Mikel Izquierdo, PhD, Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarra (Navarra) Spain, Campus of Tudela, Av. de Tarazona s/n. 31500 Tudela (Navarra) Spain, Tel.: + 34 948 417876, E-mail:
J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(4):483-490. doi: 10.1007/s12603-017-0958-4.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of different intra-session exercise orders during concurrent training (CT) on endurance performance in elderly men, as well as to verify its influence on individual responses in endurance performance.
Twenty-five healthy elderly men (64.7 ± 4.1 years) were placed into two groups: strength training prior to endurance training (SE, n=13), and one in the reverse order (ES, n=12). CT was performed three times a week during 12 weeks. Before and after training, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), maximal workload (Wmax), absolute and relative cycling economy at 25, 50, 75 and 100 W (i.e., average VO2 at different stages) were assessed.
Similar increases in VO2peak were observed in the SE and ES groups (SE: 8.1 ± 9.9%; ES: 9.3 ± 9.8%; P<0.001), as well as in Wmax (SE: 19.9 ± 19.3%; ES: 24.1 ± 24.0%; P<0.001). Moreover, significant reductions were observed in the absolute VO2 at 100 W (P<0.05) in the SE and ES groups. No difference between groups was observed. In the ES group, one subject did not respond positively in terms of both VO2max and Wmax, whereas 4 subjects did not respond positively in terms of both VO2max and Wmax in SE group.
CT improved maximal and submaximal endurance performance in elderly men, independent of intra-session exercise order. However, it seems that the ES order elicited more individual responsiveness in terms of maximal endurance performance than SE order.
本研究旨在探讨在老年人的同期训练(Concurrent Training,CT)中,不同的内部分组运动顺序对耐力表现的影响,以及验证其对个体耐力表现的影响。
25 名健康的老年男性(64.7±4.1 岁)被分为两组:力量训练先于耐力训练(SE,n=13)和耐力训练先于力量训练(ES,n=12)。CT 在 12 周内每周进行三次。在训练前后,评估峰值摄氧量(VO2peak)、最大工作量(Wmax)、25、50、75 和 100 W 时的绝对和相对自行车经济(即不同阶段的平均 VO2)。
SE 和 ES 组的 VO2peak 均有类似的增加(SE:8.1±9.9%;ES:9.3±9.8%;P<0.001),Wmax 也有增加(SE:19.9±19.3%;ES:24.1±24.0%;P<0.001)。此外,SE 和 ES 组的 100 W 时绝对 VO2 显著降低(P<0.05)。组间无差异。在 ES 组中,有 1 名受试者在 VO2max 和 Wmax 两方面均未出现积极反应,而在 SE 组中,有 4 名受试者在 VO2max 和 Wmax 两方面均未出现积极反应。
CT 改善了老年人的最大和亚最大耐力表现,与内部分组运动顺序无关。然而,ES 顺序似乎比 SE 顺序在最大耐力表现方面引起了更多的个体反应。