Ringdahl Joel E, Berg Wendy K, Wacker David P, Ryan Stephen, Ryan Anna, Crook Kayla, Molony Maggie
Department of Communication Sciences and Special Education, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, USA.
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2016 Dec;28(6):905-917. doi: 10.1007/s10882-016-9518-9. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
Previous research related to functional communication training has demonstrated its effectiveness across various communication modalities. Additionally, at least one study has demonstrated that, while the intervention can be effective across various communication modalities, individual participants demonstrate a preference among available communication modalities (indicated by response allocation under a concurrent schedules arrangement). The current study evaluated preference among concurrently available communication modalities for 18 individuals with developmental disabilities, including autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. Results of the study indicated that each of the individuals demonstrated a preference between communicative response modalities, though preference was not always immediately ascertained. The results are discussed within the context of implications for design and implementation of functional communication training.
先前与功能性沟通训练相关的研究已经证明了其在各种沟通方式中的有效性。此外，至少有一项研究表明，虽然这种干预措施在各种沟通方式中都可能有效，但个体参与者在可用的沟通方式中表现出偏好（通过并发日程安排下的反应分配来表明）。本研究评估了18名发育障碍患者（包括自闭症谱系障碍和智力障碍患者）对同时可用的沟通方式的偏好。研究结果表明，每个个体在沟通反应方式之间都表现出偏好，尽管这种偏好并不总是能立即确定。研究结果将在功能性沟通训练的设计和实施的背景下进行讨论。
