Silva Líliam Barbosa, Soares Sônia Maria, Silva Patrícia Aparecida Barbosa, Santos Joseph Fabiano Guimarães, Miranda Lívia Carvalho Viana, Santos Raquel Melgaço
Doctoral student, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Scholarship holder at Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil.
PhD, Associated Professor, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Mar 8;26:e2987. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2331.2987.
to evaluate the quality of care provided to older people with diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension in the Primary Health Care (PHC) according to the Chronic Care Model (CCM) and identify associations with care outcomes.
cross-sectional study involving 105 older people with diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of care. The total score was compared with care outcomes that included biochemical parameters, body mass index, pressure levels and quality of life. Data analysis was based on descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression.
there was a predominance of females and a median age of 72 years. The median PACIC score was 1.55 (IQ 1.30-2.20). Among the PACIC dimensions, the "delivery system design/decision support" was the one that presented the best result. There was no statistical difference between the medians of the overall PACIC score and individual care outcomes. However, when the quality of life and health satisfaction were simultaneously evaluated, a statistical difference between the medians was observed.
the low PACIC scores found indicate that chronic care according to the CCM in the PHC seems still to fall short of its assumptions.
根据慢性病照护模式(CCM)评估初级卫生保健(PHC)中为老年糖尿病患者和/或高血压患者提供的护理质量,并确定与护理结果的关联。
对105名老年糖尿病患者和/或高血压患者进行横断面研究。使用慢性病护理患者评估(PACIC)问卷来评估护理质量。将总分与包括生化参数、体重指数、血压水平和生活质量在内的护理结果进行比较。数据分析基于描述性统计和多元逻辑回归。
女性占多数,中位年龄为72岁。PACIC中位数得分为1.55(四分位间距1.30 - 2.20)。在PACIC维度中,“服务提供系统设计/决策支持”维度表现最佳。总体PACIC得分中位数与个体护理结果之间无统计学差异。然而,当同时评估生活质量和健康满意度时,中位数之间存在统计学差异。
所发现的低PACIC得分表明,初级卫生保健中根据慢性病照护模式提供的慢性病护理似乎仍未达到其预期标准。