Edelman Alexandra, Taylor Judy, Ovseiko Pavel V, Topp Stephanie M
College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University , Townsville, Australia.
College of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University , Townsville, Australia.
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Apr 9;32(2):279-297. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-09-2017-0255. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
Purpose Academic health centres (AHCs) are organisations that pursue a "tripartite" mission to deliver high-quality care to patients, undertake clinical and laboratory research, and train future health professionals. The last decade has seen a global spread of AHC models and a growing interest in the role of AHCs in addressing health system equity. The purpose of this paper is to synthesise and critically appraise the evidence on the role of AHCs in improving health equity. Design/methodology/approach Peer-reviewed and grey literature published in English between 2000 and 2016 were searched. Articles that identified AHCs as the primary unit of analysis and that also addressed health equity concepts in relation to the AHC's activity or role were included. Findings In total, 103 publications met the inclusion criteria of which 80 per cent were expert opinion. Eight descriptive themes were identified through which health equity concepts in relation to AHCs were characterised, described and operationalised: population health, addressing health disparities, social determinants of health, community engagement, global health, health system reform, value-based and accountable financing models, and role clarification/recalibration. There was consensus that AHCs can and should address health disparities, but there is a lack of empirical evidence to show that AHCs have a capacity to contribute to health equity goals or are demonstrating this contribution. Originality/value This review highlights the relevance of health equity concepts in discussions about the role and missions of AHCs. Future research should improve the quality of the evidence base by empirically examining health equity strategies and interventions of AHCs in multiple countries and contexts.
目的 学术健康中心(AHCs)是致力于实现“三方”使命的组织,即向患者提供高质量医疗服务、开展临床和实验室研究以及培养未来的健康专业人员。在过去十年中,AHC模式在全球范围内得到推广,人们对AHCs在促进卫生系统公平性方面的作用也越来越感兴趣。本文的目的是综合并批判性地评估有关AHCs在改善健康公平性方面作用的证据。
设计/方法/途径 检索了2000年至2016年间以英文发表的同行评审文献和灰色文献。纳入了将AHCs确定为主要分析单位且涉及与AHC活动或作用相关的健康公平概念的文章。
结果 共有103篇出版物符合纳入标准,其中80%为专家意见。确定了八个描述性主题,通过这些主题对与AHCs相关的健康公平概念进行了特征描述、阐述和实施:人群健康、解决健康差距、健康的社会决定因素、社区参与、全球健康、卫生系统改革、基于价值和可问责的融资模式以及角色澄清/重新校准。人们一致认为AHCs能够且应该解决健康差距问题,但缺乏实证证据表明AHCs有能力为健康公平目标做出贡献或正在展示这种贡献。
原创性/价值 本综述强调了健康公平概念在关于AHCs作用和使命的讨论中的相关性。未来的研究应通过实证研究多个国家和背景下AHCs的健康公平战略和干预措施,提高证据基础的质量。