Department of Theoretical & Applied Biology, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Kenya Medical Research Institute/Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Malar J. 2018 Mar 13;17(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2260-2.
Identifying asymptomatic reservoirs of malaria parasites using index cases as entry points into the community is potentially a cost-effective way towards achieving malaria elimination.
Within 1 year, 1430 confirmed malaria cases were identified in Marani hospital, western Kenya. Fifty cases were followed up, and 108 index case household members and 612 neighbours within a 100 m radius were screened. As controls, samples were collected from 510 individuals matched with index cases and located at a distance of ≥ 500 m from them. Infections were diagnosed by microscopy and PCR while simultaneously collecting malaria vectors indoor using pyrethrum spray catches.
In the index case and neighbour households, the prevalence of infection was approximately twice as high as in control households (by PCR: index cases households: 28.9%, neighbours: 25.3%, matched controls: 12.9%). In index case households, the indoor vector density (Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus) was higher (0.46 female/house/night) than in neighbouring (0.31 f/h/n) and control houses (0.29 f/h/n).
Screening index case households and neighbours approximately doubles the chance to detect asymptomatic infections compared to randomly selected households. However, even if all cases were followed up, only a small proportion (˂ 10%) of the asymptomatic reservoir in the population would have been identified. Control programmes need to weigh the increased chance to find cases around index cases vs. the logistical challenges to target this subgroup within the population.
以索引病例作为进入社区的切入点,发现无症状疟原虫携带者,这可能是实现消除疟疾目标的一种具有成本效益的方法。
在 1 年内,肯尼亚西部马拉尼医院共确诊了 1430 例疟疾病例。对其中 50 例进行了随访,并对 108 例索引病例的家庭成员和半径 100 米内的 612 名邻居进行了筛查。作为对照,从与索引病例匹配且与他们的距离大于 500 米的 510 名个体中收集了样本。通过显微镜检查和 PCR 同时进行诊断,同时使用除虫菊酯喷雾捕捉器在室内收集疟疾病媒。
在索引病例和邻居家庭中,感染的患病率大约是对照组的两倍(通过 PCR:索引病例家庭:28.9%,邻居:25.3%,匹配对照:12.9%)。在索引病例家庭中,室内蚊虫密度(冈比亚按蚊和致倦库蚊)较高(0.46 只/户/夜),而在邻居(0.31 只/户/夜)和对照组家庭(0.29 只/户/夜)中较低。
与随机选择家庭相比,筛查索引病例家庭和邻居可将发现无症状感染的机会增加近一倍。然而,即使所有病例都得到了随访,也只能识别出人群中无症状储存库的一小部分(<10%)。控制计划需要权衡在索引病例周围发现病例的机会增加与针对该人群中的亚组的后勤挑战。