Philips Research, High Tech Campus 34, 5656 AE Eindhoven, Netherlands. Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Postbus 513, 5600MB Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Physiol Meas. 2018 May 15;39(5):055001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aabbc2.
To compare conditional random fields (CRF), hidden Markov models (HMMs) and Bayesian linear discriminants (LDs) for cardiorespiratory sleep stage classification on a five-class sleep staging task (wake/N1/N2/N3/REM), to explore the benefits of incorporating time information in the classification and to evaluate the feasibility of sleep staging on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients.
The classifiers with and without time information were evaluated with 10-fold cross-validation on five-, four- (wake/N1 + N2/N3/REM) and three-class (wake/NREM/REM) classification tasks using a data set comprising 443 night-time polysomnography (PSG) recordings of 231 participants (180 healthy participants, 100 of which had a 'regular' sleep architecture, and 51 participants previously diagnosed with OSA).
CRF with time information (CRFt) outperforms all other classifiers on all tasks, achieving a median accuracy and Cohen's κ for all participants of 62.8% and 0.44 for five classes, 68.8% and 0.47 for four classes, and 77.6% and 0.55 for three classes. An advantage was found in training classifiers, specifically for 'regular' and 'OSA' participants, achieving an improvement in classification performance for these groups. For 'regular' participants, CRFt achieved a median accuracy and Cohen's κ of 67.0% and 0.51, 70.8% and 0.53 and 81.3% and 0.62 for five-, four- and three-classes respectively, and for 'OSA' patients, of 59.9% and 0.40, 69.7% and 0.45, and 75.8% and 0.51 for five-, four- and three-classes respectively.
The results suggest that CRFt is not only better at learning and predicting more complex and irregular sleep architectures, but that it also performs reasonably well in five-class classification-the standard for sleep scoring used in clinical PSG. Additionally, and albeit with a decrease in performance when compared with healthy participants, sleep stage classification in OSA patients using cardiorespiratory features and CRFt seems feasible with reasonable accuracy.
比较条件随机场(CRF)、隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)和贝叶斯线性判别器(LD)在五类睡眠分期任务(清醒/N1/N2/N3/REM)上的心肺睡眠分期分类性能,探索在分类中纳入时间信息的益处,并评估在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者上进行睡眠分期的可行性。
使用来自 231 名参与者的 443 个夜间多导睡眠图(PSG)记录的数据集(180 名健康参与者,其中 100 名具有“规则”睡眠结构,51 名参与者先前被诊断为 OSA),通过 10 折交叉验证,在五类(清醒/N1+N2/N3/REM)、四类(清醒/NREM/REM)和三类(清醒/NREM/REM)分类任务中评估具有和不具有时间信息的分类器。
具有时间信息的条件随机场(CRFt)在所有任务上均优于所有其他分类器,在所有参与者中,中位数准确度和 Cohen's κ 为 62.8%和 0.44(五类)、68.8%和 0.47(四类)、77.6%和 0.55(三类)。在训练分类器方面发现了优势,特别是对于“规则”和“OSA”参与者,这为这些群体的分类性能提高提供了帮助。对于“规则”参与者,CRFt 的中位数准确度和 Cohen's κ 分别为 67.0%和 0.51、70.8%和 0.53、81.3%和 0.62(五类、四类和三类),而对于“OSA”患者,分别为 59.9%和 0.40、69.7%和 0.45、75.8%和 0.51(五类、四类和三类)。
结果表明,CRFt 不仅更擅长学习和预测更复杂和不规则的睡眠结构,而且在五类分类(临床 PSG 中使用的睡眠评分标准)中表现也相当出色。此外,尽管与健康参与者相比性能有所下降,但使用心肺特征和 CRFt 对 OSA 患者进行睡眠分期似乎具有合理的准确性,是可行的。