Ringdahl Joel E, Schieltz Kelly M, O'Brien Matthew J, McComas Jennifer J, Morlino Rose M, Zabala-Snow Karla A, Unholz-Bowden Emily K, Girtler Shawn N
Center for Autism and Behavioral Education Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GE, USA.
The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2025 Jun;37(3):411-428. doi: 10.1007/s10882-024-09956-6. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
Researchers have shown that behavioral interventions that incorporate communication as a focus have demonstrated efficacy for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Researchers have demonstrated that individuals with IDD allocate responding to one communicative response modality over others when multiple communicative modalities produce reinforcement in the context of a concurrent-schedules arrangement. Identifying preference for communicative response modality provides one approach to incorporating aspects of social validity in the design of behavioral interventions for individuals with IDD, placing additional importance on demonstrations of the robustness of this preference. In the current study, we evaluated preference among concurrently available communication modalities for 14 individuals with IDD. Results of the study replicated previous, similar research in that the vast majority of individuals demonstrated a preference between communicative response modalities. We discuss the results within the context of social validity and implications for intervention.
研究人员表明,以沟通为重点的行为干预已证明对智力和发育障碍(IDD)患者有效。研究人员还证实,在并发安排的情境中,当多种沟通方式都能产生强化作用时,IDD患者会将反应分配到一种沟通反应方式上,而不是其他方式。确定对沟通反应方式的偏好为在为IDD患者设计行为干预措施时纳入社会效度的各个方面提供了一种方法,这使得对这种偏好稳健性的证明变得更加重要。在本研究中,我们评估了14名IDD患者对同时可用的沟通方式的偏好。该研究结果重复了之前类似的研究,即绝大多数患者在沟通反应方式之间表现出偏好。我们将在社会效度的背景下讨论这些结果及其对干预的意义。