a Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine , The University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia.
b Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care , KU Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.
Psychol Health Med. 2018 Sep;23(8):899-916. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1446096. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
Loneliness is an emerging and important public health concern associated with increased risk for health disorders and even mortality. Interventions targeting coping strategies might be effective in alleviating feelings of loneliness. However, the relationship between loneliness and coping strategies is not well understood. We systematically reviewed quantitative studies addressing the association between loneliness and coping. Studies were included if loneliness and coping styles were measured with a validated scale and the association between both was assessed quantitatively. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases in compliance with the predefined in- and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers performed the search, quality appraisal, and data extraction. Coping styles were subdivided according to problem-focused and emotion-focused coping strategies. We included twelve studies that measured the association between loneliness and coping. Half of the studies had low risk of bias (n = 6), in the remaining six the risk of bias was moderate (n = 1) or high (n = 5). All studies that showed a significant association between loneliness and coping consistently showed that problem-focused coping styles were associated with lower levels of loneliness, and emotion-focused coping styles with higher levels of loneliness. Our findings suggest that learning how to use problem-focused coping strategies could be an important aspect of interventions targeting loneliness. This should be further explored in randomized clinical trials. Trials should report changes is coping and changes in loneliness and also include multivariate models that investigate if changes in coping contributed to changes in loneliness. Furthermore, further research should explore the role of different subgroups (e.g. older people), and the role of different types of loneliness as these can affect the effectiveness of loneliness interventions.
孤独感是一个新兴的重要公共卫生问题,与健康障碍甚至死亡率的增加有关。针对应对策略的干预措施可能有助于缓解孤独感。然而,孤独感和应对策略之间的关系还没有得到很好的理解。我们系统地回顾了定量研究,这些研究探讨了孤独感和应对策略之间的关系。如果孤独感和应对方式是用经过验证的量表测量的,并且两者之间的关系是定量评估的,那么研究就可以被纳入。我们按照预先设定的纳入和排除标准,在 Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane Library 和 CINAHL 数据库中进行了搜索。两名独立的审查员进行了搜索、质量评估和数据提取。应对方式根据问题聚焦型和情绪聚焦型应对策略进行了细分。我们纳入了 12 项研究,这些研究测量了孤独感和应对之间的关系。其中一半的研究具有低偏倚风险(n=6),其余 6 项研究的偏倚风险为中度(n=1)或高度(n=5)。所有显示孤独感和应对之间存在显著关联的研究都一致表明,问题聚焦型应对方式与较低水平的孤独感相关,而情绪聚焦型应对方式与较高水平的孤独感相关。我们的研究结果表明,学习如何使用问题聚焦型应对策略可能是针对孤独感的干预措施的一个重要方面。这应该在随机临床试验中进一步探讨。试验应报告应对方式的变化和孤独感的变化,还应包括多元模型,以调查应对方式的变化是否导致孤独感的变化。此外,进一步的研究应该探索不同亚组(如老年人)的作用,以及不同类型的孤独感的作用,因为这些因素可能会影响孤独感干预措施的效果。