Poythress Norman G, Skeem Jennifer L, Weir John, Lilienfeld Scott O, Douglas Kevin S, Edens John F, Kennealy Patrick J
University of South Florida.
Pers Individ Dif. 2008 Dec;45(8):732-737. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.021.
Contemporary motivational theories of psychopathy (Lykken, 1995) employ constructs from Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST; Gray, 1982), behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and behavioral activation system (BAS) functioning, to explain etiologic differences in psychopathy subtypes. Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scales are the most widely used measures of these constructs, yet there is a dearth of research on how these measures perform with offenders. Using a sample of 1,515 offenders, we found evidence that five, rather than the usual four factors, underpin the BIS/BAS scales. Importantly, BIS items that tap into anxiety and fear sensitivity, respectively, split to form separate factors, yielding a structure that is more consistent with the revised (Gray & McNaughton, 2000) than with the earlier version of RST. Implications for the use of the BIS/BAS scales to study psychopathy in offenders are discussed.
当代关于精神病态的动机理论(莱肯,1995年)运用了格雷的强化敏感性理论(RST;格雷,1982年)中的概念,即行为抑制系统(BIS)和行为激活系统(BAS)的功能,来解释精神病态亚型的病因差异。卡弗和怀特(1994年)的BIS/BAS量表是对这些概念使用最为广泛的测量工具,然而,关于这些测量工具在罪犯群体中的表现却鲜有研究。通过对1515名罪犯的样本进行研究,我们发现有证据表明,支撑BIS/BAS量表的是五个而非通常的四个因素。重要的是,分别涉及焦虑和恐惧敏感性的BIS项目分裂形成了单独的因素,产生了一种与修订版(格雷和麦克诺顿,2000年)而非早期版本的RST更为一致的结构。本文讨论了使用BIS/BAS量表研究罪犯精神病态的意义。