• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does observability affect prosociality?可观察性会影响亲社会行为吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Mar 28;285(1875). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0116.
2
Green when seen? No support for an effect of observability on environmental conservation in the laboratory: a registered report.观察时呈绿色?实验室中关于可观察性对环境保护影响的研究无支持证据:一项注册报告
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Apr 1;7(4):190189. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190189. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being.善良的回报?亲社会行为与幸福感之间关系的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Dec;146(12):1084-1116. doi: 10.1037/bul0000298. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
Does gratitude enhance prosociality?: A meta-analytic review.感恩是否能增强亲社会行为?一项元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Jun;143(6):601-635. doi: 10.1037/bul0000103. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
5
Acute hunger does not always undermine prosociality.急性饥饿并不总是会破坏亲社会行为。
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 18;10(1):4733. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12579-7.
6
Are Older Adults More Prosocial Than Younger Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年人比年轻人更利他吗?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gerontologist. 2024 Sep 1;64(9). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae082.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Why we share our cookies: Prosocial behavior from a psychological perspective.我们为何共享我们的cookies:从心理学角度看亲社会行为。
Anthropol Anz. 2019 Sep 1;76(3):181-194. doi: 10.1127/anthranz/2019/0880.
9
Does stress make us more-or less-prosocial? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of acute stress on prosocial behaviours using economic games.压力会让我们变得更愿意帮助他人还是更不愿意帮助他人?一项使用经济游戏评估急性压力对亲社会行为影响的系统综述和荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Nov;142:104905. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104905. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
10
Religiosity predicts prosociality, especially when measured by self-report: A meta-analysis of almost 60 years of research.宗教信仰预测亲社会行为,尤其是通过自我报告来衡量时:近 60 年研究的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2024 Mar;150(3):284-318. doi: 10.1037/bul0000413. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Wilfully ignoring inconvenient information decreases prosociality across diverse cultures.故意忽视不利信息会降低不同文化背景下的亲社会行为。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02287-2.
2
Guilt drives prosociality across 20 countries.内疚感促使20个国家的人们做出亲社会行为。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02286-3.
3
Factors impacting effective altruism: revisiting heuristics and biases in charity in a replication and extension registered report of Baron and Szymanska (2011).影响有效利他主义的因素:在对巴伦和希曼斯卡(2011年)的一项复制与扩展注册报告中重新审视慈善中的启发法和偏差
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 21;12(5):250290. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250290. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Imagined eye cue increased altruistic behavior toward charity instead of stranger.想象中的眼神暗示增加了对慈善机构而非陌生人的利他行为。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 11;16:1503766. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1503766. eCollection 2025.
5
Social observation differentially affects prosocial learning of selfish and prosocial people.社会观察对自私者和亲社会者的亲社会学习有不同影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 12;16:1440302. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1440302. eCollection 2025.
6
Big brother: the effects of surveillance on fundamental aspects of social vision.老大哥:监控对社会视野基本层面的影响。
Neurosci Conscious. 2024 Dec 10;2024(1):niae039. doi: 10.1093/nc/niae039. eCollection 2024.
7
Naming and shaming as a strategy for enforcing the Paris Agreement: The role of political institutions and public concern.点名羞辱作为执行《巴黎协定》的策略:政治机构和公众关注的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 3;120(40):e2305075120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305075120. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
8
Warming up cool cooperators.温暖冷漠的合作者。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Nov;7(11):1917-1932. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01687-6. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
9
No good deed goes unpunished: the social costs of prosocial behaviour.善有恶报:亲社会行为的社会成本。
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Jul 21;3:e40. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.35. eCollection 2021.
10
Testosterone eliminates strategic prosocial behavior through impacting choice consistency in healthy males.睾酮通过影响健康男性选择的一致性来消除策略性亲社会行为。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023 Sep;48(10):1541-1550. doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01570-y. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation.从众的思想偏见、对共同现实的渴望和错误信息的传播。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Oct;23:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
2
Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness.不谋私利的合作被用来表明可信性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 20;113(31):8658-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601280113.
3
Watching eyes on potential litter can reduce littering: evidence from two field experiments.注视潜在垃圾的眼睛可减少乱扔垃圾行为:来自两项实地实验的证据。
PeerJ. 2015 Dec 1;3:e1443. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1443. eCollection 2015.
4
Evolutionary Theory and the Ultimate-Proximate Distinction in the Human Behavioral Sciences.进化理论与人类行为科学中的终极-近因区分。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):38-47. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393528. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
5
Gratefully received, gratefully repaid: the role of perceived fairness in cooperative interactions.感恩受之,感恩报之:感知公平在合作互动中的作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 8;9(12):e114976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114976. eCollection 2014.
6
Young children are more generous when others are aware of their actions.当他人意识到儿童的行为时,儿童会更加慷慨。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048292. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
7
Five-year olds, but not chimpanzees, attempt to manage their reputations.5 岁儿童而非黑猩猩会试图维护自己的名誉。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048433. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
8
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
9
The weirdest people in the world?世界上最奇怪的人?
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
10
Processing of the incentive for social approval in the ventral striatum during charitable donation.腹侧纹状体在慈善捐赠中对社会认可激励的加工。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Apr;22(4):621-31. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21228.

可观察性会影响亲社会行为吗?

Does observability affect prosociality?

机构信息

Personality, Social Psychology, and Health (PSPH) Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

Personality, Social Psychology, and Health (PSPH) Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Mar 28;285(1875). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0116.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2018.0116
PMID:29593114
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5897647/
Abstract

The observation of behaviour is a key theoretical parameter underlying a number of models of prosociality. However, the empirical findings showing the effect of observability on prosociality are mixed. In this meta-analysis, we explore the boundary conditions that may account for this variability, by exploring key theoretical and methodological moderators of this link. We identified 117 papers yielding 134 study level effects (total = 788 164) and found a small but statistically significant, positive association between observability and prosociality ( = 0.141, 95% confidence interval = 0.106, 0.175). Moderator analysis showed that observability produced stronger effects on prosociality: (i) in the presence of passive observers (i.e. people whose role was to only observe participants) versus perceptions of being watched, (ii) when participants' decisions were consequential (versus non-consequential), (iii) when the studies were performed in the laboratory (as opposed to in the field/online), (iv) when the studies used repeated measures (instead of single games), and (v) when the studies involved social dilemmas (instead of bargaining games). These effects show the conditions under which observability effects on prosociality will be maximally observed. We describe the theoretical and practical significance of these results.

摘要

行为观察是许多亲社会行为模型的一个关键理论参数。然而,关于可观察性对亲社会行为影响的实证研究结果却存在差异。在这项元分析中,我们通过探索该关联的关键理论和方法学调节因素,来探究可能导致这种可变性的边界条件。我们确定了 117 篇论文,得出了 134 项研究水平的效应(总计=788164),发现可观察性和亲社会行为之间存在小但具有统计学意义的正相关(=0.141,95%置信区间=0.106,0.175)。调节分析表明,可观察性对亲社会行为的影响更大:(i)在存在被动观察者(即仅观察参与者的人)而不是被监视的感觉的情况下,(ii)当参与者的决策具有后果(而不是无后果)时,(iii)当研究在实验室中进行(而不是在现场/在线进行)时,(iv)当研究使用重复测量(而不是单次游戏)时,以及(v)当研究涉及社会困境(而不是讨价还价游戏)时。这些效果显示了在哪些条件下可以最大程度地观察到可观察性对亲社会行为的影响。我们描述了这些结果的理论和实际意义。