and completed 1-year follow-up. Of these, 204 (6.5%) were older than 60 years, with 175 (85.8%) undergoing LRYGB and 29 (14.2%) LSG. Demographics were similar, except for a higher number of males in the older group (59 (28.9%) versus 452 (15.3%) (p < 0.001)). No significant difference in complication rate was noted (15% for younger cohort versus 13.8% (p = 0.889)). The average percentage of excess weight loss was significantly higher in the younger population (60.72% versus 56.25% (p < 0.05)) overall, however not significantly in the LSG group. Reduction in medication use post-surgery for management of co-morbidities was significantly higher in the older patients (- 0.91 versus - 2.03 (p < 0.001)).

CONCLUSION

The older cohort who underwent LRYGB or LSG was at no greater risk for intra-operative and post-operative complications and showed greater reduction in medication use post-surgery when compared to the younger cohort.

摘要

目的

由于并发症风险增加,年龄较大(>60 岁)被认为是减重手术的相对禁忌症。本研究检查了加拿大人群中年龄>60 岁的患者接受减重手术的风险和益处。

方法

这是一项对安大略省减重登记处的回顾性队列研究:该数据库记录了全省公共资助减重手术的围手术期和术后结果。完成 1 年随访、2010 年 1 月至 2013 年 5 月期间接受腹腔镜胃旁路术(LRYGB)或腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)的患者被分为年龄较大(>60 岁)和年龄较小(>60 岁)两组,并比较了结果。

结果

2010 年 1 月至 2013 年 5 月期间,3166 名登记患者接受了 LRYGB 或 LSG 手术并完成了 1 年随访。其中,204 名(6.5%)年龄>60 岁,其中 175 名(85.8%)接受了 LRYGB 手术,29 名(14.2%)接受了 LSG 手术。除了年龄较大的组中男性人数较多(59 名(28.9%)比 452 名(15.3%)(p<0.001))外,两组患者的人口统计学特征相似。并发症发生率无显著差异(年轻组为 15%,老年组为 13.8%(p=0.889))。总体而言,年轻人群的超重减轻百分比明显更高(60.72%比 56.25%(p<0.05)),但 LSG 组则不明显。与年轻组相比,老年患者术后用于治疗合并症的药物使用减少更为显著(-0.91 比-2.03(p<0.001))。

结论

与年轻组相比,接受 LRYGB 或 LSG 的老年组在手术中和手术后并发症方面的风险没有增加,并且术后药物使用减少更为显著。

相似文献

1
Bariatric Surgery in the Elderly Is Associated with Similar Surgical Risks and Significant Long-Term Health Benefits.老年人的减重手术与相似的手术风险相关,并具有显著的长期健康益处。
Obes Surg. 2018 Aug;28(8):2165-2170. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3160-9.
2
Comparison of Outcomes Between Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Lebanese Bariatric Surgical Practice.黎巴嫩减重手术实践中腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的疗效比较。
Obes Surg. 2018 Feb;28(2):396-404. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2849-5.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity.肥胖症患者行减重手术的成本效果分析。
Obes Surg. 2018 Aug;28(8):2203-2214. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3100-0.
4
Influence of Patient Choice on Outcome of Bariatric Surgery.患者选择对减肥手术结果的影响。
Obes Surg. 2018 Feb;28(2):483-488. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2871-7.
5
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients Older than 60.60岁以上患者行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的疗效
Obes Surg. 2015 Dec;25(12):2251-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1712-9.
6
Two-step conversion surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Comparison between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic gastric sleeve.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败后的两步转换手术。腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与腹腔镜胃袖状切除术的比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1085-91. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
7
A Retrospective 2-Year Follow-up of Late Complications Treated Surgically and Endoscopically After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) for Morbid Obesity.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)和腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)治疗病态肥胖后手术和内镜治疗晚期并发症的2年回顾性随访
Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):1055-1062. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2967-0.
8
Gastric band conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass shows greater weight loss than conversion to sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes.胃束带转换为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术比转换为袖状胃切除术能获得更大的减重效果:5 年随访结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1531-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
9
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Bariatric Surgery Readmissions: Findings From 130,007 Admissions in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program.减重手术再入院的患病率及危险因素:来自代谢与减重手术认证及质量改进项目130,007例入院病例的研究结果
Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):122-131. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002079.
10
Medium to long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery in older adults with super obesity.超级肥胖老年人行减重手术后的中远期疗效。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Apr;14(4):470-476. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Frailty Index as a Predictor of Operative Safety and Efficacy in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.衰弱指数作为腹腔镜袖状胃切除术患者手术安全性和疗效的预测指标
Obes Surg. 2025 May;35(5):1603-1610. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07713-y. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
2
Demographic Factors Associated with Postoperative Complications in Primary Bariatric Surgery: A Rapid Review.原发性减重手术术后并发症相关的人口统计学因素:快速综述
Obes Surg. 2025 Apr;35(4):1456-1468. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07784-x. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
3
A Population-Based Study of Bariatric Surgery Trends in Australia: Variations Reflect Continuing Inequities in Access to Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
BARIATRIC SURGERY IN THE ELDERLY: RESULTS OF A MEAN FOLLOW-UP OF FIVE YEARS.老年患者的减重手术:五年平均随访结果
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):15-8. doi: 10.1590/S0102-6720201500S100006.
2
Bariatric surgery in elderly patients: a systematic review.老年患者的减重手术:一项系统综述
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Oct 13;10:1627-35. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S70313. eCollection 2015.
3
Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the United States, 2003-2012.2003 - 2012年美国代谢综合征的患病率。
一项基于人群的澳大利亚减肥手术趋势研究:差异反映出手术可及性方面持续存在的不平等现象。
Obes Surg. 2025 Mar;35(3):1026-1035. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07699-7. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
4
Effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on weight loss and metabolic improvement in subjects aged 65 years or older: a subanalysis of J-SMART study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术对65岁及以上受试者体重减轻和代谢改善的影响:J-SMART研究的亚组分析
Diabetol Int. 2024 Oct 13;16(1):56-64. doi: 10.1007/s13340-024-00767-w. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Early outcomes of one-anastomosis gastric bypass in the elderly population at high-volume bariatric centers.大容量减重中心老年患者行单吻合口胃旁路术的早期结果。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jan;76(1):187-191. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01697-z. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
6
Summarizing Consensus Guidelines on Obesity Management: A Joint, Multidisciplinary Venture of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity & Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) and World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO).肥胖管理共识指南总结:国际肥胖与代谢疾病外科联盟(IFSO)和世界胃肠病学组织(WGO)的联合多学科项目。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023;57(10):967-976. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001916. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
7
Robotic Bariatric Surgery in Older Adults, Is It Safer Than the Laparoscopic Approach? A 7-Year Analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database.机器人减重手术在老年人中的应用:与腹腔镜方法相比更安全吗?对代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)数据库的 7 年分析。
Obes Surg. 2023 Sep;33(9):2671-2678. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06720-1. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
8
What patient factors influence bariatric surgery outcomes? A multiple regression analysis of Ontario Bariatric Registry data.哪些患者因素会影响减重手术的效果?安大略减重手术注册中心数据的多元回归分析。
Can J Surg. 2022 Feb 3;65(1):E66-E72. doi: 10.1503/cjs.018319. Print 2022 Jan-Feb.
9
Environmental Health Risk Evaluation Model for Coastal Chemical Industry.沿海化工产业环境健康风险评价模型
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Nov 10;2021:6896929. doi: 10.1155/2021/6896929. eCollection 2021.
10
Development of the "OS-SEV90 Score" to Predict Severe Postoperative Complications at 90 Days Following Bariatric Surgery.肥胖症手术 90 天后严重术后并发症的“OS-SEV90 评分”的制定。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jul;31(7):3053-3064. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05367-0. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
JAMA. 2015 May 19;313(19):1973-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4260.
4
Bariatric surgery in the elderly: 2009-2013.老年人的减肥手术:2009 - 2013年
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Mar-Apr;11(2):393-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
5
Benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in patients aged more than 60 years.60岁以上患者接受减肥手术的益处与风险。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Jan 9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.12.012.
6
Early results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS): a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.瑞士多中心旁路或袖套研究(SM-BOSS)的早期结果:一项比较腹腔镜袖状胃切除术和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2013 Nov;258(5):690-4; discussion 695. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a67426.
7
Correlation between age and weight loss after bariatric surgery.肥胖症手术治疗后体重减轻与年龄的相关性。
Obes Surg. 2013 Aug;23(8):1286-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-0905-3.
8
Age as a long-term prognostic factor in bariatric surgery.年龄作为肥胖症手术的长期预后因素。
Ann Surg. 2012 Nov;256(5):724-8; discussion 728-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182734113.
9
Bariatric surgery is effective and safe in patients over 55: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肥胖症手术在 55 岁以上患者中安全有效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2012 Sep;22(9):1507-16. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0693-1.
10
Outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients >70 years old.70 岁以上患者的减重手术结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):458-62. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Apr 14.