Suppr超能文献

电针穿刺和皮肤磨削术治疗膨胀纹:一项随机对照试验。

Galvano-puncture and dermabrasion for striae distensae: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Ferreira Ana Carolina Ribeiro, Guida Ana Cláudia Pereira, Piccini Adriana Arruda, Parisi Júlia Risso, Sousa Ligia de

机构信息

a Graduate in Physical Therapy , Federal University of Alfenas - UNIFAL-MG , Alfenas , Minas Gerais , Brazil.

b Master , Postgraduate Program in Physiotherapy - UFSCAR, São Carlos , São Paulo , Brazil.

出版信息

J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2019;21(1):39-43. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2018.1444777. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of galvano-puncture (GG) and dermabrasion (DG) in reducing striae distensae in the gluteal region of women.

METHODS

This randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial was conducted at the UNIFAL-MG. Participants were 48 female who had striae distensae alba in the gluteal region. They were randomly divided in GG; DG; and Control Group (CG). The length and width of the largest striae were measured (in millimeters) using a caliper. The same striae were assessed before and after treatment. Infrared thermography was performed in the gluteal region to assess local microcirculation.

RESULTS

Intragroup analysis showed a significant reduction in the dimension of the striae between baseline and treatment session 10 in the GG and DG groups. Between-group analysis revealed a reduction in the width and length of the striae for both the GG and DG groups, but there were no significant differences between the two groups. When compared to the CG and the DG group, the GG group had significant improvements, as shown by thermography.

CONCLUSION

Both GG and DG are effective in reducing striae length and width. However, only the thermography results showed significant differences between GG and control, and between GG and DG.

摘要

目的

评估电针(GG)和磨皮术(DG)对减少女性臀部膨胀纹的效果。

方法

这项随机、对照、单盲临床试验在米纳斯吉拉斯联邦大学(UNIFAL-MG)进行。参与者为48名臀部有白色膨胀纹的女性。她们被随机分为电针组;磨皮术组;以及对照组(CG)。使用卡尺测量最大膨胀纹的长度和宽度(以毫米为单位)。在治疗前后对同一条膨胀纹进行评估。在臀部区域进行红外热成像以评估局部微循环。

结果

组内分析显示,电针组和磨皮术组在基线和第10次治疗之间膨胀纹尺寸显著减小。组间分析显示,电针组和磨皮术组的膨胀纹宽度和长度均减小,但两组之间无显著差异。热成像显示,与对照组和磨皮术组相比,电针组有显著改善。

结论

电针和磨皮术在减少膨胀纹长度和宽度方面均有效。然而,只有热成像结果显示电针组与对照组之间以及电针组与磨皮术组之间存在显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验