• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈部功能障碍指数的临界值及与之相关的负面影响因素。

Cut-off values of and factors associated with a negative influence on Neck Disability Index.

作者信息

Oe Shin, Togawa Daisuke, Yoshida Go, Hasegawa Tomohiko, Yamato Yu, Yasuda Tatsuya, Banno Tomohiro, Arima Hideyuki, Mihara Yuki, Ushirozako Hiroki, Matsuyama Yukihiro

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Division of Geriatric Musculoskeletal Health, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1423-1431. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5555-7. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-018-5555-7
PMID:29569158
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is used to evaluate patients with cervical spine disease. However, few reports have defined the cut-off values of the NDI. The purpose of this study was to identify the cut-off values of and factors with a negative impact on NDI.

METHODS

A total of 487 volunteers were divided into three groups based on disability: none, mild, and disabled. The cut-off values of the NDI were determined using receiver-operating characteristic curves. After these groups were divided based on sex and age adjustment was performed, the factors with a negative impact on NDI were investigated using multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Groups none, mild, and disabled included 207, 186, and 94 volunteers, respectively. The cut-off values of the NDI in each group were 0-5, 6-17, and ≥ 18%, respectively. After adjusting for age, groups none, mild, and disabled had 65, 56, and 23 males, respectively, and 92, 103, and 56 females, respectively. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the factors with a negative impact on NDI in males were manual work (odds ratio [OR] 1.924), higher T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (OR 1.043), and higher C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (OR 1.029, P < 0.05). Among females, the factors were hand-grip strength (OR 0.936), body fat percentage (OR 0.942), and sporting activity (OR 0.456, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Deterioration in NDI was associated with cervical spinal malalignment and manual labor in males and lack of physical activity and sarcopenia in females. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

摘要

目的

颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)用于评估颈椎病患者。然而,很少有报告确定NDI的临界值。本研究的目的是确定NDI的临界值以及对NDI有负面影响的因素。

方法

487名志愿者根据残疾程度分为三组:无残疾、轻度残疾和重度残疾。使用受试者工作特征曲线确定NDI的临界值。在根据性别和年龄进行分组并进行调整后,使用多元逻辑回归分析调查对NDI有负面影响的因素。

结果

无残疾、轻度残疾和重度残疾组分别包括207名、186名和94名志愿者。每组NDI的临界值分别为0 - 5、6 - 17和≥18%。在调整年龄后,无残疾、轻度残疾和重度残疾组男性分别有65名、56名和23名,女性分别有92名、103名和56名。在多元逻辑回归分析中,对男性NDI有负面影响的因素是体力劳动(比值比[OR]1.924)、较高的T1斜率减去颈椎前凸(OR 1.043)和较高的C2 - 7矢状垂直轴(OR 1.029,P < 0.05)。在女性中,这些因素是握力(OR 0.936)、体脂百分比(OR 0.942)和体育活动(OR 0.456,P < 0.05)。

结论

NDI的恶化与男性颈椎排列不齐和体力劳动以及女性缺乏体育活动和肌肉减少症有关。这些幻灯片可在电子补充材料中获取。

相似文献

1
Cut-off values of and factors associated with a negative influence on Neck Disability Index.颈部功能障碍指数的临界值及与之相关的负面影响因素。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1423-1431. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5555-7. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
2
Relationship Between T1 Slope and Cervical Alignment Following Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery: Impact of T1 Slope Minus Cervical Lordosis.多节段颈椎后路融合术后 T1 斜率与颈椎排列的关系:T1 斜率减去颈椎前凸的影响
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41(7):E396-402. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001264.
3
Normative score and cut-off value of the Neck Disability Index.颈部功能障碍指数的常模评分及临界值。
J Orthop Sci. 2012 Nov;17(6):687-93. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0276-y. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
4
Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after cervical laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.颈椎后纵韧带骨化症行颈椎椎板成形术后颈椎矢状位对线与临床疗效的相关性
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):100-7. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE141004. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
5
Spinal Sagittal Alignment, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Scores, and Patient-Reported Outcome among People with Sporting Activity.体育活动人群的脊柱矢状面排列、医院焦虑抑郁量表评分及患者报告结局
Asian Spine J. 2020 Jun;14(3):341-349. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0212. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Impact of Cervical Sagittal Alignment Parameters on Neck Disability.颈椎矢状位对线参数对颈部功能障碍的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Mar;41(5):371-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001221.
7
How the neck affects the back: changes in regional cervical sagittal alignment correlate to HRQOL improvement in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.颈部如何影响背部:颈椎矢状面局部排列变化与成人胸腰椎畸形患者在 2 年随访时 HRQOL 改善相关。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Aug;23(2):153-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE1441. Epub 2015 May 15.
8
Despite worse baseline status depressed patients achieved outcomes similar to those in nondepressed patients after surgery for cervical deformity.尽管抑郁患者的基线状况较差,但他们在接受颈椎畸形手术后的结果与非抑郁患者相似。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Dec;43(6):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17486.
9
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Alters Whole-Spine Sagittal Alignment.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术改变全脊柱矢状位排列。
Yonsei Med J. 2015 Jul;56(4):1060-70. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.1060.
10
The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index.与颈部残疾指数相比,患者对颈椎手术后结果的评定
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 23;11(8):e0161593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161593. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Cervical Deformity After Posterior Cervical Decompression Surgery: A Multicenter Study.颈椎后路减压术后颈椎畸形的危险因素:一项多中心研究
Global Spine J. 2023 Jul;13(6):1457-1466. doi: 10.1177/21925682211036660. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
2
Spinal Sagittal Alignment, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Scores, and Patient-Reported Outcome among People with Sporting Activity.体育活动人群的脊柱矢状面排列、医院焦虑抑郁量表评分及患者报告结局
Asian Spine J. 2020 Jun;14(3):341-349. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0212. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics of cervical sagittal parameters in healthy cervical spine adults and patients with cervical disc degeneration.健康颈椎成年人与颈椎间盘退变患者颈椎矢状面参数的特征
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Feb 2;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1951-8.
2
The change of cervical spine alignment along with aging in asymptomatic population: a preliminary analysis.无症状人群中颈椎排列随年龄增长的变化:一项初步分析。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2363-2371. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5209-1. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
3
Does a combination of physical training, specific exercises and pain education improve health-related quality of life in patients with chronic neck pain? A randomised control trial with a 4-month follow up.
体育锻炼、特定运动和疼痛教育相结合能否改善慢性颈部疼痛患者与健康相关的生活质量?一项为期4个月随访的随机对照试验。
Man Ther. 2016 Dec;26:132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
4
Classifying Whiplash Recovery Status Using the Neck Disability Index: Optimized Cutoff Points Derived From Receiver Operating Characteristic.使用颈部功能障碍指数对挥鞭伤恢复状态进行分类:从受试者工作特征曲线得出的优化截断点
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 May 26.
5
The cohort study for the determination of reference values for spinopelvic parameters (T1 pelvic angle and global tilt) in elderly volunteers.一项针对老年志愿者确定脊柱骨盆参数(T1骨盆角和整体倾斜度)参考值的队列研究。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3687-3693. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4411-x. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
6
Impact of Cervical Sagittal Alignment Parameters on Neck Disability.颈椎矢状位对线参数对颈部功能障碍的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Mar;41(5):371-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001221.
7
The Influence of Age and Sex on Cervical Spinal Alignment Among Volunteers Aged Over 50.年龄和性别对50岁以上志愿者颈椎排列的影响
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Oct 1;40(19):1487-94. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001071.
8
Do male and female patients with chronic neck pain really have different health-related physical fitness, depression, anxiety and quality of life parameters?患有慢性颈部疼痛的男性和女性患者在与健康相关的身体素质、抑郁、焦虑及生活质量参数方面真的存在差异吗?
Int J Rheum Dis. 2017 Sep;20(9):1079-1087. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12389. Epub 2014 May 9.
9
Normative score and cut-off value of the Neck Disability Index.颈部功能障碍指数的常模评分及临界值。
J Orthop Sci. 2012 Nov;17(6):687-93. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0276-y. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
10
Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Neck Disability Index: validity of Dutch language versions.颈部疼痛和残疾量表及颈部残疾指数:荷兰语版本的效度。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan;21(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1920-5. Epub 2011 Aug 4.