Leafly Holdings, Inc., Division of Data Science, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Harvard University, Department of Government, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 14;8(1):4519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22755-2.
The majority of adults in the U.S. now have state-legal access to medical or recreational cannabis products, despite their federal prohibition. Given the wide array of pharmacologically active compounds in these products, it is essential that their biochemical profile is measured and reported to consumers, which requires accurate laboratory testing. However, no universal standards for laboratory testing protocols currently exist, and there is controversy as to whether all reported results are legitimate. To investigate these concerns, we analyzed a publicly available seed-to-sale traceability dataset from Washington state containing measurements of the cannabinoid content of legal cannabis products from state-certified laboratories. Consistent with previous work, we found that commercial Cannabis strains fall into three broad chemotypes defined by the THC:CBD ratio. Moreover, we documented systematic differences in the cannabinoid content reported by different laboratories, relative stability in cannabinoid levels of commercial flower and concentrates over time, and differences between popular commercial strains. Importantly, interlab differences in cannabinoid reporting persisted even after controlling for plausible confounds. Our results underscore the need for standardized laboratory methodologies in the legal cannabis industry and provide a framework for quantitatively assessing laboratory quality.
尽管美国联邦政府禁止使用,但现在大多数成年人都可以合法获得医用或休闲用大麻制品。鉴于这些产品中存在多种具有药理活性的化合物,对其生化特性进行测量并向消费者报告是至关重要的,这需要进行准确的实验室测试。然而,目前还没有通用的实验室测试协议标准,并且对于所有报告的结果是否都是合法的存在争议。为了调查这些问题,我们分析了华盛顿州一个公开的种子到销售的可追溯性数据集,其中包含了州认证实验室对合法大麻产品中大麻素含量的测量结果。与之前的研究一致,我们发现商业大麻品种可以根据 THC:CBD 比例分为三大化学型。此外,我们记录了不同实验室报告的大麻素含量存在系统差异,商业花卉和浓缩物的大麻素水平随时间的相对稳定性,以及流行商业品种之间的差异。重要的是,即使控制了可能的混杂因素,实验室之间在大麻素报告方面的差异仍然存在。我们的研究结果强调了在合法大麻行业中采用标准化实验室方法的必要性,并为定量评估实验室质量提供了框架。