Suppr超能文献

关注注意力不集中:用于检测谵妄的简短注意力不集中测量方法的诊断准确性

Focusing on Inattention: The Diagnostic Accuracy of Brief Measures of Inattention for Detecting Delirium.

作者信息

Marra Annachiara, Jackson James C, Ely E Wesley, Graves Amy J, Schnelle John F, Dittus Robert S, Wilson Amanda, Han Jin H

机构信息

Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):551-557. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2943. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is frequently missed in most clinical settings. Brief delirium assessments are needed.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of reciting the months of year backwards (MOTYB) from December to July (MOTYB-6) and December to January (MOTYB-12) for delirium as diagnosed by a psychiatrist and to explore the diagnostic accuracies of the following other brief attention tasks: (1) spell the word "LUNCH" backwards, (2) recite the days of the week backwards, (3) 10-letter vigilance "A" task, and (4) 5 picture recognition task.

DESIGN

Preplanned secondary analysis of a prospective observational study.

SETTING

Emergency department located within an academic, tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

234 acutely ill patients who were =65 years old.

MEASUREMENTS

The inattention tasks were administered by a physician. The reference standard for delirium was a comprehensive psychiatrist assessment using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated.

RESULTS

Making any error on the MOTYB-6 task had a sensitivity of 80.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.9%-91.1%) and specificity of 57.1% (95% CI, 50.4%- 63.7%). Making any error on the MOTYB-12 task had a sensitivity of 84.0% (95% CI, 65.4%-93.6%) and specificity of 51.9% (95% CI, 45.2%-58.5%). The best combination of sensitivity and specificity was reciting the days of the week backwards task; if the patient made any error, this was 84.0% (95% CI, 65.4%-93.6%) sensitive and 81.9% (95% CI, 76.1%-86.5%) specific.

CONCLUSIONS

MOTYB-6 and MOTYB-12 had very good sensitivities but had modest specificities for delirium, limiting their use as a standalone assessment. Reciting the days of the week backwards appeared to have the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for delirium.

摘要

背景

在大多数临床环境中,谵妄常常被漏诊。因此需要进行简短的谵妄评估。

目的

确定从12月倒着数到7月(MOTYB - 6)以及从12月倒着数到1月(MOTYB - 12)对于精神科医生诊断的谵妄的诊断准确性,并探索以下其他简短注意力任务的诊断准确性:(1)倒着拼写“LUNCH”这个单词,(2)倒着背诵一周中的日期,(3)10字母警觉“A”任务,以及(4)5图片识别任务。

设计

对一项前瞻性观察性研究进行预先计划的二次分析。

地点

一家学术性三级护理医院的急诊科。

参与者

234名年龄≥65岁的急性病患者。

测量方法

注意力任务由一名医生执行。谵妄的参考标准是使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版标准进行的全面精神科评估。计算敏感性和特异性。

结果

在MOTYB - 6任务中出现任何错误的敏感性为80.0%(95%置信区间[CI],60.9% - 91.1%),特异性为57.1%(95%CI,50.4% - 63.7%)。在MOTYB - 12任务中出现任何错误的敏感性为84.0%(95%CI,65.4% - 93.6%),特异性为51.9%(95%CI,45.2% - 58.5%)。敏感性和特异性的最佳组合是倒着背诵一周中的日期任务;如果患者出现任何错误,其敏感性为84.0%(95%CI,65.4% - 93.6%),特异性为81.9%(95%CI,76.1% - 86.5%)。

结论

MOTYB - 6和MOTYB - 12对谵妄具有非常好的敏感性,但特异性一般,限制了它们作为独立评估方法的应用。倒着背诵一周中的日期似乎对谵妄具有敏感性和特异性的最佳组合。

相似文献

4
Attention! A good bedside test for delirium?注意!一个用于谵妄的好床边测试?
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;85(10):1122-31. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-307053. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Delirium and Delirium Prevention in the Emergency Department.急诊科的谵妄与谵妄预防
Clin Geriatr Med. 2023 Nov;39(4):535-551. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
3
Deconstructing delirium in the post anaesthesia care unit.剖析麻醉后护理单元中的谵妄
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Oct 4;14:930434. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.930434. eCollection 2022.
6
Delirium: A Marker of Vulnerability in Older People.谵妄:老年人易感性的一个标志
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Apr 30;13:626127. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.626127. eCollection 2021.
7
Succinct Approach to Delirium in the Emergency Department.急诊科谵妄的简洁处理方法
Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep. 2021;9(2):11-18. doi: 10.1007/s40138-021-00226-9. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

9
Attention! A good bedside test for delirium?注意!一个用于谵妄的好床边测试?
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;85(10):1122-31. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-307053. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验