1Department of Pediatrics,University of Maryland School of Medicine,737 West Lombard Street,Room 163,Baltimore,MD 21201,USA.
2Department of Family Medicine,University of Wisconsin Eau Claire,Madison,WI,USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jul;21(10):1855-1864. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000186. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
To identify home environment factors associated with toddler dietary behaviours using ecological momentary assessment (EMA).
Home environment and toddler's diet were assessed by mothers through EMA (random beeps over ≤8 d and a brief survey). Dietary outcomes were fruit/vegetable consumption, eating episode ('snack' v. 'meal') and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption. Home environment factors included interacting with mother, eating alone/with others, eating in a high chair/chair at the table, watching television and movement/translocation. Multilevel logistic mixed-effects regression models assessed both within- (individual toddlers across time) and between- (toddlers-on-average) subject effects.
Low-income mother-toddler dyads (n 277).
Urban and suburban Maryland, USA.
EMA captured eating/drinking episodes for 249/277 (89·9 %) toddlers (883 eating episodes, 1586 drinking episodes). Toddlers-on-average were more likely (adjusted OR, P value) to eat fruit/vegetables when not moving around (0·43, P=0·043), eat with the television off (0·33, P<0·001) and eat in a high chair/chair (3·38, P<0·001); no within-subject effects were shown. For eating episodes, both toddlers-on-average and individual toddlers were more likely to eat snacks when not in a high chair/chair (0·13, P<0·001 and 0·06, P<0·001, respectively) and when eating alone (0·30, P<0·001 and 0·31, P<0·001, respectively). Also, individual toddlers were more likely to eat snacks when moving around (3·61, P<0·001). Toddlers-on-average were more likely to consume SSB when not in a high chair/chair (0·21, P=0·001), eating alone (0·38, P=0·047) or during a snacking episode (v. a meal: 3·96, P=0·012); no within-subject effects shown.
Factors in the home environment are associated with dietary behaviours among toddlers. Understanding the interplay between the home environment and toddler diet can inform future paediatric dietary recommendations.
使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)确定与幼儿饮食行为相关的家庭环境因素。
通过 EMA(≤8 天的随机哔哔声和简短调查),母亲评估家庭环境和幼儿的饮食。饮食结果包括水果/蔬菜的摄入量、进食事件(“零食”与“餐”)和含糖饮料(SSB)的摄入量。家庭环境因素包括与母亲互动、独自进食/与他人一起进食、在高脚椅/餐椅上进食、看电视和活动/转移。多水平逻辑混合效应回归模型评估了个体幼儿随时间的个体内(within-subject)和幼儿之间(between-subject)的影响。
来自马里兰州城市和郊区的低收入母亲-幼儿对子(n=277)。
美国。
EMA 记录了 249/277(89.9%)幼儿的进食/饮水事件(883 次进食事件,1586 次饮水事件)。从平均值来看,当幼儿不四处走动时(调整后的 OR,P 值),幼儿更有可能进食水果/蔬菜(0.43,P=0.043)、在关闭电视时进食(0.33,P<0.001)和在高脚椅/餐椅上进食(3.38,P<0.001);未显示个体内影响。对于进食事件,从平均值和个体幼儿来看,当幼儿不在高脚椅/餐椅上时,他们更有可能吃零食(0.13,P<0.001 和 0.06,P<0.001,分别)和独自进食(0.30,P<0.001 和 0.31,P<0.001,分别)。此外,个体幼儿在四处走动时更有可能吃零食(3.61,P<0.001)。从平均值来看,幼儿更有可能在不在高脚椅/餐椅上(0.21,P=0.001)、独自进食(0.38,P=0.047)或在吃零食时(与正餐相比:3.96,P=0.012)饮用 SSB;未显示个体内影响。
家庭环境中的因素与幼儿的饮食行为有关。了解家庭环境和幼儿饮食之间的相互作用可以为未来的儿科饮食建议提供信息。