• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A re-examination of the BIS/BAS scales: Evidence for BIS and BAS as unidimensional scales.BIS/BAS 量表的再检验:BIS 和 BAS 作为单一维度量表的证据。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Jun;27(2):e1612. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1612. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
2
Psychometric evaluation and revision of Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales in a diverse sample of young adults.对卡弗和怀特的行为抑制系统/行为激活系统量表在不同的年轻成人样本中的心理测量评估与修订。
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(5):485-94. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.870570. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
3
Psychometric Properties of Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS Scales in a Large Sample of Offenders.卡弗与怀特(1994年)的行为抑制系统/行为激活系统量表在大量罪犯样本中的心理测量特性
Pers Individ Dif. 2008 Dec;45(8):732-737. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.021.
4
Psychometric characteristics of Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales in Dutch adolescents and their mothers.荷兰青少年及其母亲的卡弗和怀特的 BIS/BAS 量表的心理计量学特征。
J Pers Assess. 2011 Sep-Oct;93(5):500-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.595745.
5
Evidence for a general factor of behavioral activation system sensitivity.行为激活系统敏感性一般因素的证据。
J Res Pers. 2019 Apr;79:30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
6
Measuring Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation in Older Adults: Construct Validity of the Dutch BIS/BAS Scales.测量老年人的行为抑制和行为激活:荷兰 BIS/BAS 量表的构念效度。
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):1061-1074. doi: 10.1177/10731911211000123. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Revising the BIS/BAS Scale to study development: Measurement invariance and normative effects of age and sex from childhood through adulthood.修订BIS/BAS量表以研究发展:从童年到成年的年龄和性别的测量不变性及规范效应。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Apr;28(4):429-42. doi: 10.1037/pas0000186. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
8
The N2 component in a go-nogo learning task: Motivation, behavioral activation, and reasoning.Go-nogo 学习任务中的 N2 成分:动机、行为激活和推理。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Mar;137:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.12.012. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
9
Handedness and behavioural inhibition system/behavioural activation system (BIS/BAS) scores: A replication and extension of Wright, Hardie, and Wilson (2009).利手与行为抑制系统/行为激活系统(BIS/BAS)得分:对赖特、哈迪和威尔逊(2009年)研究的重复与扩展
Laterality. 2015;20(5):585-603. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2015.1016530. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
10
BIS and BAS Sensitivities at Different Levels of Personality Description: A Latent-Variable Approach with Self- and Informant-Ratings.不同人格描述水平的 BIS 和 BAS 敏感性:基于自评和他评的潜变量方法。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):246-257. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1743709. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Interactions between anxiety and impulsive dimensions are differentially associated with experiential avoidance.焦虑与冲动维度之间的相互作用与经验性回避存在不同程度的关联。
J Mood Anxiety Disord. 2024 Mar 30;6:100067. doi: 10.1016/j.xjmad.2024.100067. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
German version of the specific phobia of vomiting inventory (SPOVI): psychometric properties and correlates in a clinical and non-clinical sample.呕吐特定恐惧症量表(SPOVI)的德文版:临床和非临床样本中的心理测量特性及相关因素
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06744-0.
3
No impact of story context and avatar power on performance in a stop-signal game.故事背景和虚拟形象能力对停止信号游戏表现无影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 11;11(1):e41039. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41039. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
4
Personalizing driver safety interfaces via driver cognitive factors inference.通过驾驶员认知因素推断实现驾驶员安全界面的个性化。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 5;14(1):18058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65144-8.
5
Bifactor models of psychopathology using multi-informant and multi-instrument dimensional measures in the ABCD study.在青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究中,使用多信息源和多工具维度测量的精神病理学双因素模型。
JCPP Adv. 2024 Feb 26;4(2):e12228. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12228. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Romantic Love and Behavioral Activation System Sensitivity to a Loved One.浪漫爱情与行为激活系统对所爱之人的敏感性。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 10;13(11):921. doi: 10.3390/bs13110921.
7
Clinical high risk for psychosis syndrome is associated with reduced neural responding to unpleasant images.临床精神病高危综合征与对不愉快图像的神经反应降低有关。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2023 Nov;132(8):1060-1071. doi: 10.1037/abn0000862. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
8
Construct validity of questionnaires for the original and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory.原始版和修订版强化敏感性理论问卷的结构效度。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 21;13:1026894. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1026894. eCollection 2022.
9
Trans-diagnostic measurement of impulsivity and compulsivity: A review of self-report tools.冲动性和强迫性的跨诊断测量:自我报告工具综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jan;120:455-469. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
10
Personality neuroscience and psychopathology: should we start with biology and look for neural-level factors?人格神经科学与精神病理学:我们应该从生物学入手并寻找神经层面的因素吗?
Personal Neurosci. 2020 May 5;3:e4. doi: 10.1017/pen.2020.5. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and psychometric investigation of an inventory to assess fight, flight, and freeze tendencies: the fight, flight, freeze questionnaire.用于评估战斗、逃跑和僵住倾向的量表的编制与心理测量学研究:战斗、逃跑、僵住问卷
Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(2):117-27. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2014.972443. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
2
Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.双因子模型和旋转:探索多维数据产生单一尺度分数的程度。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):544-59. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477.
3
Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.罗森伯格自尊量表竞争因素结构的纵向测试:特质、短暂人工制品和稳定的反应风格。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):366-81. doi: 10.1037/a0019225.
4
The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.双因素模型在解决健康结果测量中的维度问题方面的作用。
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:19-31. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7. Epub 2007 May 4.
5
The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: implications for personality measurement.新强化敏感性理论:对人格测量的启示
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(4):320-35. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_3.
6
An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data.对有序数据验证性因子分析的替代估计方法的实证评估。
Psychol Methods. 2004 Dec;9(4):466-91. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation scales in a large sample of outpatients with anxiety and mood disorders.对大量焦虑和情绪障碍门诊患者样本进行行为抑制/行为激活量表的心理测量评估。
Psychol Assess. 2004 Sep;16(3):244-54. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.244.
8
Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality.强化敏感性理论与人格。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 May;28(3):317-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.01.005.
9
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects?《宾夕法尼亚州立大学忧虑问卷》的验证性因素分析:多因素还是方法效应?
Behav Res Ther. 2003 Dec;41(12):1411-26. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00059-7.
10
Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors?积极和消极的总体自尊:是实质性的有意义区分还是人为产物?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Apr;70(4):810-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.810.

BIS/BAS 量表的再检验:BIS 和 BAS 作为单一维度量表的证据。

A re-examination of the BIS/BAS scales: Evidence for BIS and BAS as unidimensional scales.

机构信息

Psychology, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA.

Psychology, Duksung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Jun;27(2):e1612. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1612. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1002/mpr.1612
PMID:29575375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6877112/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Carver and White's behavioral inhibition system and behavioral activation system (BIS/BAS) scales are the most widely used to assess constructs of the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory. This study provides a re-examination of the latent structure of the original BIS/BAS scales.

METHODS

The interpretability of the three purported BAS subfactors relative to a "general behavioral activation" factor was assessed using Schmid-Leiman and standard confirmatory factor analysis. Regarding the BIS scale, comparisons were made between (a) Carver and White's unidimensional BIS model, (b) Johnson, Turner, and Iwata's 2-factor BIS model, (c) Heym, Ferguson, and Lawrence's alternative 2-factor BIS model, and (d) a modified Heym et al. model (unidimensional) controlling for method effects of reverse-scored items.

RESULTS

Results revealed the majority of variance of individual BAS items was accounted for by a common, general BAS dimension. Additionally, for the BIS scale, results of the χ difference statistical test supporting the 1-factor model, as well as the noted theoretical and psychometric difficulties in interpreting a multifactor BIS scale, provide converging support that BIS items actually represent a single, unidimensional factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The collective results suggested that the BIS and BAS scales should be conceptualized as separate unidimensional measures, which is consistent with theory behind the original development.

摘要

目的

卡弗和怀特的行为抑制系统和行为激活系统(BIS/BAS)量表是评估修订后的强化敏感性理论结构最常用的量表。本研究重新检验了原始 BIS/BAS 量表的潜在结构。

方法

使用 Schmid-Leiman 和标准验证性因子分析评估了相对于“一般行为激活”因子,三个假定的 BAS 亚因素的可解释性。关于 BIS 量表,我们比较了(a)卡弗和怀特的单维 BIS 模型,(b)约翰逊、特纳和伊瓦塔的 2 因素 BIS 模型,(c)海姆、弗格森和劳伦斯的替代 2 因素 BIS 模型,以及(d)控制反向评分项目方法效应的修改后的海姆等人的模型(单维)。

结果

结果表明,个体 BAS 项目的大部分方差都可以用一个共同的、一般的 BAS 维度来解释。此外,对于 BIS 量表,支持单因素模型的 χ 差异统计检验结果,以及解释多因素 BIS 量表的理论和心理测量困难,都为 BIS 项目实际上代表一个单一的、单维因素提供了一致的支持。

结论

集体结果表明,BIS 和 BAS 量表应被视为独立的单维度测量,这与原始开发背后的理论一致。