1 Ghent University, Belgium.
2 Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Aug;44(8):1163-1179. doi: 10.1177/0146167218764653. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
The current studies integrate different frameworks on the positive and negative consequences of ethnic diversity for intergroup relations. Using a nationally stratified sample of Dutch majority members ( N = 680) from 50 cities in the Netherlands, Study 1 demonstrated that objective diversity was indirectly related to prejudice and to generalized, ingroup, and outgroup trust, through more positive and more negative contact. These indirect effects tended to be stronger for high versus low authoritarians. Furthermore, perceived diversity was indirectly related to less trust and greater prejudice, via more negative contact and threat. Again, these associations were more pronounced among high authoritarians. Study 2, using a representative sample of German majority members ( N = 412) nested within 237 districts, replicated the cross-sectional results regarding objective diversity and prejudice. In addition, longitudinal analyses indicated that objective diversity predicted more positive and more negative contact 2 years later, though only among moderate and high authoritarians.
当前的研究整合了不同框架，探讨了族群多样性对群体间关系的积极和消极后果。使用来自荷兰 50 个城市的具有全国代表性的荷兰多数群体成员（N=680）的样本，研究 1 表明，客观多样性通过更多的积极和消极接触，与偏见以及对一般内群体和外群体的信任呈间接相关。对于高权威主义者而言，这些间接效应往往更强。此外，感知多样性通过更多的消极接触和威胁，与较低的信任和更大的偏见呈间接相关。同样，这些关联在高权威主义者中更为明显。研究 2 使用德国多数群体成员（N=412）的代表性样本，嵌套在 237 个地区内，复制了关于客观多样性和偏见的横截面结果。此外，纵向分析表明，客观多样性在 2 年后预测了更多的积极和消极接触，但仅在中度和高度权威主义者中。
