• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计基于地点的可持续性和可复制性干预措施:以“前进!奥斯汀/行动起来!奥斯汀”为例

Designing Place-Based Interventions for Sustainability and Replicability: The Case of GO! Austin/VAMOS! Austin.

作者信息

Hussaini Aliya, Pulido Carmen Llanes, Basu Semonti, Ranjit Nalini

机构信息

US Health, Michael and Susan Dell FoundationAustin, TX, United States.

GO! Austin/VAMOS! Austin (GAVA), Austin, TX, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2018 Mar 22;6:88. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00088. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00088
PMID:29623272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5874305/
Abstract

Place-based health efforts account for the role of the community environment in shaping decisions and circumstances that affect population well-being. Such efforts, rooted as they are in the theory that health is socially determined, mobilize resources for health promotion that are not typically used, and offer a more informed and robust way of promoting health outcomes within a community. Common criticisms of place-based work include the difficulty of , since engagement is so specific to a place, and limited of the work, in the absence of continued institutional structures, both within the community and supporting structures outside the community, to keep these initiatives resilient. This paper describes a place-based initiative, GO! Austin/VAMOS! Austin (GAVA), which was designed to harness the strengths of place-based work-namely, its specificity to place and community. From the start, the project was designed to balance this specificity with a focus on developing and utilizing a standardized set of evidence-informed implementation and evaluation approaches and tools that were flexible enough to be modified for specific settings. This was accompanied by an emphasis on leadership and capacity building within resident leaders, which provided for informed intervention and demand building capacity, but also for longevity as partners, philanthropic, and otherwise, moved in and out of the work.

摘要

基于地点的健康工作考虑到社区环境在塑造影响人口福祉的决策和环境方面所起的作用。此类工作基于健康是由社会决定的这一理论,调动了通常未被使用的促进健康的资源,并提供了一种在社区内促进健康成果的更明智、更有力的方式。对基于地点的工作的常见批评包括,由于参与工作非常特定于某个地点,所以存在困难,而且在社区内部和社区外部的支持结构缺乏持续的体制结构以保持这些举措的弹性的情况下,工作的可持续性有限。本文介绍了一项基于地点的倡议,即“前进!奥斯汀/行动!奥斯汀”(GAVA),该倡议旨在利用基于地点的工作的优势,即其对地点和社区的特定性。从一开始,该项目就旨在在这种特定性与专注于开发和利用一套标准化的循证实施与评估方法及工具之间取得平衡,这些方法和工具足够灵活,可以针对特定环境进行修改。同时,该项目还强调居民领袖的领导力和能力建设,这不仅为明智的干预和需求建设能力提供了条件,而且在合作伙伴、慈善机构及其他方面参与和退出这项工作时,也为工作的长期开展提供了保障。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d478/5874305/d43cd80fcecc/fpubh-06-00088-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d478/5874305/9778afa04f30/fpubh-06-00088-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d478/5874305/d43cd80fcecc/fpubh-06-00088-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d478/5874305/9778afa04f30/fpubh-06-00088-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d478/5874305/d43cd80fcecc/fpubh-06-00088-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Designing Place-Based Interventions for Sustainability and Replicability: The Case of GO! Austin/VAMOS! Austin.设计基于地点的可持续性和可复制性干预措施:以“前进!奥斯汀/行动起来!奥斯汀”为例
Front Public Health. 2018 Mar 22;6:88. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00088. eCollection 2018.
2
Design and evaluation of a coalition-led obesity initiative to promote healthy eating and physical activity in low-income, ethnically diverse communities: the Go! Austin/Vamos! Austin initiative.一项由多方合作主导的肥胖预防倡议的设计与评估,该倡议旨在促进低收入、种族多元化社区的健康饮食和体育活动:“前进!奥斯汀/加油!奥斯汀”倡议
Arch Public Health. 2019 May 29;77:25. doi: 10.1186/s13690-019-0350-4. eCollection 2019.
3
Outcomes of a Community-Wide Health Intervention in a Low-Income, Primarily Hispanic Community: The Go! Austin/Vamos! Austin (GAVA) Initiative.低收入、主要为西班牙裔社区的全社区健康干预成果:“前进!奥斯汀/加油!奥斯汀”(GAVA)倡议
Health Promot Pract. 2022 Jan;23(1):185-194. doi: 10.1177/1524839920961365. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
Integrating collaborative place-based health promotion coalitions into existing health system structures: the experience from one Australian health coalition.将基于场所的合作性健康促进联盟纳入现有卫生系统结构:来自澳大利亚一个健康联盟的经验。
Int J Integr Care. 2015 Dec 15;15:e047. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2012. eCollection 2015 Oct-Dec.
6
Supporting Community-based Healthy Eating and Active Living Efforts in Sustaining Beyond the Funding Cycle.支持社区健康饮食和积极生活努力,以维持资金周期之外的可持续性。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 May;54(5 Suppl 2):S133-S138. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.12.019.
7
Defining and Measuring Sustainability in the Food & Fitness Initiative.在“食品与健康倡议”中定义和衡量可持续性。
Health Promot Pract. 2018 Sep;19(1_suppl):78S-91S. doi: 10.1177/1524839918782697.
8
9
Healthy Canada by Design CLASP: Lessons learned from the first phase of an intersectoral, cross-provincial, built environment initiative.加拿大健康设计CLASP:从一个跨部门、跨省的建筑环境倡议第一阶段汲取的经验教训。
Can J Public Health. 2014 Sep 12;106(1 Suppl 1):eS50-63. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4555.
10
Lessons Learned From Food & Fitness About Building Successful Partnerships: Focus, Capacity, and Sustainability.从食品与健身领域汲取的关于建立成功伙伴关系的经验教训:重点、能力与可持续性。
Health Promot Pract. 2018 Sep;19(1_suppl):115S-124S. doi: 10.1177/1524839918786951.

引用本文的文献

1
Urban Sustainability Transitions in the Global South: a Case Study of Curitiba and Accra.全球南方的城市可持续发展转型:库里蒂巴和阿克拉的案例研究
Urban Forum (Johannesbg). 2022;33(2):223-244. doi: 10.1007/s12132-021-09438-4. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
2
Reducing risk for chronic disease: evaluation of a collective community approach to sustainable evidence-based health programming.减少慢性病风险:对基于可持续证据的集体社区方法进行健康规划的评估。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 20;24(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17670-3.
3
Characterizing Micro-scale Disparities in Childhood Obesity: Examining the Influence of Multilevel Factors on 4-Year Changes in BMI, Healthy Eating, and Physical Activity, Among a Cohort of Children Residing in Disadvantaged Urban Enclaves.

本文引用的文献

1
Health by Design: Interweaving Health Promotion into Environments and Settings.《设计健康:将健康促进融入环境与场景》
Front Public Health. 2017 Sep 29;5:268. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00268. eCollection 2017.
2
Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2011-2014.2011 - 2014年美国成年人及青少年肥胖症患病率
NCHS Data Brief. 2015 Nov(219):1-8.
3
Interventions in small food stores to change the food environment, improve diet, and reduce risk of chronic disease.小食品店干预措施以改变食品环境、改善饮食、降低慢性病风险。
刻画儿童肥胖的微观差异:在居住于城市弱势飞地的一群儿童中,研究多层次因素对BMI、健康饮食和身体活动四年变化的影响。
Front Public Health. 2019 Oct 22;7:301. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00301. eCollection 2019.
4
Factors Associated with Use of Recreational Facilities and Physical Activity Among Low-Income Latino Adults.低收入拉丁裔成年人使用娱乐设施和进行身体活动的相关因素。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2020 Jun;22(3):555-562. doi: 10.1007/s10903-019-00920-7.
5
Collaborative Action on Child Equity: Lessons from the Field.儿童公平合作行动:来自实地的经验教训。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):365-370. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.365. eCollection 2019.
6
Design and evaluation of a coalition-led obesity initiative to promote healthy eating and physical activity in low-income, ethnically diverse communities: the Go! Austin/Vamos! Austin initiative.一项由多方合作主导的肥胖预防倡议的设计与评估,该倡议旨在促进低收入、种族多元化社区的健康饮食和体育活动:“前进!奥斯汀/加油!奥斯汀”倡议
Arch Public Health. 2019 May 29;77:25. doi: 10.1186/s13690-019-0350-4. eCollection 2019.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E59. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
4
Role of built environments in physical activity, obesity, and cardiovascular disease.建筑环境在身体活动、肥胖和心血管疾病中的作用。
Circulation. 2012 Feb 7;125(5):729-37. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.969022.
5
Unpacking prevention capacity: an intersection of research-to-practice models and community-centered models.剖析预防能力:研究到实践模式与以社区为中心模式的交叉点
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):182-96. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9162-3.
6
Multi-sectoral health promotion and public health: the role of evidence.多部门健康促进与公共卫生:证据的作用
J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Jun;28(2):168-72. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl013.
7
Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions.复杂干预随机对照试验中的过程评估
BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):413-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
8
Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity.建筑环境中的不平等是导致身体活动和肥胖方面关键健康差异的根本原因。
Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):417-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0058.
9
School-based health education programs can be maintained over time: results from the CATCH Institutionalization study.以学校为基础的健康教育项目可以长期维持:CATCH 制度化研究的结果
Prev Med. 2004 May;38(5):594-606. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.017.
10
Dissecting the "black box" of community intervention: background and rationale.
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2001;56:5-12.