文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

局部进展期中高位和中低位直肠癌术前放化疗的疗效和安全性比较。

Comparison of efficacy and safety of preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced upper and middle/lower rectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0987-0.


DOI:10.1186/s13014-018-0987-0
PMID:29587797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5870751/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety profile of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in upper rectum versus middle/lower rectum. METHODS: The study included 173 patients with stage II or III (T2-4b, N0-2b) LARC who underwent NACRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) between January 2011 and October 2016. Cox regression, log-rank test, and Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated. RESULTS: Among the 173 patients, 58 had lesions in the upper rectum and 115 patients had lesions in middle/lower rectum. In a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 6-73 months), the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 84% and 88% for the patients with upper rectal cancer and 77% and 68% for those with middle/lower rectal cancer (P = 0.251 and P = 0.058, respectively). The 5-year DFS (P = 0.012) and OS (P = 0.003) were better in the NACRT responders [tumor regression grade (TRG) 0 or 1] compared with nonresponders (TRG 2 or 3). The independent prognostic factor of favorable response to NACRT was the FOLFOX regimen (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LARC in the upper rectum who underwent NACRT followed by TME had similar DFS and a trend toward longer OS, compared with those who had middle/lower rectal lesions. Furthermore, FOLFOX may yield superior results than fluoropyrimidine based regimen during NACRT. NACRT might be an alternative option for patients with LARC in the upper rectum as it has a favorable pathological complete response rate and comparable clinical outcomes when compared with patients with LARC in middle/lower rectum.

摘要

背景:我们旨在探索术前新辅助放化疗(NACRT)在治疗高位直肠癌(LARC)与中低位直肠癌中的疗效和安全性。

方法:本研究纳入了 173 例 2011 年 1 月至 2016 年 10 月期间接受 NACRT 联合全直肠系膜切除术(TME)治疗的 II 期或 III 期(T2-4b,N0-2b)LARC 患者。采用 Cox 回归、Log-rank 检验和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线进行分析。

结果:在 173 例患者中,58 例患者的病灶位于高位直肠,115 例患者的病灶位于中低位直肠。中位随访 35 个月(范围 6-73 个月)后,高位直肠癌患者的 5 年无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)分别为 84%和 88%,中低位直肠癌患者的 5 年 DFS 和 OS 分别为 77%和 68%(P=0.251 和 P=0.058)。NACRT 应答者(肿瘤消退分级[TRG]0 或 1)的 5 年 DFS(P=0.012)和 OS(P=0.003)均优于无应答者(TRG 2 或 3)。NACRT 应答的独立预后因素是 FOLFOX 方案(P=0.004)。

结论:与中低位直肠病变患者相比,接受 NACRT 联合 TME 治疗的高位 LARC 患者的 DFS 相似,OS 有延长趋势。此外,在 NACRT 期间,FOLFOX 方案可能比氟嘧啶类方案产生更好的效果。与中低位直肠 LARC 患者相比,NACRT 可能是高位直肠 LARC 患者的一种替代选择,因为它具有较高的病理完全缓解率和可比的临床结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7243/5870751/b31962851751/13014_2018_987_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7243/5870751/e03a7f15a827/13014_2018_987_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7243/5870751/7e8633af2a76/13014_2018_987_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7243/5870751/4545c6f2ae50/13014_2018_987_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7243/5870751/b31962851751/13014_2018_987_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7243/5870751/e03a7f15a827/13014_2018_987_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7243/5870751/7e8633af2a76/13014_2018_987_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7243/5870751/4545c6f2ae50/13014_2018_987_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7243/5870751/b31962851751/13014_2018_987_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparison of efficacy and safety of preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced upper and middle/lower rectal cancer.

Radiat Oncol. 2018-3-27

[2]
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might provide survival benefit in patients with stage IIIb/IIIc locally advanced rectal cancer: A retrospective single-institution study with propensity score-matched comparative analysis.

Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2020-6

[3]
Prognostic significance of tumour regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for a cohort of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: an 8-year retrospective single-institutional study.

Colorectal Dis. 2017-7

[4]
Improved Metastasis- and Disease-Free Survival With Preoperative Sequential Short-Course Radiation Therapy and FOLFOX Chemotherapy for Rectal Cancer Compared With Neoadjuvant Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy: Results of a Matched Pair Analysis.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017-10-1

[5]
Prognostic value of platelet-associated biomarkers in rectal cancer patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A retrospective study.

Cancer Radiother. 2021-4

[6]
Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma: a phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy, and total mesorectal excision or nonoperative management.

BMC Cancer. 2015-10-23

[7]
Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP) trial of cONsolidation Chemotherapy for Locally advanced mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjUvant concurrent chemoraDiothErapy: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (KONCLUDE).

BMC Cancer. 2018-5-8

[8]
The potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is not predicted by tumor regression grade.

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018-10

[9]
The effects of chemoradiotherapy on recurrence and survival in locally advanced rectal cancers with curative total mesorectal excision: a prospective, nonrandomized study.

World J Surg Oncol. 2017-11-22

[10]
Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (ADORE): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2014-9-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Prognostic and Inflammatory Differences Between Upper and Mid-Lower Rectal Cancers in Non-Metastatic Stage II-II Disease.

Curr Oncol. 2025-4-12

[2]
Smoking and Elevated Preneoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Are Associated With High Tumor Regression Grade and Poor Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2025-6

[3]
Upper Rectal Cancer: To Irradiate or Not?

Cureus. 2024-11-4

[4]
Is ypTNM staging a comparable predictor as pTNM staging for survival in non-metastatic rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation therapy?

Oncol Res. 2024

[5]
Quality of Life in Locally Advanced Carcinoma Rectum Patients During Various Phases of NACRT: An Indian Perspective.

Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024-6

[6]
Comparative analysis of preoperative chemoradiotherapy and upfront surgery in the treatment of upper-half rectal cancer: oncological benefits, surgical outcomes, and cost implications.

Updates Surg. 2024-6

[7]
Survival of Patients With Metastatic Rectum Cancer Who Underwent Metastasectomy Following Conversion Chemotherapy Sans Pelvic Radiotherapy: A Turkish Oncology Group Study.

Cureus. 2023-5-17

[8]
Biomarkers of Favorable vs. Unfavorable Responses in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Cells. 2022-5-11

[9]
Surgical Efficacy and Safety of Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer following Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Chemotherapy.

J Oncol. 2022-3-19

[10]
Feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer.

J Minim Access Surg. 2021

本文引用的文献

[1]
Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Ann Oncol. 2017-7-1

[2]
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2017-3-1

[3]
Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer Affects Lymph Node Yield and Status Without Clear Implications on Outcome: The Case for Eliminating a Metric and Using Preoperative Staging to Guide Therapy.

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016-12

[4]
Can we eliminate neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in favor of neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy for select stage II/III rectal adenocarcinomas: Analysis of the National Cancer Data base.

Cancer. 2017-3-1

[5]
A retrospective comparison of outcome and toxicity of preoperative image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional pelvic radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma.

J Radiat Res. 2017-3-1

[6]
An observational study of extending FOLFOX chemotherapy, lengthening the interval between radiotherapy and surgery, and enhancing pathological complete response rates in rectal cancer patients following preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016-9

[7]
Long-Term Survival and Local Relapse Following Surgery Without Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Upper Rectal Cancer: An International Multi-Institutional Study.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016-5

[8]
Changes in treatment patterns for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in the United States over the past decade: An analysis from the National Cancer Data Base.

Cancer. 2016-7-1

[9]
Robotic surgery with high dissection and low ligation technique for consecutive patients with rectal cancer following preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016-6

[10]
Neoadjuvant 5-FU or Capecitabine Plus Radiation With or Without Oxaliplatin in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015-9-14

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索