Australian-German Climate and Energy College, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.
School of Earth Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 4;15(4):674. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040674.
A complex, whole-of-economy issue such as climate change demands an interdisciplinary, multi-sectoral response. However, evidence suggests that human health has remained elusive in its influence on the development of ambitious climate change mitigation policies for many national governments, despite a recognition that the combustion of fossil fuels results in pervasive short- and long-term health consequences. We use insights from literature on the political economy of health and climate change, the science–policy interface and power in policy-making, to identify additional barriers to the meaningful incorporation of health co-benefits into climate change mitigation policy development. Specifically, we identify four key interrelated areas where barriers may exist in relation to health co-benefits: discourse, efficiency, vested interests and structural challenges. With these insights in mind, we argue that the current politico-economic paradigm in which climate change is situated and the processes used to develop climate change mitigation policies do not adequately support accounting for health co-benefits. We present approaches for enhancing the role of health co-benefits in the development of climate change mitigation policies to ensure that health is embedded in the broader climate change agenda.
气候变化是一个复杂的、涉及整个经济的问题,需要采取跨学科、多部门的应对措施。然而,有证据表明,尽管人们认识到化石燃料的燃烧会导致普遍存在的短期和长期健康后果,但人类健康在许多国家政府制定雄心勃勃的气候变化缓解政策方面的影响仍然难以捉摸。我们利用健康和气候变化政治经济学、科学政策接口以及决策中的权力方面的文献见解,确定将健康共同效益纳入气候变化缓解政策制定的意义的其他障碍。具体来说,我们确定了可能存在健康共同效益障碍的四个关键相互关联的领域:话语、效率、既得利益和结构挑战。考虑到这些见解,我们认为,目前将气候变化置于其中的政治经济范式以及用于制定气候变化缓解政策的过程,并没有充分支持核算健康共同效益。我们提出了增强健康共同效益在气候变化缓解政策制定中的作用的方法,以确保健康纳入更广泛的气候变化议程。