Zeichner Joshua A, Eichenfield Lawrence F, Feldman Steven R, Kasteler J Scott, Ferrusi Ilia L
Dr. Zeichner is with Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, New York.
Dr. Eichenfield is with the University of California and Rady Children's Hospital, both in San Diego, California.
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2018 Feb;11(2):47-52. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of rosacea on self-perception, emotional, social, and overall well-being and quality of life in individuals with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR) and papulopustular rosacea (PPR). We distributed a cross-sectional email invitation for participants in the United States to fill out a web-based survey. We included adults who reported having previously received a diagnosis of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea or papulopustular rosacea. Questionnaires measured the psychosocial aspects of rosacea, including the Satisfaction With Appearance Scale and modified Satisfaction With Appearance Scale questionnaires, Impact Assessment for Rosacea Facial Redness, Rosacea-Specific Quality-of-Life questionnaire, and RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. The Impact Assessment for Rosacea Facial Bumps or Pimples was administered to the papulopustular rosacea cohort. Six hundred participants enrolled and completed the survey, with most rating their rosacea as mild or moderate (ETR: 95.6%; PPR: 93.7%). In the erythematotelangiectatic rosacea and papulopustular rosacea cohorts, respectively, 45 and 53 percent disagreed/strongly disagreed that they were satisfied with their appearance due to rosacea; 42 and 27 percent agreed/strongly agreed that they "worry how people will react when they see my rosacea"; and 43 and 59 percent agreed/strongly agreed that they feel their rosacea is unattractive to others. Rosacea-Specific Quality-of-Life total and domain scores indicated negative impact of rosacea for both cohorts. Both cohorts reported worse 36-item Short Form Health Survey overall and domain scores than population norms in the United States. Rosacea had wide-ranging, negative effects on self-perceptions and emotional, social, and overall well-being as well as rosacea-specific quality of life. Overall, both erythematotelangiectatic rosacea and papulopustular rosacea cohorts reported a substantial negative impact of rosacea on quality of life on a range of instruments.
该研究的目的是评估酒渣鼻对红斑毛细血管扩张型酒渣鼻(ETR)和丘疹脓疱型酒渣鼻(PPR)患者的自我认知、情绪、社交以及整体幸福感和生活质量的影响。我们向美国的参与者发送了一份横断面电子邮件邀请,让他们填写一份基于网络的调查问卷。我们纳入了报告曾被诊断为红斑毛细血管扩张型酒渣鼻或丘疹脓疱型酒渣鼻的成年人。问卷测量了酒渣鼻的心理社会方面,包括外貌满意度量表和改良外貌满意度量表问卷、酒渣鼻面部发红影响评估、酒渣鼻特异性生活质量问卷以及兰德36项简短健康调查。酒渣鼻面部丘疹或脓疱影响评估应用于丘疹脓疱型酒渣鼻队列。600名参与者登记并完成了调查,大多数人将他们的酒渣鼻评为轻度或中度(ETR:95.6%;PPR:93.7%)。在红斑毛细血管扩张型酒渣鼻和丘疹脓疱型酒渣鼻队列中,分别有45%和53%的人不同意/强烈不同意他们对因酒渣鼻导致的外貌感到满意;42%和27%的人同意/强烈同意他们“担心人们看到我的酒渣鼻时会有什么反应”;43%和59%的人同意/强烈同意他们觉得自己的酒渣鼻对他人没有吸引力。酒渣鼻特异性生活质量总分和领域得分表明酒渣鼻对两个队列都有负面影响。两个队列报告的36项简短健康调查总体得分和领域得分均低于美国人群规范。酒渣鼻对自我认知、情绪、社交和整体幸福感以及酒渣鼻特异性生活质量有广泛的负面影响。总体而言,红斑毛细血管扩张型酒渣鼻和丘疹脓疱型酒渣鼻队列在一系列测评工具上均报告酒渣鼻对生活质量有重大负面影响。